Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Misogyny and BDSM


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Misogyny and BDSM Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 9:31:59 AM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

That's what sales is, delivering the goods better than the next guy. Closing the deal.  It's fucking hard work. Glengarry Glen Ross, best movie ever on the ruthlessness of sales. It ain't Mary Kay we're talking about. Add to that this is Maine and it's very much a male dominated business, well....I earn my money.





Not to derail, but you are so right; Glengarry Glen Ross is the ultimate sales movie. I am in ruthless sales myself (NYC media biz) and believe me, you use everything at your disposal to sell in such a competitive market. I am always told that women are better at sales, but I have seen evidence that even with superior skill, some women do not get paid as much as their male counterparts, even in these supposedly enlightened times.





I love Glengarry.....I used to sell cars in california....anyone seen the movie used cars? Me = Rudy Russo and my boss was Jack Worden in the powder blue suit


Used Cars is great...I don't identify with anyone in Glengarry (no saleswomen, right?) but I have had bosses like Alec Baldwin's character and certainly have worked around guys like that crew.  I also saw the Broadway version of Glengarry  and it was even more powerful live.

Every salesperson should see that as required viewing and never forget your ABC's. (always be closing for those who are not familiar. :)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 261
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 9:36:21 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I sorta identified with ricky or rico or whoever al pacino was:

Fuck you!!!!! Fuck you!!!! I want my fuckin' caddillac!!!!!!

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 262
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 9:45:25 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Using fast reply...

I've been thinking a lot about this topic since I first read it yesterday and haven't been able to get back to it until this morning. My mind bouncing all around.

First was brought up a thread awhile back, on feminism, that got completely out of hand and made several people look absolutely horrid. The depths sunk to to try and cop a 'win' were revolting. It created a lasting impression in my mind of two people particularly that will forever be a negative. One person, that while apparently intelligent, and per her age should be more mature, ended up appearing mentally unstable. The other, simply childish, petty, and vastly immature. But that is their legacy, not mine and not one I will allow myself to identify with.......simply because I share their gender.

Two thoughts come to mind when such vitrol is seen/heard. Insecurity and fear of something not known or not understood, breeds hatred. It doesn't matter what the unknown or misunderstood is......race, gender, political leaning, whatever......the insecure human instinct is to fight or flee. We hate to flee so we stand and fight......human nature. How we fight, is determined by many thing, but on here........we use words. All too often allowing our emotions to take control and show ourselves in our worst light, defeating our purpose. We only end up alienating one another further. Lose lose situation.

There is a male I know of, that is apparently quite happy in service to a mistress that believes strongly in female supremacy. Yet, I also know that he has, quite violently, topped submissive women. While he has labeled himself dominant/switch, what I see is a man that is so impassioned about how he views women, he cannot wrap his mind around the existence of submissive women. His inability to accept their life path as being beautiful and right for them, is expressed in violent sadism towards them. I cannot imagine the torturous things going on in his head over all of that nor how his owner would allow it, if indeed she still does, but it is to me, the perfect example of trying to destroy what we do not understand therefor fear.

Another thought, something I have been considering lately in my own life. What we focus on, we give energy and power.

I said I do not see misogyny, because it is a negative in my mind. Something I somehow, without conscious thought, chose to avoid giving any power. So, it ceases to exist in my world. I have no conscious memory of ANYone ever treating me in a way that would lead me to believe they dislike me because of my gender. None.

I realize that the activists in the world will see what I am saying as refusing to acknowledge it exists. I understand that and to them and how they think and deal with the world, it is correct. It is simply not correct for me and how I deal with the world.

I prefer activism by example. I behave in a manner that creates an energy for what I WANT to see, therefor that is what I see.
In a bigger picture, I strive to be a person that my words and more importantly, actions, are consistent and respected. To be a leader in some small way but in a way that matters. Less so by strident words and focus on the negative but instead my personal behaviour, my actions, where I focus MY energy.

It has been proven over and over throughout time, where energy is focused, whatever that energy is focused on, flourishes.

I don't want grow hate and fear.

There are many many lifestyles, differences, etc........that I know are not for me. Things I do not want in My life. Yet, for some, they are positive choices or even moreso, life paths. Just because I know without doubt they are not for me, because I do not understand all of their nuances, or how someone can live that way happily, does not give me license to deem it wrong for someone else. It doesn't make sense for me to focus MY energy on trying to demean someone else's truth.

