RE: Wrong Theocracy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


TheHeretic -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:39:14 PM)

Look guys, flip a coin, arm wrestle, whatever it takes, but one of you has to get a different avatar. 




kittinSol -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:40:57 PM)

I haven't forgotten what you're about, RealOne: if you want to keep on making your Holocaust denial claims, I suggest you crawl back to Stormfront, or whatever gross website your spawned from in the first place.




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:45:25 PM)

The good thing about freedom of speech is that it's easy to spot the anti-Semitic arseholes when they return. Takes me back to the days when you were trying to convince us all of the great 911 conspiracy.




EbonyWood -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:46:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH
They weren't strutting, they were telling people who wanted to come to Australia only to change it to leave.
Anyone CAN assimilate, they just need a reason to, rather than expect their failure to assimilate to be coddled.

And then you finish your message with, "The people that don't fit MY way of thinking should leave!"
Were you intentionally being ironic?

Seems there isn't much difference between John Howard and Kevin Rudd sadly.

I always thought the immigrants to Australia were Christians, you’d think they’d be able to dig a little deeper and find some tolerance considering the origins of the nation.

edit: -h


You need to look at the OP more carefully. The remarks were not said by Kevin Rudd, who is currently PM, left leaning and 1000 times more tolerant than Howard. He is probably the most tolerant leader Australia has had for 100 years.The email contains quotes from EX Prime Minister Howard, at one of those god awful speaking engagements.
 
To those who have said these are the words of anyone in office, he has been out of office for over 2 years. None of this was said by anyone in office.




EPGAH -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:47:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3
quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH
They weren't strutting, they were telling people who wanted to come to Australia only to change it to leave.
Anyone CAN assimilate, they just need a reason to, rather than expect their failure to assimilate to be coddled.

And then you finish your message with, "The people that don't fit MY way of thinking should leave!"
Were you intentionally being ironic?

Seems there isn't much difference between John Howard and Kevin Rudd sadly.
I always thought the immigrants to Australia were Christians, you’d think they’d be able to dig a little deeper and find some tolerance considering the origins of the nation.

You mean because Australia started as a penal-colony, they should CONTINUE having to take the scum of the Earth?
How long is their sentence? Once they've proven themselves capable of making a nation with their own set of laws (And ironically, their own law-enforcers), can we not consider their Debt To Society "Paid In Full", and give them the same freedoms every other sovereign nation has, ESPECIALLY the one to keep out people they don't want who haven't yet declared war on them?

P.S. When YOU have a "guest" in your house, and they start telling you the RIGHT way to do things, how do YOU take that? I tend to take that as an insult, something along the lines of, "My roof, my rules"...




chiaThePet -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:47:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Look guys, flip a coin, arm wrestle, whatever it takes, but one of you has to get a different avatar. 


Ladies and Germs, The Collarme DreamGuys;

And I am telling you
I'm not going
You're the best site I'll ever know
There's no way I can ever go
No, no, there's no way
No, no, no, no way I'm living without you
I'm not living without you
I don't wanna be free
I'm staying
I'm staying
And you, and you
You're gonna love me,
oohh ooh mm mm
You're gonna love me

chia* (the pet)




EbonyWood -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:52:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH

[You mean because Australia started as a penal-colony


False.




Real0ne -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:52:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

I haven't forgotten what you're about, RealOne: if you want to keep on making your Holocaust denial claims, I suggest you crawl back to Stormfront, or whatever gross website your spawned from in the first place.


hey I didnt say anything about the holocaust k... you are the one talking about it not me.

Neither did I build that swimming pool.

The fact that it is beside the prisoners barracks I find fascinating...  

What is stormfront?

You can see it for yourself if you get a special tour you know...




Real0ne -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:53:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Look guys, flip a coin, arm wrestle, whatever it takes, but one of you has to get a different avatar. 


I dont mind sharing my avatar...




chiaThePet -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:55:34 PM)


Okay, I'm running out for groceries.

Anyone need anything?

Meat pie? Vegemite?

Pavlova? Lamingtons?

chia* (the pet)





SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:56:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood
You need to look at the OP more carefully. The remarks were not said by Kevin Rudd, who is currently PM, left leaning and 1000 times more tolerant than Howard. He is probably the most tolerant leader Australia has had for 100 years.The email contains quotes from EX Prime Minister Howard, at one of those god awful speaking engagements.

To those who have said these are the words of anyone in office, he has been out of office for over 2 years. None of this was said by anyone in office.

Sorry you are correct but the op should point out the comments had been falsely attributed to Rudd at the start of the post.

This does make more sense to me now.




chiaThePet -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 12:56:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Look guys, flip a coin, arm wrestle, whatever it takes, but one of you has to get a different avatar. 


I dont mind sharing my avatar...



The afternoon martini crowd is sooooo room spinning right now.

chia* (the pet)




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 1:04:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH
You mean because Australia started as a penal-colony, they should CONTINUE having to take the scum of the Earth?
How long is their sentence? Once they've proven themselves capable of making a nation with their own set of laws (And ironically, their own law-enforcers), can we not consider their Debt To Society "Paid In Full", and give them the same freedoms every other sovereign nation has, ESPECIALLY the one to keep out people they don't want who haven't yet declared war on them?

P.S. When YOU have a "guest" in your house, and they start telling you the RIGHT way to do things, how do YOU take that? I tend to take that as an insult, something along the lines of, "My roof, my rules"...

This post is mainly nonsense but my point is Christian Australians throughout their history tried to convert by force the indigenous people that were there before them. They should have learned from this mistake and realise that people are entitled to keep their own identity regardless of what the majority is.




