FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
FR: The entire incident reeks to me. Some comments: 1. I see it just as likely that no "Christians" made any threats to anyone. 2. I suspect it is just as likely that the "landowner" decided he/she didn't like the sign (for whatever reason), and wanted it gone. The "threats" sound like a good justification made up by someone. 3. What, exactly, are "significant, serious and vicious threats"? If "they" was "significant" and "serious" and "vicious" in a bodily harm sort of way (which is not a fact in evidence), then this is criminal manner. Yet, it doesn't seem to have gotten reported to the police. Interesting. 4. Despite what some may theorize, this would make a great publicity stunt. According to my version of Occam's Razor, that is probably what it is - on the part of the Atheist group who paid to have the bill board put up. After all, if you want to make waves against something you dislike (Christianity, in this case), what better place than Cincinnati, and what better result could you get then "significant, serious and vicious threats" from that group, showing believers to be hypocrites? Kewl beans. Perfect proselytizing atheists triple-play dream. 5. Of course, all of these above thoughts are just based on some assumptions, and "thought models". What I find most interesting, and what leads me to entertain most of them is the utter lack of hard evidence anywhere in this whole imbroglio, thereby allowing everyone to find confirmation of their own particularly prejudices and biases. As has been well demonstrated throughout this thread, starting with the OP. Firm
< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 11/16/2009 8:22:43 AM >
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|