lucylucy -> RE: shouldn't it be this way? (1/16/2010 9:23:38 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: quasimdm is it wrong to expect servitude if you're the sole provider? if you take care of the basic needs of your subject, housing, food, clothing, electricity, etc, is it wrong to expect things in return? isn't that what some of this is all about? The "if" in your question really bothers me. It makes me think you are saying that BECAUSE you are the sole provider, you deserve servitude. Yes, I think it's wrong to expect servitude only because you are the sole provider. Now, if your question were, "Is it wrong to expect servitude from someone who has agreed to give it?" I would say, no, not wrong at all. But that's not your question. Also, I assume when you say you "take care of basic needs" like housing, clothing, etc., you mean you pay for them. But who cleans the house, buys the clothes, etc? Isn't that "taking care of," too? It seems to me you are putting value only on the money you earn. I have a very demanding and successful career, as does my boyfriend. Neither one of us is a "sole provider," yet I provide servitude because I want to and I agreed to. Is it fair for my boyfriend to expect servitude from me? Absolutely, because I agreed to provide it. I think that is the ONLY legitimate reason to expect servitude. As for the gratitude bit, there are many ways of showing gratitude. My boyfriend seldom says "thank you" for the things I do for him, but he shows his gratitude for my good service through his actions. If I got hung up on a particular kind of gratitude, I'd be setting myself up for disappointment and causing needless conflict in our relationship. Granted, I'm a sub, so my perspective may be quite different from yours. Good luck.
|
|
|
|