Brown seems less against heatlhcare bill? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


pahunkboy -> Brown seems less against heatlhcare bill? (1/21/2010 7:56:59 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8Y2sAdDw98

Sen-Elect Scott Brown (R) the next day after getting elected.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Brown seems less against heatlhcare bill? (1/21/2010 8:04:20 PM)

Actually, it has been his position throughout the race. When the democrats hit him with the anti-healthcare cry, he proudly pointed out that he voted FOR universal health care law for Massachusetts citizens. His postition was that MA taxpayers should not have to pay twice for something thier state was already giving them.




pahunkboy -> RE: Brown seems less against heatlhcare bill? (1/21/2010 8:07:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Actually, it has been his position throughout the race. When the democrats hit him with the anti-healthcare cry, he proudly pointed out that he voted FOR universal health care law for Massachusetts citizens. His postition was that MA taxpayers should not have to pay twice for something thier state was already giving them.


Thanks.  I don't know- as I did not pay attention to that race.




asyouwish72 -> RE: Brown seems less against heatlhcare bill? (1/21/2010 8:21:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Actually, it has been his position throughout the race. When the democrats hit him with the anti-healthcare cry, he proudly pointed out that he voted FOR universal health care law for Massachusetts citizens. His postition was that MA taxpayers should not have to pay twice for something thier state was already giving them.


This, of course, is absolute idiocy and nonsense. Since both plans rely on private insurance companies, and you only need to be insured once, nothing would change for the population of Massachusetts, and the federal plan would incur no costs for them (save the tax on 'Cadillac' plans to fund coverage subsidies for the poor). They are covered already. By broadening the pool of insured and thereby further distributing risk, it actually would have likely saved them money in the long term. Nice thinkin' folks.






PyrotheClown -> RE: Brown seems less against heatlhcare bill? (1/21/2010 8:25:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: asyouwish72

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Actually, it has been his position throughout the race. When the democrats hit him with the anti-healthcare cry, he proudly pointed out that he voted FOR universal health care law for Massachusetts citizens. His postition was that MA taxpayers should not have to pay twice for something thier state was already giving them.


This, of course, is absolute idiocy and nonsense. Since both plans rely on private insurance companies, and you only need to be insured once, nothing would change for the population of Massachusetts, and the federal plan would incur no costs for them (save the tax on 'Cadillac' plans to fund coverage subsidies for the poor). They are covered already. By broadening the pool of insured and thereby further distributing risk, it actually would have likely saved them money in the long term. Nice thinkin' folks.





Why are you encumbering his logic with facts, you know it'll only confuse them lol




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625