France 'Best' Health Care? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Brain -> France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 12:11:44 PM)

This sounds better than the Canadian system which is very good. Nice that they get whatever drugs they need, the Canadian system doesn't cover every drug; although I think drug companies make too much money anyway.

France: 'Best' Health Care?

The French health care system has been dubbed "the best in the world." David Turecamo finds out why the French can afford to get sick.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNR_6UuVl4s




DarkSteven -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 12:15:24 PM)

This brings up an interesting question - what makes a health care system "good"?  If you ask a Democrat, it would be one that gives the best coverage to the most people.  If you ask a Republican, it would be the most affordable.




Moonhead -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 12:24:29 PM)

The American system achieves neither of those though, surely?
The French system is very good. A lot of the rest of Europe is very jealous of it, though by a few accounts I've heard*, the German one is better still.
Given how underfunded the NHS is, that one might be considered better still given how little it costs, though. Yes, there are fusses over ruinously expensive drugs not being supplied, but it still mostly works most of the time, despite the fact that it's had its funding cut in every budget for the last thirty years.

*(Mostly from Germans, who have an axe to grind on this, perhaps)




cuckoldmepls -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 12:33:38 PM)

PBS the most liberal network on tv concluded that the Japanese system was the best in the world. When It comes to liberal ideas, i would bet my money that they are right on this one.

The great thing about the Japanese system is that their employers still provide medical insurance to their employees, but they also have a community based plan for those people who fall through the cracks. Now thats a solution that provides universal healthcare and still keeps big government out of the picture.

That's the real solution.




Brain -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 12:37:42 PM)

I think the French system is more affordable based on the amounts they said in the video. I think the American system is the least affordable because the United States spends twice as much money as the French on health care and almost 50 million people are not covered; for me that’s not acceptable.

And, I also want to add something needs to be done about Joe Lieberman because he’s blocking healthcare reform for the entire country, even though the overwhelming majority of Americans demand reform. It’s not acceptable that he has sold out to health insurance corporate profits; he and his wife are corporate whores.

Obama needs to make Lieberman pay a severe price for his obstruction; that includes the entire state of Connecticut being denied earmarks or whatever other federal money Connecticut receives.




Moonhead -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 12:38:23 PM)

Who did they say paid for the community based plan, if the government isn't involved?
(And if we're invoking "big government" the Japanese Government is a lot slimmer than anything you've had in your country since you wiped a couple of their cities off the map.)




Brain -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 12:46:27 PM)

I think the French system is more affordable based on the amounts they said in the video. I think the American system is the least affordable because the United States spends twice as much money as the French on health care and almost 50 million people are not covered; for me that’s not acceptable.

And, I also want to add something needs to be done about Joe Lieberman because he’s blocking healthcare reform for the entire country, even though the overwhelming majority of Americans demand reform. It’s not acceptable that he has sold out to health insurance corporate profits; he and his wife are corporate whores.

Obama needs to make Lieberman pay a severe price for his obstruction; that includes the entire state of Connecticut being denied earmarks or whatever other federal money Connecticut receives. And it should be obvious Joe Lieberman should not be chairing any committees in the Senate.




DarkSteven -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:13:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

And, I also want to add something needs to be done about Joe Lieberman because he’s blocking healthcare reform for the entire country, even though the overwhelming majority of Americans demand reform. It’s not acceptable that he has sold out to health insurance corporate profits; he and his wife are corporate whores.

Obama needs to make Lieberman pay a severe price for his obstruction; that includes the entire state of Connecticut being denied earmarks or whatever other federal money Connecticut receives. And it should be obvious Joe Lieberman should not be chairing any committees in the Senate.



Brain, do you have any clue whatsoever what you are saying?!?!?!

When Terri Schiavo was about to have her plug pulled and the judges failed to stop it, some right wing wackos decreed that the judges ought to be subject to Congressional actions should Congress not be pleased.  That plan rightly created an uproar that helped unseat the conservative GOP.