I still struggle with all of this, especially when it comes to religioun and politics...........but I keep trying.




_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to happylittlepet)
Profile   Post #: 263
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 9:45:34 AM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline
Oh yeah...Ricky Roma was the best. Totally arrogant, no ethics and played by Al Pacino. What's not to like? Liev Schreiber who is an awesome actor played Ricky on stage, totally different than Pacino but just as intense.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 264
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 9:54:45 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Ya gotta love Lat.................




Jeff

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 265
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 9:54:47 AM   
Kimveri


Posts: 783
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Vegas
Status: offline
Heya, Lucienne,

Ok, back from work, let's wrassle these idears! ;-P

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
I get the impression that a person is not considered sufficiently well-versed in the Gorean lifestyle to pass judgment until that judgment is "the Gorean lifestyle is TEH AWESOME!"


I've obviously been unclear. ALL I'm saying is....if you must make a general summary statement about a thing, at least do the personal work to check & confirm the sources you rely upon. IF you elect to rely on fringe sources with little or no actual study/knowledge under their belt, don't be surprised when those who HAVE done their homewrok inform you that you're mistaken.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
I don't need to became an expert on Gor to realize it's not something that works for me.


No, you don't....but you MAY want to learn enough to discern the difference between the experts & those who have little more than a passing interest. At least, if you're going to make blanket statements in public fora...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
This attitude of "tear off the blinds of ignorance and see the way to a better life!"... well, it's a bit too evangelical for my tastes.


Hehe...good point. I do get a bit dramatic, I suppose. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll try to be a bit more pragmatic & reasonable. BTW, I tend to do the same thing to those within the Gorean community who make mistaken statements such as "ALL women are slaves" or "there's no homosexuals in Gor". So it's really not limited to those who disagree with things Gorean.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri
Animus is not even a Gorean, let alone the author of the whole series, but go ahead, get medical information from the busdriver who drives past the hospital every day......


From my observation, Animus is an intelligent poster who has taken the time to learn more about Goreans than I care to.


I was, in no way, disagreeing with this statement.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
His statement was consistent with what I've read Goreans writing about their deal, and (from my memory) it stood uncontensted in a long thread where people were actively correcting what they considered misimpressions.


I do not recall the specific passage, but if you can give me a tad more to go on, I'll hunt it down & do my best to delve deeper. Sometimes a statement goes uncontested because there are larger issues at hand, not because it's something we all agree with.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
Instead of challenging his credentials to speak, could you perhaps explain why the statement is incorrect? (Keeping in mind that I'm working from memory here and what is important is the statement about the Enlightenment, not who wrote it).


First, I did not challenge Animus' credentials to speak. I questioned your citing him as a pivotal source for Gorean information. As I said above, if you can help me narrow the search a bit, I'll gladly address your question. I think it'd be interesting! :-D

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
Or is ad hominem argument a founding principle of Gor?


Ok, I understand that tone & inflection are absent, but I'm having real trouble seeing where you got the impression that I am making personal insults against anyone here. I do not view sharing the fact that Animus has not, to my knowledge, ever declared himself "a Gorean" as in ANY way an insult. It's not an admission of inferiority to NOT be Gorean, ffs! Perhaps a re-reading might be in order before making accusations?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
There it is again, the religious undertones. Terrible shame John Norman couldn't get in touch with his inner L. Ron Hubbard and formalize this for you. First... there was the WORD.


I don't know you well enough to assume this is snark, so I'll go with humor. I'm not seeing anything "religious" in my remarks at all. I see lots of positive psychological ideas & not a bit of it has been pulled from any religious dogma. I happen to be an anti-religion person, but that's a WHOLE 'nother topic!

If it's coming off that way, I'm going to seriously re-think the way I speak of psychology, sociology & the intricacies of philosophy & morality. I do not seek to "convert" people to some sort of rules-based moral paradigm, but rather to encourage personally defined & informed discussions on any & all topics.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
I don't know where talk of excuses and victim mentalities came from. I am responsible for my knowledge and lack thereof. I have enough information to know that the Gorean lifestyle neither appeals to or threatens me.


It was a general "you" not a personal or specific " you, Lucienne". I will, however, disagree with the suggestion that you have enough "information" to "know" Gor sufficiently to make generalized statements as though they are anything but an opinion of a mostly unknown philosophy.

