sravaka -> RE: knowing one's slave (10/31/2009 10:53:49 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BitaTruble ~FR~ There are so many areas that one can get to know and some are more important than others. It's vital that Himself knows my medical history so he can make knowledgeable decisions in that regard as well as things like food allergies etc. If he wants me to develop hives, swell and get all red and blotchy, he can do that by telling me to eat an orange. If he doesn't know that my eating an orange will do that to me, then his lack of knowledge can lead to a consequence he did not anticipate and have an undesired result for a given command. Does he need to know my favorite author or the name of the junior high school which I attended? Probably not, although I can't see where that knowledge is going to hurt anything. The trivial tidbits of *me* are not going to effect my service to him but he is certainly entitled to any information he wants from me. I view my lot in life as being the person who makes *his* life easier. Some knowledge of me is going to help in that regard so he doesn't have to assume, perhaps be mistaken in a particular assumption and actually ending up making his life more difficult. Hi Bita.... (and all) I apologize for singling you out... and yet also don't-- you are one of the posters hereabouts from whom I most delight in learning, so it's your own fault if i pick on you. (I mean, poststructuralism on the Gor boards, however long ago?? you're asking for trouble.) :-) I wonder how it felt to you when you were just getting to know your partner. The distinction between potentially perilous allergies and the name of your jr. h.s. I can see, but.... I'm more curious about the middle ground. Or maybe it's not even a middle ground. There's being understood as a slave.... and being understood as a slave plus alpha. You have your quirks, and tastes, and predispositions. You have your history. I am *not* wondering about all this in a "you do this for me, and I'll do this for you" frame of reference. I understand that Master comes first. As a seeking submissive, though, I sometimes find myself.... getting mushy before I should, and recognizing too late in the game that the mushiness is rather one-sided. These are not adequate words-- "mushy" sounds too emotional, and that's not really the point. Maybe this is? I imagine that the vastest part of what makes one think one has found a viable partner is simply the "omg, I want to serve this person and make him/her happy" feeling. But.... I think there needs to be some opposite (though not necessarily equal) force that says, "this is the place I belong, because I am understood, with all (or at least some) of those quirks, tastes, predispositions." Possibly subs/slaves who are more with it than I am do not feel that "Oh! I want to serve!" thing in the absence of feeling that they are wanted in return for their authentic selves. Or, perhaps sometimes they do. And perhaps sometimes it doesn't matter-- it may work out to the same end, in the end. This is what I'm trying to get at: which is true? Or are all of them true? What contingencies lead to differences? Am I making any sense? What do you do when your inclination is to <cough> be serviceable, and the world is full of idiots seeking twits? I am not a twit and do not seek to serve an idiot (separate issues). Somewhere tied up in all of this is a question about *knowledge*-- self-knowledge, other-knowledge, the interaction between them. I think. (Might it be something other than knowledge?) I'm not sure that anyone is looking at this thread anymore, but I do thank everyone who replied.... much valuable food for thought already.... Dare I hope you'll indulge me a little further? Best to all, sravaka
|
|
|
|