lusciouslips19 -> RE: Forced Masculinity, Take 2 (1/21/2010 7:41:22 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote:
ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 quote:
ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote:
ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 Well yes, Psychoboy has a knack for derailing a thread and making it all revolve around him. It takes an entire group to derail a thread. You're right that people tend to move in reaction to his motion. Unlike LA perhaps, I think the OP has been dealt with at great length. How can you plan on masculinization unless you know what "masculine" is? Or "being a gentleman?" The back-and-forth about those concepts, whether they change over time, where they came from -- that all seems on topic to me. Totally for real, LA, if you want advice on how to pull a reverse-the-sexes Pygmalion routine, you might be well served by talking to conservative vanilla women. They're the ones who turn the fratboys into churchgoing adults. Well its a facinating concept. Im not into sissy's, so the de-feminization is appealing to me. I suppose it can be done, but I don't think you can turn a submissive into a dominant. Not that a Domme wants to. But myself as a female submissive into masculine dominants, I correlate alpha male maculinity with dominance. Im not saying this is true for everyone. But it is my concept. The whole point of this 20 page debate is that if I work with a submissive man to make him more masculine and more of a gentleman (my vision of it, anyways), that doesn't mean I am making him more dominant. - LA You're not a Gorean, are you?[:D]
|
|
|
|