What you decide is appropriate for yourself is your decision & I fully support you in making that based on anything &/or nothing at all. It is your life & you should, imo, live it fully to your own standards & liking. (BTW, that's a foundational Gorean principle....).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri
Do it....or don't....but you'll get nothing but contempt from me if you rely on others instead of coming here with the actual "blood" of your own kill to discuss.


I'll set aside my excitement caused by talk of blood and kills for a moment to point out how silly this is. You've got your one true path and you won't respect those who don't walk it?


Ohhh, no no! I didn't mean it that way at all! Let me clarify.

In an open discussion forum, when someone makes a sweeping statement on a thing I expect them to have arrived at that conclusion due to the results of their own study. When I find that the remark is based solely on the opinions of third-parties, & especially when those third parties are not even adherents to the matter at hand (i.e. Gor)....well....then I have little but contempt for their statement. It's not the person I regard thusly, it's the stance they've taken in the discussion.

I don't know you, as a person, to form an opinion of you one way or the other. I'm focused totally on the topic at hand & the soundness of the statements. Sorry about the misunderstanding.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
You have your own board for people who are actively living the Gorean lifestyle. Feel free to spread your contempt for idle observers, but it just looks silly on a general discussion board.


Ahem....the Gorean Forum is open to anyone wishing to discuss things Gorean, regardless of their expertise, as per the CM TOS. I am assuming those same rules apply here...therefore...I may discuss here should I choose to, as long as I am on-topic & within the TOS guidelines.

Also, my contempt is not for the idle observer but rather for the vocal condemnatory participant who knows only the opinions of others & cares not a whit if they are misinformed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
Now, back to my excitement regarding blood and kills. Not choosing a Gorean lifestyle doesn't mean that I disagree with absolutely every tenet or value espoused. And I think Goreans tend to come across as vainglorious when they assume as much.


I made no such assumption. I was speaking against the blanket-style statement, not whatever sum-total of beliefs you may or may not hold. Again, I do not know you well enough to speak on such matters.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
For the record, if you and yours come for my freedom, I'll "slaughter" you all with a clean conscience.


For the record, "me & mine" have fought, & will fight, for the right of you & yours to do precisely fucking that. No one here mentioned "slaughter", but yes, I'd fight with you & be slaughtered rather than betray my values by denying your right to choose freedom or it's surrender for your self.

I think perhaps you've intentionally misunderstood me, Lucienne...but I hold out hope that I'm wrong on that count.

Take care!

~Kimveri


_____________________________

"You get what you accept."

"It is always wise to examine the facts from all angles before one renders a summary judgement."~_Marcus_

(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 266
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 10:04:59 AM   
lally2


Posts: 2621
Joined: 4/16/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Using fast reply...

I've been thinking a lot about this topic since I first read it yesterday and haven't been able to get back to it until this morning. My mind bouncing all around.

First was brought up a thread awhile back, on feminism, that got completely out of hand and made several people look absolutely horrid. The depths sunk to to try and cop a 'win' were revolting. It created a lasting impression in my mind of two people particularly that will forever be a negative. One person, that while apparently intelligent, and per her age should be more mature, ended up appearing mentally unstable. The other, simply childish, petty, and vastly immature. But that is their legacy, not mine and not one I will allow myself to identify with.......simply because I share their gender.

Two thoughts come to mind when such vitrol is seen/heard. Insecurity and fear of something not known or not understood, breeds hatred. It doesn't matter what the unknown or misunderstood is......race, gender, political leaning, whatever......the insecure human instinct is to fight or flee. We hate to flee so we stand and fight......human nature. How we fight, is determined by many thing, but on here........we use words. All too often allowing our emotions to take control and show ourselves in our worst light, defeating our purpose. We only end up alienating one another further. Lose lose situation.

There is a male I know of, that is apparently quite happy in service to a mistress that believes strongly in female supremacy. Yet, I also know that he has, quite violently, topped submissive women. While he has labeled himself dominant/switch, what I see is a man that is so impassioned about how he views women, he cannot wrap his mind around the existence of submissive women. His inability to accept their life path as being beautiful and right for them, is expressed in violent sadism towards them. I cannot imagine the torturous things going on in his head over all of that nor how his owner would allow it, if indeed she still does, but it is to me, the perfect example of trying to destroy what we do not understand therefor fear.
Another thought, something I have been considering lately in my own life. What we focus on, we give energy and power.

