"We've never met, but could you help me cheat?"

"We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive

Message

slavekal -> "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 4:45:45 PM)
I was recently contacted by a man who wanted to serve my Mistress. When I asked if he were single, he truthfully told me that he was living with a vanilla gf. I told him that Ms. Mlicious would only see him if his gf were aware and approved. The man then asked if Ms. Mlicious could recommend him to another Mistress. In the first place, why would she want to help him cheat on his girlfriend? And in the second place, she doesn't even KNOW him. He could be Hannibal Lector for all she knows. I was quite surprised at that level of egocentrism. Then again, the guy is a lawyer.

DesFIP -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 4:50:50 PM)
If he's looking for a professional domme he may have assumed that such a person would not be picking clients based on their marital status but on ability to play. After all, the clerks in VS don't ask if the babydoll some guy is buying is going to be given to his wife or not.

itsmeinLV -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 5:23:43 PM)
Haha, I like the "Then again, the guy is a lawyer" bit.

Delphinus -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 5:43:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slavekal Then again, the guy is a lawyer. So he says.

DrkJourney -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 6:07:26 PM)
I get this at least once a week. And they do get pissy when I tell them that I don't know them well enough on one email to refer him to my friends what a world...lol

Lockit -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 6:11:43 PM)
Oh come on DJ... you can always refer them to me! hehe I will be super nice... [;)]

DrkJourney -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 6:16:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit Oh come on DJ... you can always refer them to me! hehe I will be super nice... [;)] snicker...well...I could send the ones that wont take no for an answer...after you remove certain body parts I'm sure they will be much more understanding....lol

Lockit -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 6:19:07 PM)
Oh body parts... my favorite! hehe

antipode -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/16/2010 11:22:59 PM)
quote: In the first place, why would she want to help him cheat on his girlfriend? Cheating on his girlfriend is something he does, actively, nobody is "helped" to cheat. I come across this misconception on a fairly regular basis - you state it yourself, your mistress would see him only if his girlfriend approved. Whether somebody cheats or not is their own decision and responsibility, the arrogance that speaks from your mistress' attitude is amazing to me - nobody put her in charge of morality, and she should respect the choices others make.

usefulidiot -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/17/2010 1:07:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: antipode quote: In the first place, why would she want to help him cheat on his girlfriend? Cheating on his girlfriend is something he does, actively, nobody is "helped" to cheat. I come across this misconception on a fairly regular basis - you state it yourself, your mistress would see him only if his girlfriend approved. Whether somebody cheats or not is their own decision and responsibility, the arrogance that speaks from your mistress' attitude is amazing to me - nobody put her in charge of morality, and she should respect the choices others make. Well, its her choice whether she wants to be an active part in his cheating. I fail to see any arrogance in that. Can you respect her choice?

agirl -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/17/2010 4:36:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slavekal I was recently contacted by a man who wanted to serve my Mistress. When I asked if he were single, he truthfully told me that he was living with a vanilla gf. I told him that Ms. Mlicious would only see him if his gf were aware and approved. The man then asked if Ms. Mlicious could recommend him to another Mistress. In the first place, why would she want to help him cheat on his girlfriend? And in the second place, she doesn't even KNOW him. He could be Hannibal Lector for all she knows. I was quite surprised at that level of egocentrism. Then again, the guy is a lawyer. Well, it would be silly to recommend someone if you know bugger-all about them, that's just common sense but I don't see why he couldn't be directed to someone that doesn't ask relationship status. I see nothing wrong in that. I don't know if your Mistress is a professional or not ........but I know that if I'm paying for a service of any kind, my reasons for wanting it, my relationship status and my personal morality is none of their business. I can understand someone not wanting attached clients because of the potential hassle factor but not out of some moral judgement. I'd find that rather presumptious, rude and intrusive. agirl

JBGolden -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/17/2010 5:44:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: antipode quote: In the first place, why would she want to help him cheat on his girlfriend? Cheating on his girlfriend is something he does, actively, nobody is "helped" to cheat. I come across this misconception on a fairly regular basis - you state it yourself, your mistress would see him only if his girlfriend approved. Whether somebody cheats or not is their own decision and responsibility, the arrogance that speaks from your mistress' attitude is amazing to me - nobody put her in charge of morality, and she should respect the choices others make. I can't really reconcile that in my mind. Yeah, nobody put her in charge of morality. But that doesn't mean she should respect all the choices others make. That's stupid. If it's not something she believes in then that's something she doesn't believe in. She doesn't have to respect it at all. And for your first part: If party a knows that party b is in a relationship already and still goes out with them and so forth then they really are essentially 'helping' party b cheat is it's party a's conscious decision to do so. Whether you want to believe that's inherently wrong it's up to other people. Personally, it's not something I'd do on either side.

DarkSteven -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/17/2010 7:39:29 AM)
What JBGolden said. Since we're talking lawyering here, I need to point out that when the shit hits the fan, if there is an alienation of affection suit, that any Domme who supplied a referral could conceivably be held liable. antipode, I like that concept about anybody saying no to be arrogant and forcing their morality on someone else. I'll keep it in mind the next time a woman refuses my advances.

Shiroka -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/17/2010 7:47:58 AM)
slavekal, i give props, to your mistress about this and to you as well. the problem with some seeking the way this "lawyer" is does have potential to lead others in to trouble that they do not want or need. be it,it may be that person decsion to cheat on their partner but its no reason for other to go along with it

LafayetteLady -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/17/2010 11:46:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven What JBGolden said. Since we're talking lawyering here, I need to point out that when the shit hits the fan, if there is an alienation of affection suit, that any Domme who supplied a referral could conceivably be held liable. antipode, I like that concept about anybody saying no to be arrogant and forcing their morality on someone else. I'll keep it in mind the next time a woman refuses my advances. For giving a referral? Not likely. If you go that route, then this site could conceivably become liable for providing a place for him to look, which on some level could be construed as a "referral." In reality "alienation of affection" lawsuits against the person not the spouse are rare and so difficult to prove, most lawyers aren't going to bother. Even when claiming adultery in a divorce, you can't simply name the other person and that's it. The majority of states are now "no fault" which means that it doesn't really matter what went wrong, it doesn't change the settlement much. Sure everyone is going to come back with how "X" "Y" and "Z" happened to them, but in reality, they really don't actually understand the legal details that led to that.

slavekal -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/17/2010 9:18:12 PM)
Ms. Mlicious is not a pro. If people want to cheat, they can do so, but she chooses not to be a party to it. That does not make her arrogant. My advice to the man was that he could break up with the gf, try to get her into this life, or see a pro domme. A person has to be either honest or willing to spend money.

peppermint -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/17/2010 10:43:25 PM)
yeah..sure....I've ALWAYS wanted to know how the other person was feeling while I worked and went to school full time. Heck, maybe she could have provided him with other things besides needing money. So I went to school and worked full time. She didn't give a shit.

FetishRose -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/18/2010 11:15:15 AM)
(snarky side comment...but....if he WAS Hannibal Lector, could you forward him to me? Thanks. That's one of my fetishes [:D]) In all honesty, I'd just shine him on. He is probably already cheating, and neither you nor your lady would want to get involved with anything. I'd just ignore it.

dorrmatt -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/19/2010 8:23:41 AM)
you ever hear about the snake that went in for some lawyer skin boots?

MmeRegineSybille -> RE: "We've never met, but could you help me cheat?" (1/19/2010 8:38:43 AM)
Only if they have very deep pockets......[;)]

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.100586E-02