RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse?

RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

sexyred1 -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 9:39:17 AM)
We already expect you to have grammatical and spelling errors, so no need to comment on anything other than your bad content.

SassySarijane -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 9:39:59 AM)
Because it's more entertaining to comment on your attitude at the moment. Turn nice and then we'll jump you on the typos.

AquaticSub -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 11:15:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine I also want to know why all you typists haven't commented on my typos. Cause this isn't a grammar snark group? If that's your kink there is one on LJ. There was when I bothered with LJ anyway.

belladevine -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 12:48:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine I also want to know why all you typists haven't commented on my typos. Cause this isn't a grammar snark group? If that's your kink there is one on LJ. There was when I bothered with LJ anyway. Oops, my fault, I didn't know this was a snark group. I thought this was a discussion about abuse. I think it is very interesting how many sub-humans think it is fun to be abusive. I thought you were supposed to be compassionate, understanding, thoughtful, and welcoming to new commers. So tell me ladies, where is the "love" or have you forgotten about "love" because you are getting chemically charged? Why don't you just admitt that you are forum junkies and love abuse.

mnottertail -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 12:49:18 PM)
LOL!!!!!!! GASH FIGHT!!!!!!!!! Ron

AquaticSub -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 1:13:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine I also want to know why all you typists haven't commented on my typos. Cause this isn't a grammar snark group? If that's your kink there is one on LJ. There was when I bothered with LJ anyway. Oops, my fault, I didn't know this was a snark group. I thought this was a discussion about abuse. I think it is very interesting how many sub-humans think it is fun to be abusive. I thought you were supposed to be compassionate, understanding, thoughtful, and welcoming to new commers. So tell me ladies, where is the "love" or have you forgotten about "love" because you are getting chemically charged? Why don't you just admitt that you are forum junkies and love abuse. I didn't say it was a snark group. I said it was not a snark group. You are the one who is flinging around terms that you have agreed are abusive.

xxblushesxx -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 1:16:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine I also want to know why all you typists haven't commented on my typos. Cause this isn't a grammar snark group? If that's your kink there is one on LJ. There was when I bothered with LJ anyway. Oops, my fault, I didn't know this was a snark group. I thought this was a discussion about abuse. I think it is very interesting how many sub-humans think it is fun to be abusive. I thought you were supposed to be compassionate, understanding, thoughtful, and welcoming to new commers. So tell me ladies, where is the "love" or have you forgotten about "love" because you are getting chemically charged? Why don't you just admitt that you are forum junkies and love abuse. Sub humans? Really? btw...that is NOT how you spell divine. (in case you wanted to know...)

Jeffff -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 1:19:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail LOL!!!!!!! GASH FIGHT!!!!!!!!! Ron How the fuck did i miss this thread? :) Jeffwey

Phoenixpower -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 1:20:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail LOL!!!!!!! GASH FIGHT!!!!!!!!! Ron How the fuck did i miss this thread? :) Jeffwey lack of attention [8\|]

Jeffff -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 1:32:01 PM)
Well, in all fairness, I have been rather busy subjugating females and all. Jeff

domiguy -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 1:48:12 PM)
Fixing some sub human soup as I type. You have to start with a good slave stock.

belladevine -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 1:55:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy Fixing some sub human soup as I type. You have to start with a good slave stock. May I share in your prayer? I really do love it!

domiguy -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 2:04:17 PM)
No you are not allowed to darken my doorway. You are just as lame as the majority of the sub human's that frequent this fucker. Have you checked out the rantings of pops, luckydawg or sanity?...I think you all have been dicked over by the same dude. I did get a kick out of this little number... quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine (inresponse to lafayetteLady The only thing that needs to be fanned away is your argumenative bad breath. You might want to search for a dominant man to air out that stinking unused hole and stop wasting your precious time fighting with me. Once again, I am not here to fight with you. I am just pointing out the facts. (in reply to LafayetteLady) You. my dear, are a disaster. Probably would still throw ya a bone.

sexyred1 -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 2:59:47 PM)
God, its about time you showed up for this bitch thread. bella has been drinking all day, literally and she went from nutjob psycho to now, crying about how we subbies are not compassionate towards her and other newcomers. [sm=blasted.gif]

domiguy -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 3:03:45 PM)
You fuckers are not exactly the "Welcome Wagon." And she is right about Lafayettealdy needing some Scope and some dick. no biggie. I like the op. She makes me feel funny.

Elisabella -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 3:06:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine I also want to know why all you typists haven't commented on my typos. The only other time I've seen the word 'typist' on these forums is in osf's posts. Honey, if you're not osf, you're like, his dream woman. Now go feed the goose or something.

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 3:09:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote: ORIGINAL: belladevine I also want to know why all you typists haven't commented on my typos. The only other time I've seen the word 'typist' on these forums is in osf's posts. Honey, if you're not osf, you're like, his dream woman. Now go feed the goose or something. I was going to post that I had a sneaky suspicion that osf had traded in his velcro tennis for black pumps, but you sorta kinda beat me to it.

sexyred1 -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 3:16:13 PM)
Yep, they are a match made in Collarme Heaven. [sm=dance.gif]

LafayetteLady -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 3:30:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: domiguy You fuckers are not exactly the "Welcome Wagon." And she is right about Lafayettealdy needing some Scope and some dick. no biggie. I like the op. She makes me feel funny. Hey dipshit, she isn't the OP. And you just wish you had a dick that you could give me. Sad though that you don't have one. I truly feel sorry for you.

RedMagic1 -> RE: Do vanillas accept more abuse? (1/18/2010 3:33:32 PM)
This thread keeps getting better! .... or worse.... For what (little) it's worth, I like your posts, LafayetteLady. Of course, I like domiguy's posts too, so I clearly have poor taste. I must say, it makes for a very interesting change around here, that the low-road threads are in General BDSM, and the high-road threads are in Ask A Mistress. Kinda nice.

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 [7] 8 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.492188E-02