NihilusZero -> RE: Can you spot a sub? (11/4/2009 1:24:33 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PainfullyCurious I did know that the thought that we are not all creatures of complete spontaneity was upsetting to some. The things you learn in Personality 101, that often people want to act consistently and even at times do things that are similar to others who have a similar trait or disposition do not appeal to everyone. I posted anyway. I knew it was a long shot to think the people who don't find that to be true or interesting would just not be interested in posting. Messege me with ideas. A self-martyrdom appeal to emotion + an underlying argumentum ad hominem. Impressive use of logical fallacies. Does it occur to you that the dissenting comments by anyone here may come from a genuine logical standpoint rather than the emotional defensiveness you want to pretend they are? I am not remotely upset by the fact that humans are, for the most part, predictable variable organic machines. My concern is your mis-correlation between personality types (and their byproducts) to the role someone would play in a personal relationship. Your tone presumes this (to a degree better than chance plus wiggle room) to be factual. It suggests that how your thread title should be read is not "Can you spot a sub?", but "Can you spot a sub?". In which case, your aversion to contrary views isn't entirely unfounded (since the questions were meant only for a select audience). However, for clarification, you should have, instead, asked: "While determining if a sub can be "spotted" by idiosyncrasies may be functionally useless on a case by base basis and, furthermore, not necessarily reliable any more than varying degrees beyond chance, for those of you who do believe that you can divine someone's relationship preferences based on other social quirks, how do you think you do it?"
|
|
|
|