|
DomKen -> RE: Jew Hitler a Rothschild? ?? huh? (1/25/2010 5:08:34 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rule
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rule
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
I'm telling you that there is no predictable rate of new lethal mutations.
There isn't? [:-] [8|]
What is the rate then? The rate of generic mutation is well known so you should be able to provide the other rate if it is possible to calculate. It isn't so you can't.
Supply me with the figures and I will calculate the rate.
Of course there is a rate. There is a rate for everything. That there is a rate is not an issue.
Of course there is no rate since there is no way to even predict which mutations are lethal. The rate of point mutations is about 2 x 10^-9 per site per year. but that doesn't tell you if the mutation occured in a gene, whether or not it was a lethal recessive etc.. Even knowing what percentage of the genome is actually genes doesn't help since you simply cannot predict which mutations will be lethal.
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
You've repeatedly claimed that close breeding doesn't result in more frequent expression of genetic disease. You've also expressed the belief that close breeding will remove lethal recessives from the gene pool.
Please supply quotes of these my statements, including post numbers if necessary.
post 106
quote:
This is where you go wrong and put the cart before the horse. Merely apply the evolution algorithm: any behavior that causes a disadvantageous reproductive effect, will be selected against by natural selection. The fact that these populations that are cursed with deleterious mutations are inbreeding, indicates conclusively that by not doing so they would be even worse off. They derive a huge reproductive benefit from inbreeding and it is quite obvious what that benefit is: the elimination of half of the deleterious alleles from their gene pool. Nevertheless that does not suffice to cleanse their gene pool, as compared to European Christian populations that do not circumcise their male offspring.
Post 108 in its entirety.
post 117
quote:
If you do agree, then please do explain why indigenous European Christian populations are so much better at removing deleterious mutations from their gene pool that the frequency of lethal inherited diseases among them is six times lower than among Jews and Muslims, despite not using the Jewish method of inbreeding in order to remove half of the deleterious alleles from their gene pool. I know why this is, but I am most interested in your answer.
post 119 in its entirety
post 140 in its entirety
post 145 in its entirety
|
|
|
|
