RE: on your list of requirements

RE: on your list of requirements (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Jeffff -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 6:16:21 PM)
[:D]

LadyPact -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 6:17:36 PM)
C'mere. We'll tag ya. LOL.

WyldHrt -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 6:19:16 PM)
I just bet you will! I still have the pics from last time!

LadyPact -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 6:26:58 PM)
It was one hell of a good time. I can't even hear/read the words 'orgy noises' without chuckling.

RealSub58 -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 6:30:28 PM)
On my list of requirements:I think I wrote no one bald or in need of viagra; no one potbellied, a bit taller than me . . . of course I couldn't bring a domme home to momma, I like sucking cock way tooooo much. . . . He had to be an honest old gizzer not a lying son of a biatch.. . . he had to have a momma he loved cuz my Daddy always told me if he loves and takes care of his momma, he will do the same to you...... monogamous, but I do like to play with another one or two times It was really cool that the community could vouch for him; he has 2 awesome adult kids; a cat; his own place and liked me for me. His kinks? As long as I wasn't his pet, a horse and he didn't beat me everytime I made a mistake. OH ya, he believed in discipline and NOT corporal punishment. If you think you are better than he is, give me a song and dance. Sing like Josh Groban and dance like he does. HA !! quote: ORIGINAL: osf on your list of requirements for a potential mate how do you rank your requirements, assuming it's the opposite sex for me a need to be obedient is high

heartcream -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 7:20:53 PM)
quote: Jefff: My spelling also blows. Sounds like a date!

Jeffff -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 7:22:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heartcream quote: Jefff: My spelling also blows. Sounds like a date! Come on down! I like skinny chicks..:) Jeff

heartcream -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 7:39:26 PM)
Do I look like your spelling?

Lucienne -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 8:24:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23 You know why I don't like jackasses like you Lucienne? Because you roll up to me with all this advice like you're doing me some kind of favor, like your dropping science on me, but the thing is that I feel like you're treating me like I'm stupid, while pumping your own ego at my expense. Because lord, I would have to be stupid as a fucking rock to not already know everything you just said. Unlike some people around here, I don't claim to be a professional psychic. I don't know what's going on in your head, I only know what you post. And your posts were fucking clueless in terms of understanding why people responded to you the way that they did. I'm not treated you like you're stupid. I'm treating you like you're allowing your pride to distract you from the point. Because that's what I see in your words. It's precisely because you don't present as stupid that people, myself included, try to reach out to you and connect at a more rational level. But you keep stacking more straw on your wall of bluster. Not everyone here shares your eagerness to label people as stupid. And, really, it's a sign of your pronounced sense of self-worth that you'd think you have anything at all to offer in service of my ego. . quote: Clearly a throwaway flirtation on a message board is not the same thing as an actual discussion of consent, and if (hypothetically) hopelessfool took me up on my offer, there would be far more discussion before anything happened. Thank you for pointing out these mind-bogglingly obvious things that I already know. Clearly. You're welcome! quote: It's clear you don't like me. Not quite sure what I did to make you not like me -- it appears I didn't kowtow and kiss your ass enough for your tastes -- but why don't you just ignore me instead of taking potshots at me and pretending it's helpful advice. Because you're advice only makes me think you're a useless cunt. It's not actually helpful. What should be clear, because I've stated it repeatedly, is that I find you entertaining. I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you wouldn't come across like this in real life, and that I wouldn't necessarily find you as absurd as I find you online. And could you be a bit more rational in supporting your conclusion that I don't like you? We could start with your tedious and unforgiveable defense of We are the World. There are numerous cultural markers to work from in establishing our points of difference. Your references are... oh my. Dirty Dancing. Really. I openly mocked your pride in your CJ studies (don't recall if you claimed a degree or not) and your SAT scores. I've given you plenty of evidence about why I'm not impressed with you. And, if you hung around for awhile, or had some basic sensitivity about others, you just might catch on to the fact that I don't covet, cultivate, or care for ass kissers. Thinking that I don't like you because you've failed to kiss my ass actually does put you in the ranks of the unobservant, if not the fucking stupid. Why don't I ignore you? Because I find you entertaining. Why do I offer you advice? Because despite all evidence to the contrary, I keep thinking you're not an idiot and at some point you might grasp some of what I, and others, are trying to communicate to you. In case you haven't caught on yet, I don't care how many times you call me a cunt, or how sincerely you mean it. Big words, dirty words, words in general... don't normally bother me. Certainly not when the insults are directed at me. I realize you're probably the smartest guy on the internet, but I still know myself better than you do and your assumptions about me are pretty far off-base. quote: then turn around and report to the mods. I am familiar with the dynamic you refer to. Do you have any evidence or reason to believe that I have "reported" you to the mods or is this just your fantasy? Pretty much the only time I bother a mod is if someone's personal information has been posted and needs to be deleted as soon as possible. I prefer to provide my own piss for pissing matches. It's all about the essences.

