RE: Operant conditioning

RE: Operant conditioning (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:26:14 PM)
it equates to the relationship, bdsm is an activity

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:27:30 PM)
bondage and discipline sado/masochism all activities

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:32:23 PM)
Bondage is inactivity depending how good at it you are: discuss.[:D]

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:32:54 PM)
Ok, I have some bearing now. You are removing Dominance/submission from the BDSM compound acronym. Gotcha.

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:34:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Ok, I have some bearing now. You are removing Dominance/submission from the BDSM compound acronym. Gotcha. i always think in terms of the relationship first, thats the part i enjoy most

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:35:58 PM)
the relationship occupies the greatest fraction of the time, and whatever else you do some of the rest

Aileen1968 -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:36:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Ok, I have some bearing now. You are removing Dominance/submission from the BDSM compound acronym. Gotcha. i always think in terms of the relationship first, thats the part i enjoy most Dominance and submission aren't parts of a bdsm relationship???? Those two things are pretty much the foundation of my relationship.

wisdomtogive -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:37:04 PM)
My opinion of the inner child, which ,imho, is in everyone is the 'self' that operates out of complete trust. It does not react out of old conditionings, which created walls of distrust. It instead responds to feelings of safety and being at peace with the world, or in BDSM, with one's Master.. Of course my way of using the 'inner child' is esoteric and psychological in nature. The inner child trusts completely, that an adults can seldom reach. Hence why meditation is highly recommended to use in reaching the inner child.

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:37:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Ok, I have some bearing now. You are removing Dominance/submission from the BDSM compound acronym. Gotcha. i always think in terms of the relationship first, thats the part i enjoy most Dominance and submission aren't parts of a bdsm relationship???? Those two things are pretty much the foundation of my relationship. but first the relationship has to be cared for

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:38:57 PM)
the bdsm you can get every sat night at your local dungeon

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:43:55 PM)
quote: It instead responds to feelings of safety and being at peace with the world, or in BDSM, with one's Master.. forget bdsm it confuses the issue

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:43:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 You mean your id? You know, I never actually made that connection! Go you! Gives me a whole new appreciation for otherwise dry verbiage.

Aileen1968 -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:44:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 quote: ORIGINAL: osf quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Ok, I have some bearing now. You are removing Dominance/submission from the BDSM compound acronym. Gotcha. i always think in terms of the relationship first, thats the part i enjoy most Dominance and submission aren't parts of a bdsm relationship???? Those two things are pretty much the foundation of my relationship. but first the relationship has to be cared for I don't know why I respond to your threads...I can never quite seem to understand what you are saying. I doubt I'm the only one. Part of your problem might just be your communication skills.

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:45:43 PM)
i say primal, but i guess id works

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:47:30 PM)
lets see, first you have to have a solid relationship from which all else springs, such as what kink you engage in

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:48:38 PM)
the relationship is a priori

Aileen1968 -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:50:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: osf lets see, first you have to have a solid relationship from which all else springs, such as what kink you engage in Nope...mine started out as a purely kink relationship. Didn't even know his real name.

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:50:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 quote: ORIGINAL: osf lets see, first you have to have a solid relationship from which all else springs, such as what kink you engage in Nope...mine started out as a purely kink relationship. Didn't even know his real name. ok

AnimusRex -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:52:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 I don't know why I respond to your threads...I can never quite seem to understand what you are saying. I doubt I'm the only one. Part of your problem might just be your communication skills. Its not just you. The fortune cookies are in fact rather inscrutable.

osf -> RE: Operant conditioning (1/2/2010 5:54:07 PM)
it could have started out as a coincidental buss ride, but it's a relationship now

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125