tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote:
ORIGINAL: AnimusRex quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote:
ORIGINAL: AnimusRex At some point, Congress is going to have to break up the banks like Goldman Sachs and Citibank, as well as AIG, to prevent this kind of mostronsity from happening again. So Big It Will Cause Massive Economic Damage If Allowed To Fail means Too Big to Exist. The fix is as wrong as the original. Care to explain? No, really I am curious as to your take on it. Should they have been bailed out? If not, do you think it would have been a systemic collapse, as most experts predicted? Is there such as thing as a entity so big the government is entitled to break it up? No, there should have been no bailouts and no there would have been no systemic collapse. I disagree that "most experts" even predicted that. Most of the experts you see on TV and read about in the print media, maybe, but not most economists and businessmen overall, it was pretty much evenly divided. And no, there is no entity so big the government is entitled to break it up. Size should have nothing to do with government involvement, because there is a reason companies get big..they are good at what it is they do. Again, government should only be involved when there is a common good with a significant free rider problem (which includes negative externalities and natural monopolies as I use the term "free rider". Essentially any time there is a difference between the social cost and the market cost some entity is free riding ). Again, Ma Bell comes to mind.
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|