RE: Ignore Lieberman to Win Real Health Care Reform AND Joe Lieberman must go (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Brain -> RE: Ignore Lieberman to Win Real Health Care Reform AND Joe Lieberman must go (12/18/2009 5:32:04 AM)


I don't hate corporations; that's bullshit. I hate when corporations do bad things like the woman in Texas with breast cancer; she was told her acne was a pre-existing condition so they canceled her insurance and she died. Or this:

ChevronTexaco: Ecuador's Black Plague

Chevron operated an oil concession in Ecuador's rainforest from 1964 to 1992. The company admits during this time that it dumped 18 billion gallons of toxic waste in an area that was home to six indigenous nationalities -- one of which is now extinct. For the last four decades, Chevron has treated Ecuador as an image problem to be managed rather than a humanitarian crisis that compels a compassionate and real solution. When one connects Chevron's dots in Ecuador, what emerges is a coordinated series of frauds marked by misinformation designed to deceive courts, the public, shareholders, and the financial markets. The purpose of this scheme is to avoid paying the cost of a real cleanup, and it matters not that vulnerable rainforest peoples -- among them thousands of children -- have died or suffer grievously as a result.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXeaO5skSSI&NR=1

Corporations need to be appropriately regulated. Like the Glass–Steagall Act for Wall Street (thanks for nothing Phil Graham, former Republican senator From Texas and Senior John McCain campaign advisor, for getting rid of Glass–Steagall, you fucking moron for almost causing another depression).

And health insurance companies like Blue Cross still operate in Canada and make money. They provide all the bells and whistles of healthcare insurance, private rooms and any prescription drug your doctor prescribes and so on. I’m not against companies, I supported Ronald Reagan, Brian Mulroney, and Margaret Thatcher. I used to be very conservative but the Republican party has become too extreme. There is nothing conservative about denying global warming. And what ever happened to being a fiscal conservative? George W. Bush didn’t veto one spending bill, and his very first veto was to block stem cell research.

My friend is a Conservative member of Parliament, MP, in the House of Commons in the Harper government. In fact, I still consider myself a conservative because his father was a gynaecologist and my MP friend has always been in favor of abortion. I remember him arguing about abortion with another friend who became a Catholic priest.

Ronald Regan left Lebanon. Does that mean Ronald Reagan is cut and run? I'm sorry to say this but like Andrew Sullivan and other conservatives I think the right wing has fallen off the cliff. The party better lose/manage the wing nuts or it may risk its relevancy. People are not happy with the Democratic Party but they are less happy with Republicans.



quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Brain, I would be interested in knowing just where you invest your own 401 plan or other retirement savings ? It is evident that you hate corporations. Where do you invest ? Just curious..





willbeurdaddy -> RE: Ignore Lieberman to Win Real Health Care Reform AND Joe Lieberman must go (12/18/2009 2:19:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

For one thing, 67% of the people of/in Connecticut want a public option and for another Howard is not naïve like Ned Lamont to take a picture with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton: that's why Ned lost, when I saw that pic I knew it would hurt Lamont; Connecticut does not want
NYC ( Tawana Brawley rape allegations ) shit politics in their state.

Willbeur didn't see the video on TV of that picture being taken and all camera lightbulbs flashing otherwise he wouldn't say, "Dean would have no chance against Lieberman. "

Ned Lamont would be the senator from Connecticut NOW if not for that picture. With all the BULLSHIT Joe Loserman has done since, NOW Lieberman could not win an election to be a dog catcher!

quote:

ORIGINAL: tnai

quote:

Howard would destroy the weasel...


How are you coming to that conclusion? Has someone run a poll or anything or that just your two cents? Not saying you are wrong or right but what evidence are you basing this conclusion on?




cue up a reprise of "Clueless"

"Yet polling data suggest that Connecticut voters are unlikely to be too angry with Lieberman.

After Lieberman first announced his opposition to the pubic option this fall, a study by Quinnipiac University Poll found that Connecticut voters approved of how Lieberman was handling his job, 49 to 44 percent. More specifically, 64 percent said that even if Lieberman was involved in a filibuster of the Democratic healthcare plan, he ought to keep his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

“The public option is popular in Connecticut, but people didn’t care enough about it to affect their opinion of Lieberman,” says Schwartz, director of Quinnipiac University Poll""




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125