Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Brain -> Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/1/2009 11:10:20 PM)

If they don't like it they can lump it.

Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks

One friend of mine put it this way: say Goldman buys a big block of stock from a pension fund in a dark pool. Now they have shares they want to get out of and flatten out their risk. So where do they sell? Well, a big chunk of it might go to the retail schmuck who has no idea what’s going on. He’s buying 1000 shares of whatever at $28, not knowing that Goldman has another 50,000 shares to go. Next thing you know, the schmuck’s shares are at $27.

http://taibbi.rssoundingboard.com/goldman-lobbies-senate-says-full-transparency-sucks




pahunkboy -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/2/2009 6:38:22 AM)

Then I take it to mean GS itself does not know what it is doing?

Paper shredders gone wild perhaps?

Or fraud gone wild?

Of course a crook is not going to show you the stolen loot....  we have the giliteens- and I am pretty sure I personally could lop the head off!




angela120 -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/5/2009 6:36:37 PM)

hi




pahunkboy -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 6:44:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: angela120

hi


Nice pic.  Welcome!




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 7:08:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

If they don't like it they can lump it.

Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks

One friend of mine put it this way: say Goldman buys a big block of stock from a pension fund in a dark pool. Now they have shares they want to get out of and flatten out their risk. So where do they sell? Well, a big chunk of it might go to the retail schmuck who has no idea what’s going on. He’s buying 1000 shares of whatever at $28, not knowing that Goldman has another 50,000 shares to go. Next thing you know, the schmuck’s shares are at $27.

http://taibbi.rssoundingboard.com/goldman-lobbies-senate-says-full-transparency-sucks


Your friend has no point. First, any informed investor knows about the big block of stock sold by the pension fund. Second, investment banks dont "flatten their risk" by buying something and then selling some of it off. Third, if they decided their purchase was a mistake and wanted to sell it, no one with half a brain would flood the market and drive down the price.




slvemike4u -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:22:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: angela120

hi


Nice pic.  Welcome!

Yeah what a nice pic...especially when one considers one of them is supposed to be 38 the other 40.....wow.




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:40:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: angela120

hi


Nice pic.  Welcome!

Yeah what a nice pic...especially when one considers one of them is supposed to be 38 the other 40.....wow.


Just goes to show, nothing keeps you young like wearing Santa hats.




slvemike4u -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:42:02 PM)

Well explain why Santa and Mrs Santa are so damm old?




Slavehandsome -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:45:54 PM)

This is the same reason that transparency on Pentagon projects, The Kennedy Assassination, or 9/11 also sucks.




slvemike4u -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:50:30 PM)

???????????????




Slavehandsome -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:52:13 PM)

This is the same reason that transparency on Pentagon projects, The Kennedy Assassination, or 9/11 also sucks.




slvemike4u -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:56:50 PM)

And again ???????????????????????




Slavehandsome -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:58:17 PM)

As long as you try to overrun my post so it doesn't get scrolled, absolutely. This is the same reason that transparency on Pentagon projects, The Kennedy Assassination, or 9/11 also sucks.




DomKen -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 4:59:20 PM)

What mike, and I, is asking is what are you talking about?




slvemike4u -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/6/2009 5:09:31 PM)

Overrun your post?
How so,by asking what the fuck your trying to say?




xssve -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/7/2009 6:21:16 AM)

Naturally, because transparency on these subjects would most likely prove highly inconvenient for somebody.




rulemylife -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/7/2009 2:02:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavehandsome

As long as you try to overrun my post so it doesn't get scrolled, absolutely. This is the same reason that transparency on Pentagon projects, The Kennedy Assassination, or 9/11 also sucks.


Well, he tried to ask you twice what you meant.

Instead of explaining you just re-posted the same comments.

So, can we get an explanation?




slvemike4u -> RE: Goldman Lobbies Senate, Says Full Transparency Sucks (11/7/2009 2:25:10 PM)

I guess it was self evident.....lol




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125