RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


popeye1250 -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 10:39:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

LOL.  It doesn't pay to overestimate them either [:D]

They will be blaming things on Republicans come the November polls, though. 


I watched that Olberman guy for the first time last night. It seems like he's one of those "left vs right" people. Left = good, right = bad. That never solves anything. Seems like everything's a "conspiracy" to him.
He must have been crying when Bush left.
Scott Brown ran as a "republican" but he never really mentioned the republican party much in his campaign, he did say "Independant" a lot though even in last night's acceptance speech and it was surely the Independants in Massachusetts who gave him the nod!
*You can't win elections without Independants!*
I met his wife Gail Huff one time years ago in Boston, she's a reporter for a local News station, nice family, one of his daughters is studying pre-med the other is a talented singer.
They said that "Marsha" Coakley went on *vacation* during the campaign! She just took a week off and left! lol
And that Rep. Patrick "Patches" Kennedy (D. R.I.) kept calling her "Marsha" "over and over and over again!" lol! According to the commentator people were "cringing" when young Patches kept calling her "Marsha." Poor Patches, now they are thinking of running former convicted Providence, R.I. mayor Buddy Cianci against him and the polls don't look very good for young Patches!




rulemylife -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 2:48:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AsmodaisSin

That's assuming they even have balls or dicks...It usually ends up happening that the female democraps take them.  


Democraps?

Your wit and ingenuity are a wonder to behold.




subrob1967 -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 2:53:30 PM)

Last night was a direct punch in the face for this administration, and it's policies. Well done mass.




rulemylife -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 2:55:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

LOL.  It doesn't pay to overestimate them either [:D]

They will be blaming things on Republicans come the November polls, though. 


I watched that Olberman guy for the first time last night. It seems like he's one of those "left vs right" people. Left = good, right = bad. That never solves anything. Seems like everything's a "conspiracy" to him.
He must have been crying when Bush left.
Scott Brown ran as a "republican" but he never really mentioned the republican party much in his campaign, he did say "Independant" a lot though even in last night's acceptance speech and it was surely the Independants in Massachusetts who gave him the nod!
*You can't win elections without Independants!



Yeah, I hate that whole left-right thing.

We should all become Independents like you.

As long as we agree I can stay a liberal Democrat "Independent" and you can keep being a conservative Republican "Independent".






Sanity -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 3:15:33 PM)


The mainstream doesn't run through Hugo Chavez' toilet after all! I feel vindicated by this victory. What I said before the election, what I've been saying for the past year obviously isn't too far out of line with the sentiment of the citizens of what is often referred to as the most liberal state in the union.

I wouldn't call it a punch in the face though, I'd say they got bitch-slapped. In fact, for the first time in my life I can tell you that I'm proud of the state of Massachussetts.


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

Last night was a direct punch in the face for this administration, and it's policies. Well done mass.




CruelNUnsual -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 3:59:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: opiate69

Congratulations, Massachusetts, for electing an irresponsible, homophobic, racist, reactionary, lying, ex-nude model, teabagging supporter of violence against women and politicians with whom he disagrees.


Stick with the opiates. They are obviously doing you a lot of good.

[sm=dontfeedtrolls.gif]




HandSolo -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 4:31:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Olbermann wants suing for defamation if thats what he said; whilst some of it may be fair comment or justifiable by facts, the general flavour of it should certainly be sufficient, here at least.



That's not even close to actionable in the States, when a public figure is involved.




StrangerThan -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 5:26:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: opiate69

Scott Brown: homophobe: http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/why-a-vote-for-scott-brown-is-a-vote-against-lgbtq-rights/politics/2010/01/19/7040

Scott Brown Racist: http://www.juancole.com/2010/01/scott-brown-implies-that-obama-was-born.html

Scott Brown Liar: http://www.dscc.org/brownlies/

Scott Brown Nude model: http://eagleionline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/scottbrownpicture.jpg

Scott Brown violence against women/politicians w/ whom he disagrees: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&entry_id=55551





I clicked on your links and honestly, they're not worth expending any energy even discussing them. most of the links carry that same sort of !!!!!!! screamism that conspiracy sites do.

Fortunately, a majority of voters seem to agree with that sentiment.




opiate69 -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 5:32:27 PM)

Ahh.. yes.. ignore the video and legislative evidence provided, and focus instead on the medium.. [8|]
quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

quote:

ORIGINAL: opiate69

Scott Brown: homophobe: http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/why-a-vote-for-scott-brown-is-a-vote-against-lgbtq-rights/politics/2010/01/19/7040

Scott Brown Racist: http://www.juancole.com/2010/01/scott-brown-implies-that-obama-was-born.html

Scott Brown Liar: http://www.dscc.org/brownlies/

Scott Brown Nude model: http://eagleionline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/scottbrownpicture.jpg

Scott Brown violence against women/politicians w/ whom he disagrees: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&entry_id=55551





I clicked on your links and honestly, they're not worth expending any energy even discussing them. most of the links carry that same sort of !!!!!!! screamism that conspiracy sites do.

Fortunately, a majority of voters seem to agree with that sentiment.





opiate69 -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 5:33:40 PM)

Ahh, such scathing and insightful wit..
quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual


quote:

ORIGINAL: opiate69

Congratulations, Massachusetts, for electing an irresponsible, homophobic, racist, reactionary, lying, ex-nude model, teabagging supporter of violence against women and politicians with whom he disagrees.


Stick with the opiates. They are obviously doing you a lot of good.

[sm=dontfeedtrolls.gif]





servantforuse -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 6:03:08 PM)

Brain hasn't been on here in two days. I hope he didn't have a heart attack watching election returns last night.




chiaThePet -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 6:13:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Brain hasn't been on here in two days. I hope he didn't have a heart attack watching election returns last night.