I said I do not see misogyny, because it is a negative in my mind. Something I somehow, without conscious thought, chose to avoid giving any power. So, it ceases to exist in my world. I have no conscious memory of ANYone ever treating me in a way that would lead me to believe they dislike me because of my gender. None.

I realize that the activists in the world will see what I am saying as refusing to acknowledge it exists. I understand that and to them and how they think and deal with the world, it is correct. It is simply not correct for me and how I deal with the world.

I prefer activism by example. I behave in a manner that creates an energy for what I WANT to see, therefor that is what I see.
In a bigger picture, I strive to be a person that my words and more importantly, actions, are consistent and respected. To be a leader in some small way but in a way that matters. Less so by strident words and focus on the negative but instead my personal behaviour, my actions, where I focus MY energy.
It has been proven over and over throughout time, where energy is focused, whatever that energy is focused on, flourishes.

I don't want grow hate and fear.

There are many many lifestyles, differences, etc........that I know are not for me. Things I do not want in My life. Yet, for some, they are positive choices or even moreso, life paths. Just because I know without doubt they are not for me, because I do not understand all of their nuances, or how someone can live that way happily, does not give me license to deem it wrong for someone else. It doesn't make sense for me to focus MY energy on trying to demean someone else's truth.

I still struggle with all of this, especially when it comes to religioun and politics...........but I keep trying.






hi,

im a big believer in projecting positivity and proaction, but its taken me a time to have the confidence to do so. prior to reaching the reasonably confident person i am now i was really just a fairly shy, unnassuming little soul.

these days i dont notice mysogeny because i completely revile it and will not give it space in my brain. but when i was a shy person i got picked on by those pesonality types left right and freakin' center.

for me mysogeny comes in different ways, from idiots making clicking noises at you as you walk past, whistling at you, honking their horn, to the other end of being bullies who put women down at best and are violent towards them at worst.

i agree with you. attitude projects and they dont feature in our lives because they know we could tear their little world to shreds and basically they could not handle that. so, they only pick on the pickable.

that is why the Ds and Ms nursery slopes are rotten with bullies and domineering pedantics.

just my findings

_____________________________

So all I have to do in order to serve him, is to work out exactly how improbable he is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give him a fresh cup of really hot tea ... and turn him on!

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 267
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 10:25:47 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

Objectivism is profoundly foolish and it seemed unfair to saddle the lifestyle with more tendentious fiction.


It has flaws, some of which stem from the classic response of opposing something, rather than advancing something else that is held as good, no comparative. Rand had experiences she chose to define her stance in opposition to, as Lange chose to define his books in opposition to certain observations. Fortunately, there are adherents to either philosophy that see this and seek to pursue and define what they have found desireable, rather than continue building on a negative.

And, of course, there are elements to either that will be unappealing in themselves, at least to some.

If you would care to outline some concrete objections to either philosophy (ideally in the politics section, or the Gorean section, depending on whether you have preferences about the participation; it would be off topic for this thread), then I would certainly like to hear it. If the objections are a matter of preference, that's different, of course; anyone can prefer as they please, and it's none of my business. Reasoned objections are a good foundation for debate, though.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 268
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 10:31:33 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Aswad it is nice to see you back.


Thanks. Nice to see you, too.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 269
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 11:02:36 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

Approaching it as a cultural difference would emphasize that the differences are the result of a human construct, not innate.


Cultures differentiate as an adaptation, then drift, sometimes showing parallell development.

Would it be disagreeable to assume that both innate traits and circumstances are factors in this regard?

If not, then I still think it would be reasonable to use the term "culture," or at least "subculture."

And, yes, Tannen has emphasized innate differences. But, if memory serves, she has recently presented it in terms of culture, with attention to how innate differences give rise to cultural differences. I understand how one might assume that such a presentation would give an impression that it's all socially constructed, but I would argue that to be a false implication of the term. If you consider that a social group and a society differ only in completeness, then this should be clear.

Princeton gives various definitions of the term "culture," with the common theme of the applicable ones being the collection of attitudes, behaviors, values, norms and such that a given social group adheres to at a point in time. Clearly, attitudes, behaviors, values and norms do differ appreciably between genders, partially as a construct, partially as an innate property of gender. As such, I would say that denotatively, the correct term is "culture."

Or, when qualifying further, androculture and gynoculture†.