The very idea of a President punishing a Senator for not voting his way violates the concept of three independent branches of government.  It's the responsibility of the Executive and Legislative branches to sell the other branch their ideas, not to beat the other one up if they don't buy in.  In theory, that leads to both branches working together.

Your bright idea would result in a completely dysfunctional system run on fear and hatred.  Learn to appreciate the strong points of the current system before you propose its destruction.




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:26:40 PM)

I agree with both of you, to an extent. The President's power to discipline a legislator is, and should be, limited. But in our system,  it's entirely appropriate for the party leadership to exact penalties on legislators who don't support the party on key issues.

In fact, that power is limited as well, and that's as it should be. But it's not at all out of line for party leaders to use committee assignments, etc. to reward or punish members for how they do their jobs. That's just politics. It's a tough business, and I very much look forward to the day the Democratic leadership decides they can finally afford to cut Lieberman's worthless balls off at high noon on the steps of the US Capitol.




vincentML -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:27:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

The American system achieves neither of those though, surely?
The French system is very good. A lot of the rest of Europe is very jealous of it, though by a few accounts I've heard*, the German one is better still.
Given how underfunded the NHS is, that one might be considered better still given how little it costs, though. Yes, there are fusses over ruinously expensive drugs not being supplied, but it still mostly works most of the time, despite the fact that it's had its funding cut in every budget for the last thirty years.

*(Mostly from Germans, who have an axe to grind on this, perhaps)


I am curious to know how the NHS is funded. Is there any earmarked tax? The VAT? Income? Payroll? Or all lumped into a general budget? Thanks.




vincentML -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:28:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

I agree with both of you, to an extent. The President's power to discipline a legislator is, and should be, limited. But in our system,  it's entirely appropriate for the party leadership to exact penalties on legislators who don't support the party on key issues.

In fact, that power is limited as well, and that's as it should be. But it's not at all out of line for party leaders to use committee assignments, etc. to reward or punish members for how they do their jobs. That's just politics. It's a tough business, and I very much look forward to the day the Democratic leadership decides they can finally afford to cut Lieberman's worthless balls off at high noon on the steps of the US Capitol.



Probably only if the Dems pick up more seats in the Senate which is highly unlikely, dont you think?




Justme696 -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:30:10 PM)

Weird. never heard the French health system beeing mentioned as the best one overhere.




vincentML -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:33:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

When Terri Schiavo was about to have her plug pulled and the judges failed to stop it, some right wing wackos decreed that the judges ought to be subject to Congressional actions should Congress not be pleased.  That plan rightly created an outroar that helped unseat the conservative GOP.

The very idea of a President punishing a Senator for not voting his way violates the concept of three independent branches of government.  It's the responsibility of the Executive and Legislative branches to sell the other branch their ideas, not to beat the other one up if they don't buy in.  In theory, that leads to both branches working together.

Your bright idea would result in a completely dysfunctional system run on fear and hatred.  Learn to appreciate the strong points of the current system before you propose its destruction.



Right. At the present time we have only a partially dysfunctional system. Don't mess it up, Brian, with your crazy ideas!

Sorry, Steven. I do agree with you mostly. Just couldn't resist being a wiseass.




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:33:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

I agree with both of you, to an extent. The President's power to discipline a legislator is, and should be, limited. But in our system,  it's entirely appropriate for the party leadership to exact penalties on legislators who don't support the party on key issues.

In fact, that power is limited as well, and that's as it should be. But it's not at all out of line for party leaders to use committee assignments, etc. to reward or punish members for how they do their jobs. That's just politics. It's a tough business, and I very much look forward to the day the Democratic leadership decides they can finally afford to cut Lieberman's worthless balls off at high noon on the steps of the US Capitol.



Probably only if the Dems pick up more seats in the Senate which is highly unlikely, dont you think?


Yeah, I know. Probably not in my lifetime. But damn, just once before i kack I'd like to see the Dems grow a pair and play some fucking hardball.




vincentML -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:40:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

I agree with both of you, to an extent. The President's power to discipline a legislator is, and should be, limited. But in our system,  it's entirely appropriate for the party leadership to exact penalties on legislators who don't support the party on key issues.

