Public exposure (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


Baldbalzs -> Public exposure (12/25/2009 6:45:05 AM)

How many Mistresses publicely expose their slave naked or almost naked in public to other Dommes or to strangers. For the purpose of control, or just for fun




EbonyWood -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 6:57:28 AM)

Looks down. Not a mistress, but I'm strolling by and can tell you a couple of things.
 
The answer will be almost none or none. Or should be.
 
It is really bad form to expose nonconsenting others ie the public to your kink, especially humiliation/punishment based activity.
 
There IS some public play, but really flagrant activity is rare outside a group munch.




LadyPact -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 7:12:59 AM)

It depends on how you use the word "public".  BDSM club, yes.  Play party or event put together where other people are involved in wiitwd, yes.  Random public space where I'm not absolutely certain I'm within kink friendly company, no.




SolangeRichards -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 7:17:16 AM)

Agreed, why make strangers part of the scene?

OK, so the OP gets off on the idea of being forced to go nude in a public place. 

Great, but I went to the park to toss a frisbee around.  Why is he dragging me into his sex life?




CarrieO -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 7:28:58 AM)

OP,

There are many threads to be found on public play and involving mainstream society.  Here's my christmas gift to you... http://www.collarchat.com/m_2706634/mpage_1/tm.htm

Seek and ye shall find.

And for the record...if I'm out to dinner with my mom, neither of us have any desire to be part of your kink.  Just because you and your domme enjoy humiliation doesn't mean my mom needs to be part of it.  Doing this sort of activity among kink-friendly people who, within the appropriate venue, accept and approve is fine.

It's all about respect, imo.




slavekal -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 8:08:27 AM)

There are some Mistresses who employ public humiliation, although nudity is rarely a part of that scene.  At a fetish party, yes, but not on the street.  Mistress Sahara Eve has a lot of clips on her site where she leads crawling men on leashes through the city streets and in the park.  She has used naked men in public too, but those clips appeared to be at a clothing optional venue, possible Hedonism or some place like that.  It is not at all uncommon for a Mistress to display her slave to a girlfriend or two at home.




HarryVanWinkle -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 11:12:43 AM)

This sounds like it would violate one of my very few  limits, that being anything likely to make me wind up in jail.




slavekal -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 4:51:33 PM)

Having a leash around your neck is not against the law. Public nudity is another matter.




Sanguinarian -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 5:03:25 PM)

If there is any chance, however minutely that, say, 'uns or ANYone for that matter not wanting to see someone else in such a position.... it shouldn't be done.

Think about all the bad publicity this lifestyle already gets. Let's not give the idiots who haven't a clue more ammo to use, shall we?




Michael3001 -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 5:37:52 PM)

What about those gays who kiss in public? They really offend me. Where does the line get drawn? When something sexual is happening or when somethings just a little eccentric like say a transsexual walking down the street in a pair of high heels?[8|]




jackod -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 6:19:53 PM)

Is more common in Europe,jack,los angeles




Sanguinarian -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 6:23:00 PM)

I tend to dislike most public displays of affection that include fluid exchange. Which means kissing as well. My personal opinion is if you want a peck-type kiss, go for it. Sucking your partner's liver out of their body through their mouth.... no.

As for the transexuals, I've seen some that look classy and elegant, and then the ones thousands into the negative on that scale. Depends on the situation, I guess. If they can pull it off, and not be blatant and disgusting, feel free.

Unless of course you happen to live in an area that has laws against such things. I hear certain sexual acts are still illegal in Boston Mass. How they would enforce that law might be interesting.....




Underumam -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 6:50:17 PM)

What does deep-throat kissing have to do with being naked in public? lol.




Sanguinarian -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 6:52:57 PM)

Pretty much the same thing as just plain old deep-throating. 




DarkSteven -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 6:58:09 PM)

I'm getting the feeling that "transsexual" is being used in place of "crossdresser".

A trans is someone that has taken surgery and/or hormones to become another gender than one was born.  A crossdresser is someone that simply dresses in the clothes of another gender.




slavekal -> RE: Public exposure (12/25/2009 7:06:14 PM)

At the riverfront and all the outdoor street fairs and art festivals, I serve as rickshaw boy for Ms. Mlicious. This is an obvious form of male submission in public. The reactions we get are overwhelmingly positive. People often break into applause.




SolangeRichards -> RE: Public exposure (12/26/2009 3:57:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Michael3001

What about those gays who kiss in public? They really offend me. Where does the line get drawn? When something sexual is happening or when somethings just a little eccentric like say a transsexual walking down the street in a pair of high heels?[8|]


Don't worry, just as I said I don't want to be dragged into a stranger's sex life, I promise not to drag you into mine....




SilverMark -> RE: Public exposure (12/26/2009 4:03:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Michael3001

What about those gays who kiss in public? They really offend me. Where does the line get drawn? When something sexual is happening or when somethings just a little eccentric like say a transsexual walking down the street in a pair of high heels?[8|]


I would wonder if you are just as offended by a hetro couple kissing? and since when is kissing a sexual act?

I hang out with a couple of the most marvelous people who are in committed relationships and they act no different than any hetero couple does and although the idea of me kissing a man would absolutely freak me out, I understand affection between two people no matter their particular sexual orientation.




SweetDommes -> RE: Public exposure (12/26/2009 2:22:19 PM)

Kissing in the way that some people do it is quite sexual - they seem to require some version of petting involved - and that bothers me no matter what gender the partners may be. Signs of affection (quick kisses, holding hands, hugging, etc.) are fine - but a lot of people take that way too far.

I'm with the others on this board - people who can't consent shouldn't be exposed to it. If you show up somewhere naked, they don't have the option to consent or not and it shouldn't be done. Wearing a leash isn't exactly appropriate in most places either.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875