RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime

Page: << < prev 6 7 8 9 [10]

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 12:32:43 PM

MasterJack53

Posts: 89
Joined: 1/24/2006
Status: offline

I recently called CBS and spoke with a representative of Kati Currics news show. I was calling because for several shows she had aired inflamatory, and in my opiniopn, unnecessary racial stories that to me only open wounds previously closed. The gentleman I spoke with discussed racial profiling and such with me. I got the impression from his manner of speaking and his voice he was Black. It ended up with me telling him Kati was a racist and if it happend anymore I would stop watching her show. Im sure that sent a ripple all the way up CBS' ass. haha Needless to say, I do see more pro democrat stories on her nightly news. Just my thoughts. Master Jack a conservative by nature not political affiliation.

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Post #: 181

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 12:35:21 PM

MasterJack53

Posts: 89
Joined: 1/24/2006
Status: offline

excellent point!! well said!! WUFF WUFF!!

(in reply to CreativeDominant)

Post #: 182

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 12:35:59 PM

luckydawg

Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline

Yet there is no evidence that the record says what he claimed...thats the point.

And no MNOT, the entire military is not purged everytime there is an election in the USA. Are you really that stupid to think only republicans are in th Millitary when there is a republican president. Really? That fucking dumb?

I do understand now that you have no clue what a citation is for. More of the left wing equivilancy game I suppose. You have a citation of an allegation. Not a citation of evidence.

And if you haven't figured that out by now, you ain't going to.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 183

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 1:42:39 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

And no MNOT, the entire military is not purged everytime there is an election in the USA. Are you really that stupid to think only republicans are in th Millitary when there is a republican president. Really? That fucking dumb?

No, you are the fucking idiot here, learn to read and comprehend at a 6th grade level you fuckstick. Never said that or anything like that.

I do understand now that you have no clue what a citation is for. More of the left wing equivilancy game I suppose. You have a citation of an allegation. Not a citation of evidence.

Fuck you troll, you haven't proffered a citation of anything, ever....you dont have citations for any the shit drooling out of your mouth.

And if you haven't figured that out by now, you ain't going to.

Yeah, and if everyone doesnt know you are a sockpuppet with about 15 profiles coming out here and gladhanding yourself, then they aint going to.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to luckydawg)

Post #: 184

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 1:51:32 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

oh we know Master Ron... lol... its funny actually, in a pathetic kind of way.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 185

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 1:55:45 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Well, you gotta admit, the kid is a goddamn hoot and a half.....I am almost passing out from no air laughing half the time I read and post with him.

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Post #: 186

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 1:59:44 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

LOL... he is easily wound up

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 187

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 2:02:21 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Tazz,

well, I figure him and his profiles are from somewhere around boston, really he got a dry sense of humor like his sigline.....

all his sockpuppets got a sig something like .....

I was posting on sockpuppet13 but it got fucked up...

(ya think?)

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Post #: 188

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 2:33:41 PM

luckydawg

Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline

Mnot. I can't really argue with "Fuck you troll" Neat trick to make it look I was saying that.

I guess I am done with this thread.

It is funny you think I am an army of some sort. And Tazzy buys into your delusions.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 189

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 2:35:40 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

why cant you argue with that? you dont have to proffer citations, and only rip apart others proffered to you, ignore them, say they say what they dont say, it is what you do, right? I mean thats your schtick out here.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to luckydawg)

Post #: 190

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 2:46:15 PM

luckydawg

Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline

yawn, nope.
See you are using the stupid liberal equivilancy tactic again. And its dumb. All cites are not equall. every Jackass in the world knows that.

What do want a cite for?

I did indeed cite the actuall apology. Actually I simply had to refer to it, since Sanity had previously posted it. I guess you missed it while screaming "sockpuppet". I gave a list of significant differences in the apologies, and you insult, and derail.

And are accusing me of having an army of profiles, thats the funny part. The mods see the Ips and know thats not true at all. But since your obsessed with me, whatever. Have your delusions. I guess all the homosexuall and shit eating insults are projections from in your mind. That ain't my thing, but I guess its yours. I honestly would think that on a kink site using Homophobic insults like you do would be banned, but mod 11 is ok with it.

I got the flu so I am online for a few days. The level of discussion created by Mod 11 is really pretty worthless, so I rarely come in any more. I live in Alaska, and have never pretended otherwise.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 191

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 10/29/2009 7:38:30 PM

servantforuse

Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline

How could Kati Couric possibly have more pro democratic stories that she has now? Her bias towards republicans is blatant and it shows up in the ratings.

(in reply to luckydawg)

Post #: 192

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 11/1/2009 4:41:13 PM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Rep. King exposed the fact that its perfectly alright to be divisive, trashy and three, four, five kinds of vulgar and still have a financial interest in an NFL football team so long as you lean left politically.

quote:

Youtube - King Questions Goodell on Limbaugh Comments

In an October 28, 2009 House Judiciary Committee hearing, Congressman Steve King questions NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell on comments he made regarding Rush Limbaugh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdCimSglD3c&feature=player_embedded

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to kdsub)

Post #: 193

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 11/1/2009 4:42:45 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

good for him, but I see that Don King only runs prizefights.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 194

RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime - 11/1/2009 8:53:27 PM

kdsub

Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Rep. King exposed the fact that its perfectly alright to be divisive, trashy and three, four, five kinds of vulgar and still have a financial interest in an NFL football team so long as you lean left politically.

quote:

Youtube - King Questions Goodell on Limbaugh Comments

In an October 28, 2009 House Judiciary Committee hearing, Congressman Steve King questions NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell on comments he made regarding Rush Limbaugh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdCimSglD3c&feature=player_embedded

I see you have directed this at me...Why...what does it have to do with this thread?

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 195

Page: << < prev 6 7 8 9 [10]

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rush Limbaugh and Dan Rather partners in crime

Page: << < prev 6 7 8 9 [10]

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078