Proprietrix
Posts: 756
Joined: 7/15/2005 From: Ohio/West Virginia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Croctden . I don't know of any studies that have looked at this issue. I wanted to speak to the statistical side of this discussion. Actually, MANY people have tried to do studies on this very phenom (as well as other aspects of the lifestyle). The problem lies in the quantification of the BDSM "community" as a variable. Most subcultures' members adhere to codified (or at least memorized) sets of rules that apply across the board within the subculture. They share a common lingo or jargon. They share similar sets of morals and beliefs about themselves and how they relate to the society they are within. This huge "we" that makes up the lifestyle, has very, very few characteristics that can define them as a subculture. So social scientists are forced back to square one in forming their hypothesis. submissives... nope, that term won't work because the "community" you are studying does not agree on a definition for "submissive". People who enjoy pain... nope, this includes sexual masochists who do not identify as part of the community, and SIs who are not part of the community. People who enjoy letting others control them.... nope, again, this includes people outside the study group and excludes some within. They end up narrowing the hypothesis to a rediculously intense focus "women, between the ages of 19 - 38, who derive fulfillment from consensually allowing their husbands to control the household finances and dinner menu, and also derive sexual gratification from being spanked with wooden spoons on Friday nights by said husband; have experienced physical abuse in their childhood." Even if held significant, there are numerous variables unaccounted for and wouldn't necessarily form a conclusive correlation. Thus far, it has been nothing less than pulling teeth for social scientists to come up with any credible studies on participants in the lifestyle because those within the lifestyle cannot agree on definitions. One would be hard pressed to find a literary journal that will accept scientific articles on BDSM. It's not for lack of social scientists wanting to study. It's for lack of being able to quantify subjects up to APA and ASA standards, and being able to provide the quantitative details they require. So long as the BDSM community lacks at least one common thread across the board, very little can be done via research on the participants therein, and studies will continue to be slanted and skewed. On the brighter side, the more of these narrowly focused articles that do manage to get published, the more evidence other social scientists will have to fall back on, and they can slowly widen the scope. (Please note, this is not a "call" for us all to find a common bond. It's simply a reason why there is a lack of sociological studies about us.)
_____________________________
IMO, IMHO, YMMV, AFAIK, to me, I see it as, from my perspective, it's been my experience, I only speak for myself, (and all other disclaimers here).
|