sunshinemiss -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 8:31:14 PM)
quote: It's precisely because you don't present as stupid that people, myself included, try to reach out to you and connect at a more rational level This. Yes.

thornhappy -> RE: on your list of requirements (12/31/2009 9:12:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23 It doesn't matter what the TOS is, 9 times out of 10 when people get banned its because they're new and didn't click with the old guard and the mods find it easier to just get rid of the newbie than actually address the old guard's craptastic attitudes and shitty behavior. I've been here since '06; when I see someone new getting smacked with the mod-stick, they've violated the TOS. The mod-stick's not used as much nowadays, which is kind of obvious given the level of discourse on the boards lately. Generally, you're not making a good impression, given your debating style. And earlier this year you would've been moderated for the personal attacks (calling people cunts, for instance); as you can tell, times have changed.

CaringandReal -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 9:56:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote: ORIGINAL: hopelessfool quote: ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23 quote: ORIGINAL: hopelessfool So... 40 days okay with you? ...self shut up If you can be here in Seattle 40 days from now, I would gladly take you out for a night on the town, introduce you to all the best cocktails (I'm generally recognized as an expert on this subject), and then when you're too drunk to stop me, we'll have some real fun. ;) screams date rape...If im too drunk to stop you, im too drunk to give consent... and your honor she said i could do x y z before she was drunk doesnt hold up in court to my knowledge Wow! I think you are making great strides Psychonaut23. I for one am keeping track of all the submissive women you alianate. It's quite entertaining! - LA If I were dominant, I'd be keeping close track of all the submissives who say they'd consent to something when not drunk, then get drunk, then scream date rape when the action they agreed to beforehand happened, and, tee-hee-hee, get somebody innocent thrown in jail for doing what they both agreed to do so in the first place. In other words, that sort is totally untrustworthy and dangerous as hell for anyone, dom (and subs probably too) to be around for any reason and needs to be put on any sane dominant's "untouchables" list. If they have so little congizance of the importance of keeping one's word that they'll scream "Date Rape!" in those conditions, they may very well be psycho enough to scream it if they get irked at you for any little old thing, for instance if you tell her she's not the prettiest thing you've ever fucked. People always talk extensively about how dangerous it is for submissives to date. Given how easily a sub can call the law down on someone and do the whole wounded victim act and how general society still frowns upon physical abuse and forced sex (even when it's consensually agreed to beforehand) it's equally dangerous for dominants, particularly dominant men dating submissive women, as all the cultural steoeotypes work against them.

KnightofMists -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 9:59:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf on your list of requirements for a potential mate how do you rank your requirements, assuming it's the opposite sex for me a need to be obedient is high for me... she needs to be breathing.... I just have a thing for a live body over a dead one.... after that...it's rather complicated!

osf -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 10:01:50 AM)
yes, not running to the cops is high on my list also running back here to complain what a faker i am because i wanted errr,, shall we say something unusual

osf -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 10:03:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KnightofMists quote: ORIGINAL: osf on your list of requirements for a potential mate how do you rank your requirements, assuming it's the opposite sex for me a need to be obedient is high for me... she needs to be breathing.... I just have a thing for a live body over a dead one.... after that...it's rather complicated! how about not too cold yet?

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 10:17:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CaringandReal If I were dominant, I'd be keeping close track of all the submissives who say they'd consent to something when not drunk, then get drunk, then scream date rape when the action they agreed to beforehand happened, and, tee-hee-hee, get somebody innocent thrown in jail for doing what they both agreed to do so in the first place. In other words, that sort is totally untrustworthy and dangerous as hell for anyone, dom (and subs probably too) to be around for any reason and needs to be put on any sane dominant's "untouchables" list. If they have so little congizance of the importance of keeping one's word that they'll scream "Date Rape!" in those conditions, they may very well be psycho enough to scream it if they get irked at you for any little old thing, for instance if you tell her she's not the prettiest thing you've ever fucked. People always talk extensively about how dangerous it is for submissives to date. Given how easily a sub can call the law down on someone and do the whole wounded victim act and how general society still frowns upon physical abuse and forced sex (even when it's consensually agreed to beforehand) it's equally dangerous for dominants, particularly dominant men dating submissive women, as all the cultural steoeotypes work against them. Seriously? I think Psychonaughty's comment was intended as a joke (rather in poor taste) that snowballed, into an avalanche. However, you seem to be blowing hard enough in the opposite direction to reverse that entire avalanche with as much hot air. While there are situations where anyone's participation can be used against them - I don't think that dominants are any more victimized than submissives. I have known a man who had to fight like hell to keep seeing his children because his slave wife decided to make him look like a criminal in court - yes. But, I also know how submissive/slave females I've known went to court and their emotional, mental stability was called into question and it resulted in them having only supervised visitation with their own children. It didn't matter that these were good mothers, good women. My point is that there can be as much stigmatizing of submissives, and their lifestyle choices, as a Dominant risks. I'm not even addressing what you implied regarding those who do find the fortitude to step forward and report a crime against them (which doesn't happen nearly as much as the actual crimes happen). As you proved, in your post, it is as easy to victimize the victim...and to toss out all kinds of generalized motives that can have disastrous consequences, as it is to victimize the dominant with lies. Arrgh....grrr.....aahhhhrrrgh.

