RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts

RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master

Message

slavejali -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 5:35:53 PM)
*quote:* Original Quote: Quivver ~ Men find nothing wrong with having multiple partners, only women seem to think that is wrong. Now why is that? ~ Your Thoughts? Ive got a few thoughts on this thinking about my dealings with men: I think its part of masculinity to want to conquer and own. Its ok to conquer lots of things but what they want to "own" has to be prized to be of value, something that hasnt had much use becomes a precious rare gem, why do you think so many men love the idea of posessing a virgin? However men also value something that is of good use, they are very mechanically minded that way. They could see something as precious to own that has done the mileage and become better from the experience., kinda like a car that has been run in, it works better. The way the make-up of men work is going to be directly reflected on how women think they can be attractive to a man. (Coming from a female slave perspective)

fyreredsub -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 5:52:06 PM)
poly is generally a kajiras middle name[;)]. i was speaking form a societal point of view not my own.

Sirprmidnight -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 5:58:45 PM)
The answer is simple. It is a primal instinct in man. If man evolved from Primates then his instincts is to care for his group, family, friends, etc. It is not something that just one day appears, we are taught that a man is tough and rough and strong and smart, etc. However, all men have it in their gene as do women. As to the fact of a man believing that a woman can be a lady if she has had several affairs. Let's face it the statement itselfs tell it all. Sluts are those who have been taken early and by so many, and so on. Think about it.

fyreredsub -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 6:08:57 PM)
perhaps in the vanilla sense of things, yes this is a schema that will no doubt stay that way. in the Gorean culture, a 'slut' belongs to her Master and may not necessarily used by anyone other than him. i have never had a Master share me with other men but i am always a beast with Master.Master brings out the slut in me. i find the word slut to be a term of endearment in my world. it means Master finds pleasure and value in me.

primeslave -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 6:22:48 PM)
i find that there is nothing wrong with multiple partners as long as i am not in a committed relationship. once in a committed relationship then i expect the same from him .... that we define the parameters of what the means to both of use and from there we dont cheat on each other. if that means that we have sex with others, fine so long as it is mutual. if we have sex with others in front of each other or choose to bring another into the relationship, fine ... so long as it is mutual. i have always been a very highly sexed woman and i have never been ashamed of that. i dont kiss and tell. i dont count how many i have been with. lets just say a few ..... i expect to hold the man to the same standards that i am held to. your word given is your bond. everything between the two is mutual and honorable. when it becomes cheating then it is wrong.

Takethiswaltz -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 7:14:27 PM)
Take heed shy girl. I don't hear the word player much anymore when it comes to promiscuous men. They are now called sluts. I even approached one of my brothers (lovingly, of course) and advised him to quit being so slutty. He knew EXACTLY what I was telling him. Course i got that Irish Catholic You're Goin to Hell look goin on when I call my brothers on their indiscretions, ha-ha....[:D]

preciousgem -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 7:57:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: Kiledar When I first started dating (vanilla realtionships) I thought as a good little catholic boy, one guy one girl. Hell I had not seen or felt a breast till I was 19 which for this day and age seems to be rare. Eventually I met My girl. At that time we were still vanilla and somethign happened. She became sexually involved with another. From the way I was raised what she did was unforgivable and I had to leave her. But there was one thing that stopped Me. I loved her and sat down and thought about it. What is sex. Is it an expression of love? Is it a recreational activity? Is it just for procreation? It all comes down to the persons upbringing and thoughts on that question. I came to the conclusion that while sex can be special between two that love eachother it can also be a stress reliever a recreational enjoyment and many other things. As long as she was practicing safe sex and still came back to Me I had no probolems with it. Even now that we have found the D/s lifestyle I sitll allow her to be used by others. I am confident that no matter how good of a time she has with another she will return where she belongs. There's nothing wrong with other partners, but if there is deceit involved, that's the breaker, for me. Level Sir Level i dont belive that i was ever deceitful with Kiledar at all ( but then again my mind is not what it use to be [:)]) if i did not tell Him pior to the act then it was the next time i saw Him. i belive that slut can be a term that One uses to show feelings towards thier girl/boy. but when the word is used to be hurtful or just plain mean then there is something wrong with it IMO. as for why is a girl called a slut if she has had or has more then one parnter while a guy is called a player. i think is how people look at life, growing up most are raised that a girl is to be the one that stays home and cooks and cleans and takes care of the household while the man went out and brought home the money. but heaven forbid that she wanted to makesome thing out of herself then a housewife.Now a days that role is not so clear any more more and more men are staying home to do house cleaning and cookign ect. ect. the one thoguththat keeps running throught my mind when i think about this thread is the old saying " boys will be boys" well what so wrong with "girls will be girls? and they have multiable parnters?"

mons -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 9:20:19 PM)
careful quivver it is a short fall mons

wytchywoman -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 9:37:26 PM)
I am trying hard to remember your first post. I think you said "This was my idea...not Master's idea" But he indulged you? He let you run with it and now you can't carry it? I really do have some sympathy...but it only goes so far! What I hear is a "slut"...and that is not bad at all to me....but to try now try to put it on someone else...speaks volumes to me.