Real0ne -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 1:06:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
I usually ignore this stuff. Not today. My group reply:

America was founded by a group of very different people whose early leaders were all too familiar with the tyrannical role religion played in government. Even though these leaders argued and argued fiercely about many, many issues, they were clear on this point--the new nation would have a government separate from religion, ruling

Not really....  the original government was formed at church meetings called assemblies.

a country where its citizens were free to practice whatever religion they choose. This was the Age of Enlightenment, and the law of reason would guide the new state.

Well it was after the great charter which was evolved to its next stage imo.


19th and 20th century evangelicals felt differently. In the early 20th century, they even succeeded in adding "In God We Trust" to the nation's currency, a move religious president Theodore Roosevelt strongly opposed as sacrilege.

Thats because while the government as set up not to "favor" any particular religion law is non the less based in religion.


Today, people insist, against all evidence, that America's founders designed a Christian nation, despite their rigorous omission of the mention of Christ from any government documents.

the founders referred to God all the time in their journals, what God you feel they were talking about?


Some people today, ignoring both historical tyranny and modern day examples, wish to create a theocracy in the U.S. It is a horrible mistake, and goes against everything this nation was founded upon. It is also an aberration against religion.

Since virtually all law was founded in religion and common law which was heavily influenced by ecclesiastical law was used to create the constitution how do you come to that conclusion?


In 19th century America, the new railroads needed workers. They also need towns and people to populate them along the new rail routes. Since the U.S. didn't have sufficient population, in numbers or willing participants, they invited immigrants. Literally--ran massive ad campaigns to sell Europeans on coming to America. There were literally more Irish in New York City than in Dublin. Town after town of German immigrants spread across the midwest. And in darker times, America became a refuge for the scientists and artists and social leaders facing death in their own countries--immigrants who helped change a backwater country into the center for the arts and science it is today.

american welcomed talent.


Every business of even moderate size today does business overseas. These are our markets. We are citizens of the world.

Do speak for yourself-----citizen


It makes sense to talk calmly and reasonably to other nations, even as we keep the ability to use stronger methods when necessary. Arrogant cowboys strutting about telling the rest of the world to go to hell, we're Americans, is neither patriotic, effective, nor reasonable. It only proves to the rest of the world that we cannot be reasoned with, that the only thing we listen to are nuclear weapons, and they'd better hurry to get some.

agreed


Mindless blather circulating the Internet has replaced thinking. If America faces any particular difficulty, it's that.

The internet may serve to save america.


Legal immigrants of varied backgrounds are no threat whatsoever. Who cares if we have multilingual people? Anyone who thinks they deliberately sit around refusing to learn English is an idiot--this would only make their life harder. I have seen many of these people, struggling to finish a college degree in a language they are still learning while working crappy full time jobs and living with their families and a few others in just a few rooms. And they do it. They fricking successfully do it! America needs more people like that, people with courage and determination, people with the will to make their lives and their world better than it is. More people with real spirit, and less mouths bitching on the Internet.

The message also ignores the reality of the millions of Muslims who live in the U.S.--doctors and scientists and professors and every other profession, just like everyone else. They don't practice Sharia law here. They don't try to, and they don't want to. They see themselves as Americans, and they follow the law of the land.

Theocratic, jingoistic Christians in America should follow their example or get out. Australia seems a possibility.

This crap angers me. Stop it. Use your brains and think, for Christ's sake.


And it does. Nothing politically correct about it--just mindless blather that people are listening to and starting to believe.




How does all that come together with regard to theocracy?




kittinSol -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 1:06:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH

I tend to take that as an insult, something along the lines of, "My roof, my rules"...



You have a roof [:-] ?




Real0ne -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 1:08:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH
You mean because Australia started as a penal-colony, they should CONTINUE having to take the scum of the Earth?
How long is their sentence? Once they've proven themselves capable of making a nation with their own set of laws (And ironically, their own law-enforcers), can we not consider their Debt To Society "Paid In Full", and give them the same freedoms every other sovereign nation has, ESPECIALLY the one to keep out people they don't want who haven't yet declared war on them?

P.S. When YOU have a "guest" in your house, and they start telling you the RIGHT way to do things, how do YOU take that? I tend to take that as an insult, something along the lines of, "My roof, my rules"...

This post is mainly nonsense but my point is Christian Australians throughout their history tried to convert by force the indigenous people that were there before them. They should have learned from this mistake and realise that people are entitled to keep their own identity regardless of what the majority is.



how about the American indian v the American corporation?




Real0ne -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 1:13:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

The good thing about freedom of speech is that it's easy to spot the anti-Semitic arseholes when they return. Takes me back to the days when you were trying to convince us all of the great 911 conspiracy.


well when it comes to antisemitic I surely hope you are not referring to me?  I have spoke aout several times against the evils being perpetrated agains them.

911?  That was a different time.  I make quick work (and fools) out of anyone wants to argue 911 now days.... LOL






SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 1:14:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
how about the American indian v the American corporation?

Equally bad if not worse.




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 1:19:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
well when it comes to antisemitic I surely hope you are not referring to me?  I have spoke aout several times against the evils being perpetrated agains them.
911?  That was a different time.  I make quick work (and fools) out of anyone wants to argue 911 now days.... LOL

Well no how could I be talking about you I mean you didn't just make a sick joke about the holocaust victims did you?

and your comments regarding 911 does it mean you no longer consider it a gigantic Jew lead conspiracy?




philosophy -> RE: Wrong Theocracy (1/3/2010 1:25:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH

When YOU have a "guest" in your house, and they start telling you the RIGHT way to do things, how do YOU take that? I tend to take that as an insult, something along the lines of, "My roof, my rules"...




....ah, so you support the rights of the original indigenous Australians against the Christians then? After all those Christians were Johnny come latelys........




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875