lovingpet
Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005 Status: offline
|
You know, I'd love to say that screenames really weed out who I will talk to and who I sense is just a waste of time, but it really hasn't worked out like that. I normally avoid the presence of textspeak, numbers, or whole names that are just letters and numbers with no meaning to the viewer. I'd like to say that I avoid the mention of specific dynamics, roles, or fetishes embedded in a screename. Then again, my partner would have failed on both points. I am more interested in what a person has to say and how they present themselves upon communicating. I have seen fascinating screenames with completely blank profiles and I just thought to myself what a shame that was and what a waste of a really great screename. Some people are just better at coming up with them than others. Oh, and for those taking notes, not that I can't/won't play around in being a person's pet, it isn't even a primary interest. It is just all I could come up with on the spot like that. LOL!!! My screename isn't very indicative of anything. Don't judge a book by it's cover, nor by it's title. Open the pages and then decide. lovingpet
_____________________________
If you put your head into more, you'd have to put your back into less. ~Me 10 Fluffy pts.
|