Nah, he's over in Polls and Random Simplicity.

Probably being pushed down into oblivion by the DFW Dim (spelled correctly)

who hates any submissive with a sense of self.

Ya'll.

chia* (the pet)




Lucylastic -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 6:14:05 PM)

apart from being in really fucking bad taste, he is posting





AsmodaisSin -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 7:13:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: AsmodaisSin

That's assuming they even have balls or dicks...It usually ends up happening that the female democraps take them.  


Do even you have any idea what you're talking about?


i do.  It's called a joke. 




luckydawg -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 8:14:44 PM)

asmodias, only leftists are allowed to joke or use hyperbole. and they aren't going to be in a laughinf mood for a while....




StrangerThan -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 8:32:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: opiate69

Ahh.. yes.. ignore the video and legislative evidence provided, and focus instead on the medium.. [8|]
quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

quote:

ORIGINAL: opiate69

Scott Brown: homophobe: http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/why-a-vote-for-scott-brown-is-a-vote-against-lgbtq-rights/politics/2010/01/19/7040

Scott Brown Racist: http://www.juancole.com/2010/01/scott-brown-implies-that-obama-was-born.html

Scott Brown Liar: http://www.dscc.org/brownlies/

Scott Brown Nude model: http://eagleionline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/scottbrownpicture.jpg

Scott Brown violence against women/politicians w/ whom he disagrees: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&entry_id=55551





I clicked on your links and honestly, they're not worth expending any energy even discussing them. most of the links carry that same sort of !!!!!!! screamism that conspiracy sites do.

Fortunately, a majority of voters seem to agree with that sentiment.




Well, half of it just bullshit dude. I mean seriously. He's a racist because he wonders if Obama's parent's were married? He promotes violence against women because some loudmouth in the audience yelled something about sticking a curling iron up martha's butt? As far as being a homophobe, well there are plenty of people in the US who want marriage being defined as man/woman. Whether or not you agree or disagree, the way the US is supposed to work, one side doesn't get to be the only one who bitches, complains and whines, and both sides have the right to representation.

And when it comes to the cosmo spread, my boggled mind can't seem to wrap around the schism of why doing such a thing is despicable and appropriate fodder for attacks when some of the shennanigans related to whitehouse friends and appointees in the last year are not.

There is no evidence here of anything other than the fact that he's a republican and you most likely aren't.




luckydawg -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 8:37:22 PM)

actually there is also evidence of some posters being mindless MSNBC regurgitating zombies




popeye1250 -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 8:43:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

LOL.  It doesn't pay to overestimate them either [:D]

They will be blaming things on Republicans come the November polls, though. 


I watched that Olberman guy for the first time last night. It seems like he's one of those "left vs right" people. Left = good, right = bad. That never solves anything. Seems like everything's a "conspiracy" to him.
He must have been crying when Bush left.
Scott Brown ran as a "republican" but he never really mentioned the republican party much in his campaign, he did say "Independant" a lot though even in last night's acceptance speech and it was surely the Independants in Massachusetts who gave him the nod!
*You can't win elections without Independants!



Yeah, I hate that whole left-right thing.

We should all become Independents like you.

As long as we agree I can stay a liberal Democrat "Independent" and you can keep being a conservative Republican "Independent".






Rule, I was never a republican.
I was however a democrat many years ago!




SeekingAZ -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/20/2010 9:03:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

Well, now we'll find out if the democrats really have the balls to go all in and ram it through with reconciliation. Or perhaps the House will agree to the Senate version, but that's probably not too likely. The next few days will be interesting.


Health care is the main event. If they don't do something, Democrats won't have Democrats in November.


In a logical world, governed by logical political leaders, I would completely agree.

But we don't live in that world. A significant but as-yet-indeterminable number of democrats will panic over this, and immediately go into cover-their-ass mode. They will do whatever they feel they need to do to protect their seat this November.



They aren't going to do jack. They'll pass the Senate version of the bill unchanged. Which is better (or worse) than the house version of the bill in the same way that being at ground zero of a WWII era fission weapon is much better than being at ground zero for a modern day hydrogen bomb explosion.

They'll pass "comprehensive immigration reform" with the assistance of some sun-stroked Arizona RINO congressmen and immediately give citizenship to anyone that can show an actual or forged seven year old utility bill. That's 20-40 million new reliably Democrat votes that will establish one-party rule for a decade or two. Alternately, Obama is backed by Marxists who won't hesitate to eat there own if they think they can generate a crisis they can use. Those are the only two possibilities I can see that would allow the Democrats to escape what's coming to them this next election. If you disagree please explain why Congress has been so arrogant despite every poll pointing to a mid-term election massacre for the Democrats this coming November.

quote:



For a significant but as-yet-indeterminable number of them, that will mean distancing themselves from this horrible mess of a health care bill, or at the very least taking a position from which they can claim this fall that they were doing their best to improve it - which will usually involve doing what they can to weaken an already worthless bill, simultaneously making it less likely to pass and ensuring that if it does pass it will be even more worthless than it already is.

The next few days should tell us how many rats will flee the  ship. If enough of them jump, this bill is dead. At best, even if it does pass it's now certain to be even worse than it might have been if the conference committees had had at least a fighting chance to move it a little further toward the House's version. That's over now; the best we can do now is pretty much the entire Senate bill, word for word. This is a huge step backward for civilization, any way you look at it.








AsmodaisSin -> RE: Coakley Concedes, Brown wins in Massachusetts! (1/21/2010 3:52:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

asmodias, only leftists are allowed to joke or use hyperbole. and they aren't going to be in a laughinf mood for a while....


Oh.  Well damn.  i'll be sure to try and remember that.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875