mons -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/25/2006 9:40:13 PM)
lady oh I think everyone has seen my bad spelling and word placement so I would not even too spelll your name I did not want to mess it up i left the last part of:) Now that said: your so right as along as it is someone who owns them it is ok to be a slut. But chilly you wrote cocksmen is a form of having many women by men? I thought it was an adult moive studio! Also maybe I need to read more sexual matrials because honey is what a bee makes, I am confused. I really thought this about that word i mean no insult at all. thank you for the knowledge! mons

Vendaval -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 12:25:42 AM)
I agree with this statement. Most women are better at discretion when they have multiple partners. Most men feel the need to broadcast their conquests to anyone who will listen. Would you please elaborate on the Darwinian musings amayos? Is it simply a matter of fancy feathers and chest thumping antics? Thank you, Vendaval quote: ORIGINAL: amayos This must be slut day. [:D] I would argue emphatically against that premise. Many females in fact do not have a problem with the idea of multiple sexual opportunities. The myth saying otherwise is perpetuated quite often by the female herself, in fact. Sexual interest in variety is not exclusive to the male alone, though it sometimes may seem so as the two sexes tend to make use of different mating stratagems. The male tends simply to be more obvious, and there are a number of Darwinian musings as to why that may be.

Arpig -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 12:33:37 AM)
Basic biological instinct, it has to do with survival of the species

slaveladyj -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 3:44:41 AM)
May I say that the statement was just made to leviate some tension in a serious thread. I do know that many men can and do find one woman and stay with her, without playing around. Now, for most men, and again, I"m not saying all, before they find that one, they play the field and no one thinks badly of them for that. Where as women from my generation, were taught, as someone here has mentioned, that men won't buy the cow if they get the milk for free. We were taught as a society, that good girls didn't. I think society is changing, that isn't the same any more. I know I never taught my daughter that it was wrong to learn and explore her sexual nature. I just think it's a shame it took me so long to realize that sex is not a bad thing. (Yeah, I'm one of those catholic girls, or rather was when I believed.) I'm in my mid forties and I'm just now exploring my sexual desires with any serious intent.

OMGLizzy -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 3:53:32 AM)
Perhaps i am a true slut then. Cause i don't see anything wrong with it either. LOL

SirMichealspeach -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 4:08:18 AM)
A whore is someone who gets paid to be with multiple partners... a slut is someone who does it for the pure enjoyment.

amayos -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 10:38:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: fyreredsub Natural Order is instinctual and primal and raw....(not to mention fantastic)[;)] Preach it, sister. :)

KittenWithaTwist -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 10:43:23 AM)
quote: The statement I am bringing to you is this: ~ Men find nothing wrong with having multiple partners, only women seem to think that is wrong. Now why is that? ~ Your Thoughts? Actually, what I find most often is that it is our peers who find it obscene that a woman should have multiple sex partners. Other men (especially those not included, but also those who are-sometimes), other women (particularly our mothers, sisters, grandmothers, nosey neighbors), co-workers, friends...usually anyone who doesn't not have a somewhat informed view of polyamory believe that it is wrong for a woman to "take a walk around the block". The view of a slutty woman is traditionally coupled with the seductress or the whore, while the slutty man (which, I have been told, does not actually exist) is coupled with the virile stud, spreading his seed and being congratulated at the bar by all his buddies. It is traditionally considered that the male, as the "dominant" (that is, in literature and art, not in life) is permitted to get as many of his offspring pushed into the world, while the female, as the "submissive" (again, in literature and art, not in life), must simply lie back and take it. After all, how is a woman to be premiscuous(sp?) if she is constantly barefoot and pregnant? The term "slut" seems to have been taken back by many modern women, particularly those of a more open-minded stance, to represent the woman who desires and asks for sex and pleasures of a sexual nature. This new view does not carry the abhorrent undertone that it once did (at least, in sex-positive circles), and leaves women to be accepted as sexually provocative members of society. Sadly, in most of America, sex still seems to be good for men and baaaaaaad for women.

amayos -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 11:14:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Vendaval quote: ORIGINAL: amayos Sexual interest in variety is not exclusive to the male alone, though it sometimes may seem so as the two sexes tend to make use of different mating stratagems. The male tends simply to be more obvious, and there are a number of Darwinian musings as to why that may be. I agree with this statement. Most women are better at discretion when they have multiple partners. Most men feel the need to broadcast their conquests to anyone who will listen. Would you please elaborate on the Darwinian musings amayos? Is it simply a matter of fancy feathers and chest thumping antics? To put it in simple animal terms, the female—though arguably endowed with the same instinctual directive to reproduce—has always faced reproductive disaster if she chooses unwisely. She has developed social methods of shunning unwanted male attention and advances in favor of those males she desires. I find people often make the mistake of labeling her as virtuous or even "prudish", when in fact she's simply being selective in what she wants. Surround her in private with males she finds physically and behaviorally pleasing, and you will see her bristle with desire that matches that of the male's. Laying back and watching them compete for her access is something she wouldn't necessarily be unwilling to do.

MasterBenedict -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 11:36:11 AM)
I, personally find nothing wrong with having multiple partners, but as has been said by many (if not most) I AM a guy... I think it actually goes back to midieval times-where ladies were prized as such and never allowed off their 'leashes' so to speak.

ownedgirlie -> RE: Sluts? requesting your thoughts (3/26/2006 12:02:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slavejali However men also value something that is of good use, they are very mechanically minded that way. This statement has helped me in more ways that you might realize today. Thank you.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875