Health,
al-Aswad.

† Compound words of this sort are not generally a productive word class in English unless the compound is made by prefixing or appending from another language, e.g. Greek, or when a (typically trademarked) proper noun becomes a regular noun through assimilation, e.g. walkman. Besides, gynoculture is more euphonic than womanculture.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 270
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 11:16:36 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lally2


[
hi,

im a big believer in projecting positivity and proaction, but its taken me a time to have the confidence to do so. prior to reaching the reasonably confident person i am now i was really just a fairly shy, unnassuming little soul.

these days i dont notice mysogeny because i completely revile it and will not give it space in my brain. but when i was a shy person i got picked on by those pesonality types left right and freakin' center.

for me misogyny comes in different ways, from idiots making clicking noises at you as you walk past, whistling at you, honking their horn, to the other end of being bullies who put women down at best and are violent towards them at worst.

i agree with you. attitude projects and they dont feature in our lives because they know we could tear their little world to shreds and basically they could not handle that. so, they only pick on the pickable.

that is why the Ds and Ms nursery slopes are rotten with bullies and domineering pedantics.

just my findings


I think life is rotten with bullies and domineering people of all sorts. I seriously do not believe that Ds and Ms, has an edge on the market.

However, I wanted to address the part I bolded because that is the part of your post that made me sit back and say "huh?"

You see, I do remember getting those sorts of reactions yet I have always, even when I was much less self confident than I am now, I never saw any of that as hateful at all! Rude, poor manners, crass, low class, pathetic.......whatever, yes. But never as hateful.


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to lally2)
Profile   Post #: 271
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 11:31:11 AM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
You gotta love LaT...You look for the shit you will find it in places that is doesn't occur.

Was once having a few drinks with this negro chick. She was pissed cuz I sent her up to the bar and she couldn't get service and returned claiming that they wouldn't serve her because of her lack of "good hair."

I went up to the bar...I stand 6' 3", I have a splendid head of hair, the proper skin tone, as well as a sunny disposition that is apparent from miles. Had to wait for ten minutes to get a beverage.

It was a crowded bar combined with shitty service. They didn't like anyone.

The moral...If you look for misogyny you will create it. Also, never go to a bar with any of them darkies. You will die from thirst.

< Message edited by domiguy -- 12/30/2009 11:39:35 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 272
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 11:43:05 AM   
Lucienne


Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri

I've obviously been unclear. ALL I'm saying is....if you must make a general summary statement about a thing, at least do the personal work to check & confirm the sources you rely upon. IF you elect to rely on fringe sources with little or no actual study/knowledge under their belt, don't be surprised when those who HAVE done their homewrok inform you that you're mistaken.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
I don't need to became an expert on Gor to realize it's not something that works for me.


No, you don't....but you MAY want to learn enough to discern the difference between the experts & those who have little more than a passing interest. At least, if you're going to make blanket statements in public fora...


Are you going to claim this is hypothetical advice, or are you going to own up to characterizing Animus as a "fringe" source with "little or no actual study" under his belt, and whose characterization an "expert" would dispute? I'm really not trying to make this personal, about him, or anyone else, but you have repeatedly questioned the validity of my sources without explaining why the statement about the Enlightenment is inaccurate. You phrase it as if this were hypothetical, but, really, why would one require so many delicate words for "check the authority of your sources"?

My entire understanding of Gor was not based on that one sentence. I did not represent it as such. I stated that it was consistent with other things that I've read. I'm curious to know why you consider it inaccurate. It doesn't matter what Animus actually wrote, just go with my paraphrase and forget he's involved at all.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
This attitude of "tear off the blinds of ignorance and see the way to a better life!"... well, it's a bit too evangelical for my tastes.


Hehe...good point. I do get a bit dramatic, I suppose. Thanks for pointing it out. 


I'm not taking it personally. Just saying, it comes across as proselytizing.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
His statement was consistent with what I've read Goreans writing about their deal, and (from my memory) it stood uncontensted in a long thread where people were actively correcting what they considered misimpressions.


I do not recall the specific passage, but if you can give me a tad more to go on, I'll hunt it down & do my best to delve deeper. Sometimes a statement goes uncontested because there are larger issues at hand, not because it's something we all agree with.