In fact, that power is limited as well, and that's as it should be. But it's not at all out of line for party leaders to use committee assignments, etc. to reward or punish members for how they do their jobs. That's just politics. It's a tough business, and I very much look forward to the day the Democratic leadership decides they can finally afford to cut Lieberman's worthless balls off at high noon on the steps of the US Capitol.



Probably only if the Dems pick up more seats in the Senate which is highly unlikely, dont you think?


Yeah, I know. Probably not in my lifetime. But damn, just once before i kack I'd like to see the Dems grow a pair and play some fucking hardball.



Their only option, as far as I know, is to make a rule change in the Senate for majority roll call, killing the Holy Filibuster for good. That raises a lot of small state vs big state issues. Too many Dems from small states to surrender that advantage I suspect.




Moonhead -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 1:45:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

The American system achieves neither of those though, surely?
The French system is very good. A lot of the rest of Europe is very jealous of it, though by a few accounts I've heard*, the German one is better still.
Given how underfunded the NHS is, that one might be considered better still given how little it costs, though. Yes, there are fusses over ruinously expensive drugs not being supplied, but it still mostly works most of the time, despite the fact that it's had its funding cut in every budget for the last thirty years.

*(Mostly from Germans, who have an axe to grind on this, perhaps)


I am curious to know how the NHS is funded. Is there any earmarked tax? The VAT? Income? Payroll? Or all lumped into a general budget? Thanks.

General budget. It's funded out of the tax revenue, which is mostly Income tax (these days most people's employers deduct it at source, so it's probably considered payroll tax). I don't think NI goes towards it as that's reserved for contribution based benefits, and the State pension, assuming that still exists when the people who are paying NI now hit retirement age, which looks increasingly unlikely.




vincentML -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 2:14:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead



General budget. It's funded out of the tax revenue, which is mostly Income tax (these days most people's employers deduct it at source, so it's probably considered payroll tax). I don't think NI goes towards it as that's reserved for contribution based benefits, and the State pension, assuming that still exists when the people who are paying NI now hit retirement age, which looks increasingly unlikely.


Thank you, Moon. As you may have noticed we are having a fierce fight over here (USA) and there is so much lying going round it's hard to get at the nut of it. We have huge future shortfalls awaiting in both our Medicare/Medicaid Systems and our Social Security System (your NI, I think). Our Medicare pays out over 90% of revenues toward health care while, I have heard, our private insurance based system pays out only about 72%, the rest going for profits and Administrative costs. Difficult to weed through the tall grass of bullshit and figure out what the truth is.

Vincent




Brain -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 3:27:05 PM)



That's bull, George Bush and the Republicans do it all the time. How do you think Republicans continue to vote in a unified block all the time? Cripes, have you forgotten Tom DeLay? He was the nastiest SOB that ever worked in the Congress, wheeling and dealing all the time.

Obama had better do something about this cockroach, Lieberman, that's all I have to say otherwise people are going to be really pissed off with Lieberman AND Obama.

Medicare buy-in plan runs into resistance

Sen. Lieberman declares proposal a bad deal for taxpayers and the deficit

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34408699/ns/health-health_care/




Moonhead -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 3:29:46 PM)

I hear you. I always find astonishing that you haven't set up a federal agency to run this and started funding it through taxes before now. I suppose the insurers don't like the idea, as they're rabidly opposed to even the most trivial reforms, aren't they?




Moonhead -> RE: France 'Best' Health Care? (12/14/2009 3:31:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain



That's bull, George Bush and the Republicans do it all the time. How do you think Republicans continue to vote in a unified block all the time? Cripes, have you forgotten Tom DeLay? He was the nastiest SOB that ever worked in the Congress, wheeling and dealing all the time.

Obama had better do something about this cockroach, Lieberman, that's all I have to say otherwise people are going to be really pissed off with Lieberman AND Obama.

Medicare buy-in plan runs into resistance

Sen. Lieberman declares proposal a bad deal for taxpayers and the deficit

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34408699/ns/health-health_care/


Why is Leiberman Obama's problem? I thought he was meant to be an independent?




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875