pompeii -> RE: how many have met other people from this site (1/16/2010 7:19:30 AM)
|
I think your mileage may vary depending on supply and demand. SEX: While females must make up approximately half the human population, for some reason, a female would be in much higher demand here than a male. Likewise, males disproportionately hunt for females online so the supply of males is overwhelmingly huge. PROCLIVITY: I'm not sure what I'd expect as a normal ratio of dominant to submissive but I'd wager the Dom/Domme's outweigh the subs by some ratio, perhaps 3:1 (I'm guessing); so again, it's supply and demand. A male Dom would have, I'd calculate, something like 1/100th the chance of meeting someone here that a female sub would have. LOCATION: Additionally, your location will vastly affect the the supply of people to meet, face to face. I'm not sure what the geo-hotspots are for our kinky predilections, but bear in mind if you're not in one of them, you'll find it much harder than someone else who is in a kink-friendly arena. ATTRACTION: Physical & mental attraction will likewise affect the supply:demand curve, after the first three determinants are met. A comely submissive waif and a handsome dominant stud each would have greater chances of physically meeting someone than the average curlers-in-her-hair housewife (even so, she'll be inundated with responses worldwide) and the lowly average working joe (who has the hardest time of all). It matters less if the submissive female is mentally astute (as she'll be in demand nonetheless based on prior criteria); but it matters greatly for the average-looking joe that his mental abilities are well over par in order to even the odds against him. Putting that together, and just now glancing at your profile, summarizing: Sex: You're a guy (subtract two points ... so you start at -2) Proclivity: You're a Dom (subtract only 1 point ... so you are at -3) Location: Hmmm... Ohio? Kettering? (I'm gonna hafta' drop you another two points ... -5) Attraction: Wow. Don't get me wrong, but, physically you got most of us beat. And quite a smile. Physically I bring you up 3 points (-2); mentally ... lem'me read a profile for a sec ... oh oh ... hmmm ... not horrid but not really what I'd call literary material ... I'll leave it at nil ... Total score: -2 (your chances still aren't all that good). Feel free to argue ... the heuristics are all out of the air ... nothing here is scientific except the law of supply and demand and the basic criteria (which could be argued otherwise). Good luck! Pompeii
|
|
|
|