RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring?

RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master

Message

lilrabbit -> RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring? (12/12/2009 6:32:03 PM)
crap never mind, not paying attention to what forum I was in.

sweetsub1957 -> RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring? (12/13/2009 7:37:48 AM)
~Fast Reply~ I would say collar. I have been divorced twice, both were vanilla marriages.When my former Sir collared me, it was until He died. That being said, the collar or the wedding ring are both just outward symbols of an inner commitment.

LanceHughes -> RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring? (12/13/2009 8:07:11 AM)
My Episcopalian upbringing (long since abanded) taught me that Sacraments were "The outward and visible signs of the inward and spiritual grace." I once had a sub memorize that and recite it upon command. So, when I didn't have access to his collar and wanted him to be "more subby," I'd simply say "recite." Oh, and by the way, this string has little in it for gay men since we can't legally marry. Of course, there are committment ceremonies to aid [vanilla] gay couples in forming a bond. And that's a big hint for answering the OP question...... If the committment exists, no ceremony nor object will make it stronger than it is. If the committment does not exist (or no longer exists) no ceremony nor object can make it happen. END OF STRING !

Justme696 -> RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring? (12/13/2009 8:09:37 AM)
quote: If the committment exists, no ceremony nor object will make it stronger than it is. If the committment does not exist (or no longer exists) no ceremony nor object can make it happen. indeed when you commit you commit..no matter what you commit too.

KnightofMists -> RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring? (12/13/2009 8:40:34 AM)
Neither.... and completely irrelevant. The ring... the Collar are only reflections of the relationship style/structure to a small degree... A commitment... is a commitment.... and it's the actions over the course of time that actually build and maintain the commitment that shows to me it's strength and not a ring on a finger a collar on the neck.

LanceHughes -> RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring? (12/13/2009 9:10:14 AM)
Clearly the last poster didn't read my answer. C'mon guys (and gals) let's stop [sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]

KateyCaine -> RE: Which do you consider more of a committment a collar or a wedding ring? (12/13/2009 3:08:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LanceHughes My Episcopalian upbringing (long since abanded) taught me that Sacraments were "The outward and visible signs of the inward and spiritual grace." I once had a sub memorize that and recite it upon command. So, when I didn't have access to his collar and wanted him to be "more subby," I'd simply say "recite." Oh, and by the way, this string has little in it for gay men since we can't legally marry. Of course, there are committment ceremonies to aid [vanilla] gay couples in forming a bond. And that's a big hint for answering the OP question...... If the committment exists, no ceremony nor object will make it stronger than it is. If the committment does not exist (or no longer exists) no ceremony nor object can make it happen. END OF STRING ! APPLAUSE* I couldn't have put it better myself, Lance :) It is all in the heart and intentions of the PERSON making the commitment/pledge to another person - whether it be marriage or a collar. Collars and wedding rings can both be treated as disposable, if there is no honor to the commitment. k :)

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125