lusciouslips19
Posts: 9792
Joined: 9/8/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika quote:
ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 quote:
ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote:
ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 Well yes, Psychoboy has a knack for derailing a thread and making it all revolve around him. It takes an entire group to derail a thread. You're right that people tend to move in reaction to his motion. Unlike LA perhaps, I think the OP has been dealt with at great length. How can you plan on masculinization unless you know what "masculine" is? Or "being a gentleman?" The back-and-forth about those concepts, whether they change over time, where they came from -- that all seems on topic to me. Totally for real, LA, if you want advice on how to pull a reverse-the-sexes Pygmalion routine, you might be well served by talking to conservative vanilla women. They're the ones who turn the fratboys into churchgoing adults. Well its a facinating concept. Im not into sissy's, so the de-feminization is appealing to me. I suppose it can be done, but I don't think you can turn a submissive into a dominant. Not that a Domme wants to. But myself as a female submissive into masculine dominants, I correlate alpha male maculinity with dominance. Im not saying this is true for everyone. But it is my concept. The whole point of this 20 page debate is that if I work with a submissive man to make him more masculine and more of a gentleman (my vision of it, anyways), that doesn't mean I am making him more dominant. - LA You're not a Gorean, are you?
_____________________________
Original Pimpette, Keeper of Original Home Flag and Fire of Mr. Lance Hughes Charter member of Lance's Fag Hags, Member of the Subbie Mafia Princess of typos and it's my prerogative
|