Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates - 11/27/2009 11:06:43 AM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
The durability of the artificial left/right liberal/conservative theater will probably always continue to amaze me.
They tweak policies, but they all follow expansionary policies, endlessly, in bust and boom, leaving the exacerbated structural deficit for later.
And yet, people continue to line up on the sides of the theater, happy to have a part in the play.


Good point. The entire political debate is still being framed by the Cold War, in which you had one side leaning more towards socialism, and expansionist government policies, while the other wanted to rein in government.

But today the old lines are increasingly irrelevant; "Conservatives" are content to deficit spend, and enlarge the Executive Branch, while "liberals" are content to cooperate with corporations in tax breaks and deregulation.
I believe we are seeing the beginnings of a significant realignment of parties, a reshuffling of demographic interests similar to the New Deal.

I think the biggest breakage in party platforms will be the incomatibility of "strong defense" hawkishness with "limited government" fiscal conservatism. This will be mirrored by those who accept a multi-polar world versus the neocons who want American hegemony.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates - 11/27/2009 2:08:36 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

I think the biggest breakage in party platforms will be the incomatibility of "strong defense" hawkishness with "limited government" fiscal conservatism. This will be mirrored by those who accept a multi-polar world versus the neocons who want American hegemony.

Doesn't the fact that none of the neocons can see any contradiction there (this silly Republican round robin is nothing if not proof of that) rather spoil that hope, though?

< Message edited by Moonhead -- 11/27/2009 2:09:12 PM >

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates - 11/27/2009 2:39:23 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline 		Moonhead-
Interestingly, when the modern conservative movement formed in the early 60's, its main animating feature was anti-Communism.
Anti-Communism demanded a robust defense of free market capitalism, but also a strong military defense against the Communist Bloc. Even then, the incompatibility was recognized, but the two ideas were welded together out of necessity.

Now that there is no Communist Bloc, the strong defense pillar is weakened; even stalwart conservatives like Pat Buchanan are questioning our need to be abroad.
The Red Army needed a conventional military to oppose it; but it is increasingly hard to make the argument that a ragtag group of guys with boxcutters demands a military expenditure of some 900 Billion per year.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates - 11/27/2009 2:43:03 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		Point taken.
The spectacle of the CIA spending most of the '50s, '60s and '70s deposing popular and democratically elected foreign leaders and replacing them with fascist * dictators was a horribly depressing one in that light.

*(Unlike many on collarme, I'm using that term correctly. Just look at the Shah or Pinochet.)

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates - 11/27/2009 2:48:05 PM   
InvisibleBlack


Posts: 865
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex
Anti-Communism demanded a robust defense of free market capitalism, but also a strong military defense against the Communist Bloc. Even then, the incompatibility was recognized, but the two ideas were welded together out of necessity.

Now that there is no Communist Bloc, the strong defense pillar is weakened; even stalwart conservatives like Pat Buchanan are questioning our need to be abroad.



Pat Buchanan has become an outright isolationist these days - which at least shows that his conservatism is consistent.

I think you've hit on the core of the problem, though. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Cold War ended. At that point, a re-thinking of American global strategy and objectives was necessary but never occurred. It's hard to justify maintaining a global sphere of influence and the ability to project your power anywhere in the world at a moment's notice when there's no tremendous military threat.

It's also pretty hard to convince your allies in the "hegemony" that they need to listen to you and maintain a huge military base in their nation when they're no longer threatened by real or perceived Communist invasion or insurgency.

I think a strong attempt has been made to pose al-Qaeda or "islamofasicsts" as an equivalent threat requiring an equivalent resposne - but it doesn't really hold up as a large-scale military is not the appropriate tool to use to fight a diverse and widespread terrorist organization. What we're doing is still fighting the last war when what we need to be doing is thinking about how to go about fighting the next one.

_____________________________

Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that, I'll be over here, looking through your stuff.

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates - 11/27/2009 2:52:07 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Point taken.
The spectacle of the CIA spending most of the '50s, '60s and '70s deposing popular and democratically elected foreign leaders and replacing them with fascist * dictators was a horribly depressing one in that light.

*(Unlike many on collarme, I'm using that term correctly. Just look at the Shah or Pinochet.)


or Batista, Somoza, Marcos, Trujillo, or Suharto...off the top of my head. There were others I am sure.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates - 11/27/2009 3:11:24 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		Loads more. Very grim times indeed.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 47
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Purity Resolution for Republican party candidates Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078