{Taking a moment to enjoy the poor research skills demonstrated by the person (maybe/perhaps) criticizing my research.}

I recognize that it's possible that the statement went uncontested because larger issues were at hand.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
Instead of challenging his credentials to speak, could you perhaps explain why the statement is incorrect? (Keeping in mind that I'm working from memory here and what is important is the statement about the Enlightenment, not who wrote it).


First, I did not challenge Animus' credentials to speak. I questioned your citing him as a pivotal source for Gorean information. As I said above, if you can help me narrow the search a bit, I'll gladly address your question. I think it'd be interesting! :-D


If I had it to do all over again, I wouldn't mention him by name. Doing so was just my way of giving credit to someone whose words offered me insight. I'm not sure if you're saying you doubt that he wrote something like that. (He did. Have you actually tried to search for it? I don't generally have a problem offering links, but I'm making an effort here to draw your attention  to the words themselves and away from him as the source of the words. And your repeated hints that  somehow the reference is too vague are making me giggle. There's a search function. Type in "enlightenment." Look for posts by him. It took me about 30 seconds to locate it.)

I wouldn't say that I cited him as a pivotal source of information. My opinion of Gor didn't change, it just became more precise. And really, what is the rational basis for questioning my citation of him if you have no objection to the content of what he wrote? I don't believe I  recommended him as a go-to source for all things Gorean. And I certainly didn't use his name as an argument from authority (again, it was just a hat tip, well-intentioned if not well-executed). So I guess I don't understand why you're making general points and warnings about ignorance and unreliability when my point was relatively narrow and you've raised zero substantive objection to the content of it -- the world of Gor assumes the Enlightenment didn't happen. I wonder if you even have a clear idea of what the Enlightenment was, or if you're just being defensive because it sounds like the sort of thing it's bad to wish away.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
Or is ad hominem argument a founding principle of Gor?


Ok, I understand that tone & inflection are absent, but I'm having real trouble seeing where you got the impression that I am making personal insults against anyone here. I do not view sharing the fact that Animus has not, to my knowledge, ever declared himself "a Gorean" as in ANY way an insult. It's not an admission of inferiority to NOT be Gorean, ffs! Perhaps a re-reading might be in order before making accusations?


Or... a refresher course in fallacies before posting a response? Ad hominem argument isn't merely (or necessarily) a personal insult. Saying that someone is not a Gorean is not an insult. Saying that someone cannot be relied on to give an accurate description of Gor because they are not a Gorean is an ad hominem argument. Broadly speaking, the truth of the words do not depend on the identity of the speaker. I was aware that he doesn't identify as Gorean. What I fail to see is the relevance of that fact. It could be a convenient explanation for how a person comes to make inaccurate statements about Gor. But it doesn't, in itself, make a person's statements inaccurate.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri
Do it....or don't....but you'll get nothing but contempt from me if you rely on others instead of coming here with the actual "blood" of your own kill to discuss.


I'll set aside my excitement caused by talk of blood and kills for a moment to point out how silly this is. You've got your one true path and you won't respect those who don't walk it?


Ohhh, no no! I didn't mean it that way at all! Let me clarify.

In an open discussion forum, when someone makes a sweeping statement on a thing I expect them to have arrived at that conclusion due to the results of their own study. When I find that the remark is based solely on the opinions of third-parties, & especially when those third parties are not even adherents to the matter at hand (i.e. Gor)....well....then I have little but contempt for their statement. It's not the person I regard thusly, it's the stance they've taken in the discussion.


Well, that's just lovely. Personally, I usually like to evaluate the accuracy of a statement in addition (or prior) to concerning myself with how the person arrived at that conclusion. At some point, I think accuracy matters. Your position sounds like the equivalent of stating that you can't respect a person who drives to an event in a car he didn't build himself.


quote:

I think perhaps you've intentionally misunderstood me, Lucienne...but I hold out hope that I'm wrong on that count.



I'll offer my sympathy for the first part, and call bullshit on the second. It's pretty frustrating to feel like someone is going out of their way to misunderstand you. I don't think I'm doing that to you. Hell, if I were doing that, my comments would be a lot more whimsical. Regardless, I know it sucks to put energy into a conversation and feel like your efforts are not received in good faith.

Still... I can't help but think that if you were open to being wrong on that count you might have taken a stab already at explaining why the Enlightenment statement is wrong, instead of looking for more specific citations and quotes when I asked you to focus on the words, not the speaker.

edited to fix unruly quote tags.


