RE: would i be accepted

RE: would i be accepted (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: would i be accepted (12/26/2009 9:16:16 AM)
Thanks, but I dont' think I'll push things. No fun being moderated. When I'm actively participating in public/private play parties - "the community", for me, are those I enjoy being around, watching or otherwise hanging out with. When I first became involved in BDSM, I had a much more romanticized belief in 'the community'. Experience will sometimes taint your view on things, I guess. Experience, court appearanes testifying on behalf of 'the community', and having your home aired on the evening news does that too. I also felt a sense of "community" with certain people on the CM message board, once upon a time. Although I don't think I ever made the leap by associating those I felt a sense of community with, with the broader implication of "THE Community." WinD

osf -> RE: would i be accepted (12/26/2009 9:29:22 AM)
quote: Experience, court appearanes testifying on behalf of 'the community', and having your home aired on the evening news does that too. that sucks must have been a " for a good time call winsome " period

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: would i be accepted (12/26/2009 9:36:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: Experience, court appearanes testifying on behalf of 'the community', and having your home aired on the evening news does that too. that sucks must have been a " for a good time call winsome " period [:D] That's pretty funny, wrong, but still pretty hilarious. My "for a good time call Winsome" period had an entirely DIFFERENT outcome...but that's another tale for another ay. WinD

osf -> RE: would i be accepted (12/26/2009 9:37:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: Experience, court appearanes testifying on behalf of 'the community', and having your home aired on the evening news does that too. that sucks must have been a " for a good time call winsome " period [:D] That's pretty funny, wrong, but still pretty hilarious. My "for a good time call Winsome" period had an entirely DIFFERENT outcome...but that's another tale for another ay. WinD tease

SPnEroticaone -> RE: would i be accepted (12/26/2009 9:59:46 AM)
WAIT!!!! Who's certifying the certifiers???????

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: would i be accepted (12/26/2009 10:32:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SPnEroticaone WAIT!!!! Who's certifying the certifiers??????? The Subbie Mafia,of course....

QuirkyAnne -> RE: would i be accepted (12/27/2009 7:06:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance I can be pretty descriptive - so it probably isn't for the faint of heart. Should I elaborate more on the pale fishbelly types who wear black socks while naked, or the warty testicles or the 'if I try and look stern while standing naked in a pair of black socks and a sporting bit of shrinkage due to the 'chill air' - I'll look dominate enough for approval type? Just wondering how much of an inquiring mind you really have. WinD Ah, the memories! Thanks for bringing them up. I now have to go stomp them back into my subconscious and drink a 5th of vodka to drown out the horror... ;-) Anne

crazyml -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 6:29:57 AM)
Does anyone have a spare 13amp fuse? My Jackass detector has just blown.

CaringandReal -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:31:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OttersSwim quote: ORIGINAL: lally2 quote: ORIGINAL: OttersSwim At the end of the day, a troll is a troll and just like I did when he came here, I am calling "Troll" on the OP. If you look back on his threads, and his endless stream of useless, non-engaging, one line responses to nearly every post back to him...what is the added value count? *Zero* ...do not feed the energy creature... hm, but many of his one liners have infact lead the thread forward - im just saying that i dont believe osf is the troll i thought he was when he first arrived. he does make a contribution when there are one or two who frankly dont, they just antagonise and fling their opinions around the place in an aggressive and arrogant way. i tend to put them on 'hide' though. Forward yes, into the next baited segment. This guy is just amusing himself at our expense and to my mind contributing nothing to the community as of yet. He plays the clever gadfly and I have seen so many of his kind on this and other forums. I have no use for gadflies who hide their real intent behind clever or abbreviated leading responses just to get a rise. Do not feed the energy creature. You prefer all the cuntish snark attacks that go on here to _this_? I guess you must, as I almost never hear you speaking out when some innocent newbie is gang-mobbed by the largely submissive and vaguely female Leather Goddesses of Phobos gang! You're the one doing the active trolling/baiting in this thread with you constant "Do not feed the energy creature." So, I think I ought to take your advice and...

subtee -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:35:20 AM)
~FR Sometimes I think he's Bob. Bob? Is that you?

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:37:19 AM)
O.o No, can't be. Bob never conceded a point....not that I recall.

Jeffff -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:38:07 AM)
And no mention of a dead wife. Jeff

Mercnbeth -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:41:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subtee ~FR Sometimes I think he's Bob. Bob? Is that you? quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance O.o No, can't be. Bob never conceded a point....not that I recall. Nah....No dead wife brought out soliciting for sympathy, and a 'mercy-submission'.

subtee -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:41:59 AM)
Yeah...you're both right. For sure the dead wife would have had umpteen mentions by now...

Jeffff -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:42:28 AM)
lol.... get out of my head! Jeff

osf -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:42:30 AM)
if some are against bob then already i think i like him

subtee -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:43:41 AM)
I can see that about you. You're reactionary.

osf -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:45:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subtee I can see that about you. You're reactionary. proreactionary is that contradictory?

mnottertail -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:46:19 AM)
How do people in colder climes feel about the concept of fur lined rubbers? Ron

subtee -> RE: would i be accepted (12/28/2009 9:48:58 AM)
Um, I think it's gibberish? Perhaps it seems proactive to start threads, asking questions, seeking knowledge. But. I wonder if the intent is to learn or to react?

Page: << < prev 3 4 5 [6] 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125