mnottertail -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 10:18:16 AM)
I'm going to require them tits, winnie....pop by the house. Ron

JBGolden -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 2:50:38 PM)
So you're hot for women or trannies that dress like Winnie the Pooh then? [;)]

kc692 -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 5:59:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika Look buddy. I might not be everybody' favorite person here, but I have earned respect from most over the years. I generally get along with most here and have showed a great amount of understanding and compassion time and time again. Totally self serving statement. Who's respect? Across the board or are you mostly defended by those few subbies beneath you? I stopped here, and to be honest, have not read most of the thread......to the best of my knowledge, she has it across the board.Last time I checked, I am not a subbie( I truly hate that term btw) nor am I beneath anyone. LadyAngelika was posting in 2005 when I joined, and was one of the most respected domme posters at the time. ( I just went crazy looking for one post in a thread where she was named with 3 other dommes whose words were the most highly regarded when answering posts. After wasting an hour, alas, I cannot find it) There are people who respect you domi, there are those that do not, and those that do not cannot comprehend the thought processes of those who do. There are people that get you, and those that do not, and the same in the other direction. LadyAngelika is used to another style of posting in the Ask A Mistress forum( I know, I just took a walk down "memory lane" and it was AMAZING the difference in total tonality). I will say, she has my respect, and although I am nobody in the scheme of things, to make a sweeping assumption that the only posters that could possibly respect her would be GROSSLY inaccurate. Granted, she is accustomed to a bit more circumspectness than these boards are enjoying at the moment, but I imagine(hopefully) she will become more immune to the sometimes crass nature of these boards, especially in recent times. I for one, think she has made some thought provoking posts, and would hate to see her take another hiatus.

kc692 -> RE: on your list of requirements (1/1/2010 6:03:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23 quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika Look buddy. I might not be everybody' favorite person here, but I have earned respect from most over the years. I generally get along with most here and have showed a great amount of understanding and compassion time and time again. Good for you. You haven't earned my respect, and you haven't shown any of those qualities to me. You want me to respect you, respect me. You want me to try to understand you, try to understand me. quote: The things is, a few weeks ago when you first got here, I tried jokingly to get you to chill out. You crapped on my shoe. Now I don't take kindly to being crapped on. So here you have it, I'm having a blast poking at you with a stick. Maybe that's my slightly sadistic side. But you have earned every single one of those pokes, and then some. What the fuck ever. Listen to yourself! You have no authority over me. You have no right to punish me, to "poke me with sticks," simply because...what, I didn't immediately bow down and take your advice on some issue? What the fuck is wrong with you? Do you even begin to comprehend how disgustingly hypocritical you are? I'm not into being on the receiving end of humiliation, didn't give you permission to treat me like that, and if you think me not taking your advice is tantamount to me giving you tacit consent to treat me like shit then You Are Living In A World Of Wrong. You're just another out of control ego who thinks her way is the right way, and you're relying on the same personal responsibility negating rhetoric to justify your behavior that people like you always rely on. I haven't "earned" shit. You Are Just A Self-Righteous Cunt. End of story. quote: I wanted to save you the agony of having intelligent submissive women turn on you. I told you this weeks ago. But you insisted on being a megalomaniac with a potty mouth. Now look where this has got you. You are the joke of Collarme (I know OSF was really rooting for the title! Ha ha ha! ;-p ) No, the joke is the narcissistic bitch who thinks her opinion of me is held universally by the entire forum. quote: The thing is, this is not irreparable. But you are going to have to start using that brain between your ears (and I know from your posts that you are a smart man) and using a little more temperance and judgement. So in the spirit of the new year, I won't poke you anymore. But I suggest you put your ego aside for a moment and consider what I said. I actually do hope that you turn things around. Who knows, one day we might be message board friends. You do have great things to contribute. You know what you said? "I'm special, everyone loves me, my opinion counts more than anyone else's, and if you disagree I'm justified in punishing you." To which I respond: Go fuck yourself with a rusty chainsaw, you condescending twat. We'll be friends when you get the fuck over yourself and stop seeing my ego as a threat to your own. That's what's causing all the friction between us. It may not be held by th ENTIRE forum, but I would gander that you and osf are vying for the same position in rep on the boards.,....care to take a wild guess what the fuck that is? Here's a hint...no, lower.....no, LOWER>.........

Page: << < prev 14 15 16 [17] 18 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875