< Message edited by Lucienne -- 12/30/2009 11:47:48 AM >

(in reply to Kimveri)
Profile   Post #: 273
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 11:55:22 AM   
Kimveri


Posts: 783
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Vegas
Status: offline
Lucienne,

An incorrect blanket statement was made regarding misogyny & Goreans. YOU decided to defend it. In doing so you cited Animus. I continue to say that 1) the generalization is incorrect & 2) your sources are lacking.

As for the validity of the specific statement you cited, when I have the time I'll search it, formulate a post, & open a damn thread....since it's totally NOT about misogyny.....is it?

At this precise time, I'm handling some other things.

Now, infer what ya like from all that.

Toodle-loo

~K

_____________________________

"You get what you accept."

"It is always wise to examine the facts from all angles before one renders a summary judgement."~_Marcus_

(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 274
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 12:01:11 PM   
Lucienne


Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

Princeton gives various definitions of the term "culture," with the common theme of the applicable ones being the collection of attitudes, behaviors, values, norms and such that a given social group adheres to at a point in time. Clearly, attitudes, behaviors, values and norms do differ appreciably between genders, partially as a construct, partially as an innate property of gender. As such, I would say that denotatively, the correct term is "culture."



Ehh... not so clearly. Not across the board on gender lines such that interaction between genders needs to be approached like interaction between people from different countries. That men and women in general tend to be different in some ways does not necessarily mean that we've developed separate gender based cultures. That's the sort of thing you need to prove up, you can't just assert that it is clear.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 275
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 12:13:27 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
Crikey - this thread is still going on?

I wonder, is its duration because men like the sound of their own voices or because women cant hold themselves back from rattling on...........?

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 276
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 12:25:27 PM   
Lucienne


Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri

Lucienne,

An incorrect blanket statement was made regarding misogyny & Goreans. YOU decided to defend it. In doing so you cited Animus. I continue to say that 1) the generalization is incorrect & 2) your sources are lacking.


Lol. Let me help you out here, Kimveri. This is not a defense of the blanket statement that the Gorean lifestyle is inherently misogynistic:

quote:

To say that Goreans distinguish themselves in the misogyny department is not only untrue in my observation, it's almost too narrow of a point.


I guess if you've been running with the idea that I was defending the "Gorean=misogynists" statement I can see why you're frustrated. However, since casual consideration of my words does not support the assumption that I was offering a defense, I'm afraid you're going to have to fully own your frustration in this regard and credit me not with any intention of causing it.

quote:

As for the validity of the specific statement you cited, when I have the time I'll search it, formulate a post, & open a damn thread....since it's totally NOT about misogyny.....is it?


Hmmm... trying to find a way to put this constructively. If you were interested in discussing the Enlightenment issue, I think it would reveal one of the reasons people tend to assume that the Gorean lifestyle is misgoynistic. Hence, my "too narrow of a point" language.

My original post had two points. Dropping the Enlightenment subject into the mix to see if there were any takers to pursue that line of inquiry. And responding to your general whiney attitude of YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THE GOREANS!! As in, you expect that people should learn more about it, but you don't appear to have considered that more knowledge of Gor would cause people to dislike it even more. Or, considered that the ignorant hatred that irritates you so much now would probably be replaced with informed ridicule. I offered my personal example of learning about and disagreeing with Gorean stuff and asked -- is this enough to silence your plaintive mews of injustice? More diplomatically than that, of course.

(in reply to Kimveri)
Profile   Post #: 277
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 12:38:27 PM   
Kimveri


Posts: 783
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Vegas
Status: offline
Lucienne,



While prepping for an outing with the man, I ran the search, found two posts, read them both & found the one you referenced. Since I fail to see it's relevance to living a Gorean life, & therefore it's value as a new thread in itself, I'm responding here...

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex
Gor was based on very real Earth cultures; the novels simply presume that the Enlightenment never happened, that instead of egalitarianism being seen as a good, hierarchy and inequality were taken as the norm.
Full post/thread

I never questioned his statement as I concur: the author built his fictional 'world' without the benefits & complexities of the Enlightenment. I see that as little more than a literary device to keep said backdrop simple & thus not intrude on the philosophical, allegorical & satirical points he wished to emphasize.

If this is your sole reason for concluding that Goreans are 1) not worth sincere discussion ...or 2) all misogynists then I fail to see how further exchanges will be beneficial. I personally don't see the connection.

