RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room'

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room'

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room'

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 3:25:54 PM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

They have a right to work where they want. It's the politically correct thing to do..

Which PC stuff the conservatives who'd defend them doing that job have had time for in any other context when, exactly?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to servantforuse)

Post #: 81

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 3:30:00 PM

Musicmystery

Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

They have a right to work where they want.

That's not in question.

What is in question is the willingness to do the job once they're there.

(in reply to Moonhead)

Post #: 82

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 4:06:55 PM

popeye1250

Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

'religious superstition'. Some see protecting the life of an unborn child a little differently. Some don't care.

It's awfully convenient how the cannibal cult that worships the invisible sky wizard find "religious" justifications for the things they personally don't like yet eschew those same tenets when it suits their needs.

~stef

Well, that's the Democrats for ya!
Who you voting for tommorrow Stef?

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to stef)

Post #: 83

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 4:27:40 PM

servantforuse

Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline

Maybe the pro-life democrats, who out number the republicans 3 to 1 will deny Martha Coakley the peoples seat.

(in reply to popeye1250)

Post #: 84

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 4:43:10 PM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Maybe the pro-life democrats, who out number the republicans 3 to 1 will deny Martha Coakley the peoples seat.

The democrats aren't as homogenous as the Republicans, though. That's why the Healthcare bill is such a shambles: they didn't need Leiberman and the Republicans fillibustering it when they had to include all sorts of ridiculous crap to keep the lunatic right fringe of the party happy.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to servantforuse)

Post #: 85

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 4:46:56 PM

servantforuse

Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline

They didn't need the republicans at all. They were to chicken to pas it without their support.

(in reply to Moonhead)

Post #: 86

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 4:50:19 PM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

Not so much chicken as incapable. The Republicans march in lockstep. The Democrats is full of all sorts of mentally ill wankers who got into the party because they aren't Republicans, despite many of them leaning even further to the right. If they were this Marxist mass mind the right* makes them out to be, do you think they've had any trouble getting a public provider clause through?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to servantforuse)

Post #: 87

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 4:54:39 PM

maybemaybenot

Posts: 2817
Joined: 9/22/2005
Status: offline

"The Republicans march in lockstep"

This cracks me up... how ironic as the Democratic machine both here and in DC are trying to figure out how to prevent Brown from voting on the HC bill if he is elected. And that moron from CNBC < Ed Schultz > saying if he lived here he would do anything he could to stuff the ballot box. Please !!

I tell you what, if I lived in Massachusetts I'd try to vote 10 times," said Schultz on his Friday radio show. "I don't know if they'd let me or not, but I'd try to. Yeah, that's right. I'd cheat to keep these bastards out. I would. 'Cause that's exactly what they are- Ed Schultz

< Message edited by maybemaybenot -- 1/18/2010 4:58:12 PM >

_____________________________

Tolerance of evil is suicide.- NYC Firefighter

When tolerance is not reciprocated, tolerance becomes surrender.

(in reply to Moonhead)

Post #: 88

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 4:57:43 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

if they are trying to figure it out..... they aint all marching lockstep...if they were they would have had it figured out soon after Kennedy passed on, not at the last minute.
fighting and other bollocks doesnt show perfect marching in lockstep

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to maybemaybenot)

Post #: 89

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:00:33 PM

maybemaybenot

Posts: 2817
Joined: 9/22/2005
Status: offline

They are exploring multiple options.... together they will try and block his seating if he wins. That's lockstep.

_____________________________

Tolerance of evil is suicide.- NYC Firefighter

When tolerance is not reciprocated, tolerance becomes surrender.

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 90

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:18:16 PM

FatDomDaddy

Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline

I really have to smile at this one....

I cannot believe that some of the people here who defended smoking bans in bars and night clubs because of the health concerns over non smoking employees and HOWLED when the argument, "maybe they should work elsewhere" is ever made are walking lock step with Coakley on this. Amazing! It really is.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy
I wonder if she thinks non-smokers shouldn't work in bars and restaurants that allow smoking too... I am guessing not.

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)

Post #: 91

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:21:26 PM

kittinSol

Posts: 16926
Status: offline

Patients should get the medical care they need.

There really should be no argument to be had.

_____________________________

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)

Post #: 92

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:21:55 PM

servantforuse

Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline

It's the same old double standard that republicans have had to deal with.

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)

Post #: 93

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:26:07 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Patients should get the medical care they need.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to servantforuse)

Post #: 94

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:26:36 PM

FatDomDaddy

Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

They didn't need the republicans at all. They were to chicken to pas it without their support.

You mean the definition of "chicken shit" now includes standing together in opposition of a "common cause/law", that does not reflect the views of votes of their constituents?

Tell me how the solidarity of the Republican Party was "chicken-shit"?

If this is such a damn noble bill.... why do you care whether they voted for it or not?

Why do you think the Democrats need cover from them?

(in reply to servantforuse)

Post #: 95

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:28:01 PM

kittinSol

Posts: 16926
Status: offline

Are you arguing that patients shouldn't get the medical care they need because they struck unlucky at the medical lottery? Really?

_____________________________

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)

Post #: 96

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:31:03 PM

FatDomDaddy

Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Patients should get the medical care they need.

There really should be no argument to be had.

And Nurses and Doctors should get Religious freedom they need...without threat of being fired, that includes allowing them their veiws on when life begins... unless you want goverment deciding that eh Sunkittin? Do you want goverment defining the moment of life???

(in reply to kittinSol)

Post #: 97

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:32:51 PM

FatDomDaddy

Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Are you arguing that patients shouldn't get the medical care they need because they struck unlucky at the medical lottery? Really?

Not sure which post this was referring too

(in reply to kittinSol)

Post #: 98

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:35:23 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Of course they are entitled to their views
bloody hell where has that been denied
what is wrong is when they bring these "beliefs" as a reason to deny someone else care.
to exercise that belief, should not interfere with someone elses health.

You wouldnt expect a sausage factory to stop using pork because a Jew or Muslim employee wanted to stop handling pork.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)

Post #: 99

RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn'... - 1/18/2010 5:38:48 PM

kittinSol

Posts: 16926
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Patients should get the medical care they need.

There really should be no argument to be had.

And Nurses and Doctors should get Religious freedom they need...without threat of being fired, that includes allowing them their veiws on when life begins... unless you want goverment deciding that eh Sunkittin? Do you want goverment defining the moment of life???

Sure they can decide when life begins for themselves. They have no business being in the jobs they're in, however, if they make moral decisions for patients that have different beliefs from theirs. They're not in the job to impose their views and beliefs on everyone else: they're in the job to provide legal medical services to patients. If they don't like it, they should change professions. It's very simple, really.

_____________________________

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)

Post #: 100

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Martha Coakley: Devout Catholics 'Probably shouldn't work in the emergency room'

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.094