Also, just to clarify what appears to be one more misunderstanding I've given you:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
You've got your one true path and you won't respect those who don't walk it?


As a Gorean, I don't believe in a "one true path". In fact, quite the opposite, as illustrated here:

quote:

"There is no single humanity, no single shirt, no correct pair of shoes, no uniform, even a gray one, that will fit all men. There are a thousand humanities possible. He who denies this sees only his own horizons. He who disagrees is the denier of difference, and the murderer of better futures." ~pg31Savages


Believe it or not, I'm honestly disappointed. I'm just a country girl with nothing beyond a high school diploma & a love for books & discussions that cause me to test my convictions. I had hopes you might be someone who'd take an honest stab at that. I just don't see an alluring cost/benefit ratio here. Too much condescension & personal snips to wade through for what may be little actual meat.

Happy new year to you,

~Kimveri

_____________________________

"You get what you accept."

"It is always wise to examine the facts from all angles before one renders a summary judgement."~_Marcus_

(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 278
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 12:47:07 PM   
Kimveri


Posts: 783
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
I offered my personal example of learning about and disagreeing with Gorean stuff and asked -- is this enough to silence your plaintive mews of injustice? More diplomatically than that, of course.


Ahh, so my instinct was right -- there really was NO honest interest in a discussion, just more nasty little indirect sniping at a favorite target.

I'm just not clear on why it's something you seem proud of...wrapping condescension in 'diplomacy' just to see someone take the bait seems a rather childish thing to take joy in, don't ya think....something almost....unreasonably hateful...

Ron was right, it's everywhere.

~K

_____________________________

"You get what you accept."

"It is always wise to examine the facts from all angles before one renders a summary judgement."~_Marcus_

(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 279
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 12/30/2009 1:22:55 PM   
Lucienne


Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri
If this is your sole reason for concluding that Goreans are 1) not worth sincere discussion ...or 2) all misogynists then I fail to see how further exchanges will be beneficial. I personally don't see the connection.


At no point have I stated that I think Goreans are all misogynists. I specifically disagreed with that statement. I think if you've gone to the trouble of inventing that position for me, the courteous thing to do would be for you to also invent the connection. Instead of persisting in mistakenly attributing it to me and then acting like my failure to back up an argument I didn't make is somehow a refusal to engage in sincere discussion.


quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
I offered my personal example of learning about and disagreeing with Gorean stuff and asked -- is this enough to silence your plaintive mews of injustice? More diplomatically than that, of course.


Ahh, so my instinct was right -- there really was NO honest interest in a discussion, just more nasty little indirect sniping at a favorite target.


No. Your instincts are no sharper than your intellect. (That's direct, not indirect.) If I wanted to insult you, I would've phrased it as whining and mewing the first time. Because I was sincerely interested in your response, I phrased it more diplomatically. I never really got much of an answer, because you're still stuck boxing a phantom. Which is why I felt comfortable giving the unvarnished summary. Both versions are completely sincere. And neither version would be a barrier to sincere discussion if that's what you really wanted and you were capable of having one that involves disagreement.

And what, pray tell, is your basis for thinking that you or Goreans are a favorite target of mine? I don't remember, were you the person on the feminist thread who asked me if I was criticizing you just because you're Gorean? Someone did. It was funny, since I had little clue at the time what a Gorean is and zero clue that that poster was Gorean. I think it was that comment that caused me to wander over to that subforum to figure out the exact nature of the bias I stood accused of.

quote:

I'm just not clear on why it's something you seem proud of...wrapping condescension in 'diplomacy' just to see someone take the bait seems a rather childish thing to take joy in, don't ya think....something almost....unreasonably hateful...
~K


It wasn't bait. It was a question. And it's generally ill-advised to share all of one's impressions as they occur. You've had numerous opportunities to change my impression that you were being whiney. I wasn't married to it. I set it aside and tried to learn more about you. I suspect that what I've discovered is not your best side.

You, apparently, lack the strength to honestly and directly address the questions. It was safer for you to assume that I was trying to "bait" you because you lack confidence in your ability to protect yourself from being gutted. I have no confidence that the preceeding two sentences are actually true, but I'm sure they are equally as grounded in the text as your (half-assed) assertion that I'm unreasonably hateful.



(in reply to Kimveri)
Profile   Post #: 280
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Misogyny and BDSM Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109