RE: Classification--- common sense?

RE: Classification--- common sense? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

LadyAngelika -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:05:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovingpet quote: ORIGINAL: LadyAngelika Ok.. since this thread is going round and round like a merry go round, and pretty pointless at this point, quote: 10 NZ Pts gotta ask, what are these? And the fluffy points? - LA Nihilus Zero points.... He hands them out for I dunno... somethin or other. I dunno. giggle I just know I don't get nearly enough of them. [>:] Ok... thanks ;-) - LA

littlewonder -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:05:52 PM)
No matter what you set your parameters to, if you're a female on this site you'll get hit on. I've put my so that no one could see me but I still posted on here...and I'd still get hit on from men reading my forum postings.

Aylee -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:12:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee Intelligent arguement? There is nothing to argue or debate about here. Except perhaps, whether I would or would not fuck DarkSteven. /Casts affirmative vote/ [:)] You are SO cute!

windchymes -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:38:03 PM)
quote: ...it's equally rude and equally a waste of my time if they're showing up in my search results as available. I wasn't going to get in this, but those "waste of my time" comments are probably more lame than someone squawking about being OWNED and TAKEN (which I feel, when done in excess, are just one step higher than a high school girl waving a yarn-wrapped class ring around under everyone's nose). COMMON SENSE includes accepting the fact that, when you're in a website like this, there are going to be all kinds, and you're going to HAVE to spend the time to find what you're looking for, and spend lots of it. It ain't gonna roll your way just because you are The Dom. If you don't have the time to spend, then stop wasting all of OUR time crying about it and move on to something less time-consuming! YOUR time isn't any more valuable than anyone else's in here, and I really resent the implication that it is.

pyroaquatic -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:38:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: hawkmoonelric Since the ratio is probably something like 1000 men to 1 available woman, this "shotgun" approach makes a sort of crude sense to some. Everyone else's problems seem like a speck of lint.....until one day YOU get that speck of lint caught in your eye, and can't get it out. To some, yes. Shotguns have terrible accuracy. I'd rather be an arrow (and yes I have a compound bow!) :D quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee No sweetie. Nasty would be: You turn that big flashing martyr sign on your head up any brighter and you're going to singe off your pointy little moron head. Stop your whinging, pull that stick out of your ass and use it in place of the spine that you obviously do not have. Frankly you are so dense you're developing an event horizon from which not even a clue could escape. You are here under the assumption that you have half a brain and opposable thumbs. Step up to the plate and fucking prove there is more to you than that and quit whining or get used to having a thin coat of barbeque sauce on your ass. Am I being clear enough for you? Wow.... just.... wow. Aylee. is this unintentional wank fodder or a quote for the Masculinalization Thread over in ask a mistress? that quote alone almost makes me want to break my asexuality vow. >_>

LadyAngelika -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:41:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pyroaquatic that quote alone almost makes me want to break my asexuality vow. >_> Was it the though of having a thin coat of barbeque sauce on your ass that did it for you hun? ;-) - LA

NihilusZero -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:43:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovingpet Nihilus Zero points.... He hands them out for I dunno... somethin or other. I dunno. giggle I just know I don't get nearly enough of them. [>:] I likes ya. So, fine. [8D] [:)] 10 points.

stella41b -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:47:54 PM)
Some people are just so anal that if you subjected them to figging they'd turn ginger root to a sponge.

antipode -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:50:51 PM)
quote: But, if you fail to correctly set your profile parameters One could say you have fallen prey to the same syndrome... You say you are a Dominant Man, and yet you whine..

Jeffff -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:52:54 PM)
Did the OP go away mad? I leave for a little while and Aylee is fucking Steven and L.A. is begging me to go down on her. Can't step away for a minuet ! Jeff

LadyAngelika -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 4:55:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff Did the OP go away mad? I leave for a little while and Aylee is fucking Steven and L.A. is begging me to go down on her. You were the one begging, remember? quote: Can't step away for a minuet ! You stepped away for a minuet and didn't inivite me! I love French social dance! - LA

Jeffff -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 5:00:21 PM)
I am quite the Bon Vivant! (fucking spell check!) Jeff

Aylee -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 5:05:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pyroaquatic quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee No sweetie. Nasty would be: You turn that big flashing martyr sign on your head up any brighter and you're going to singe off your pointy little moron head. Stop your whinging, pull that stick out of your ass and use it in place of the spine that you obviously do not have. Frankly you are so dense you're developing an event horizon from which not even a clue could escape. You are here under the assumption that you have half a brain and opposable thumbs. Step up to the plate and fucking prove there is more to you than that and quit whining or get used to having a thin coat of barbeque sauce on your ass. Am I being clear enough for you? Wow.... just.... wow. Aylee. is this unintentional wank fodder or a quote for the Masculinalization Thread over in ask a mistress? that quote alone almost makes me want to break my asexuality vow. >_> I just wanted to be clear that there is a difference between me making a comment pointing out someone making an idiotic complaint and me being nasty.

VaguelyCurious -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 5:11:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: pyroaquatic quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee No sweetie. Nasty would be: Insert blisteringly beautiful use of invective here. Wow.... just.... wow. Aylee. is this unintentional wank fodder or a quote for the Masculinalization Thread over in ask a mistress? that quote alone almost makes me want to break my asexuality vow. >_> I just wanted to be clear that there is a difference between me making a comment pointing out someone making an idiotic complaint and me being nasty. Pyro has a point, though-just because it was justified doesn't mean it can't make people go a little hazy round the edges...

Aylee -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 5:15:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious Pyro has a point, though-just because it was justified doesn't mean it can't make people go a little hazy round the edges... Do you mean angry or turned on? Because I just do not see that as sexual at all, but whatever floats someone's boat, ya know. And I want a pic of you! Everyone has been talking about how hawt you are.

lovingpet -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 5:18:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NihilusZero quote: ORIGINAL: lovingpet Nihilus Zero points.... He hands them out for I dunno... somethin or other. I dunno. giggle I just know I don't get nearly enough of them. [>:] I likes ya. So, fine. [8D] [:)] 10 points. Whoo Hoo!!!!!!! I finally get to change my number after what.... ohhhhhh 4 months? LOL likes NZ too I should totally start awarding pet points... don't know what they'd be for yet though. Hmmmmmm

VaguelyCurious -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 5:37:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious Pyro has a point, though-just because it was justified doesn't mean it can't make people go a little hazy round the edges... Do you mean angry or turned on? Because I just do not see that as sexual at all, but whatever floats someone's boat, ya know. And I want a pic of you! Everyone has been talking about how hawt you are. I meant turned on-apparently sometimes assertiveness gets people all hot and bothered-would you believe it? [image]local://upfiles/913882/3C1B9E96A0364DFC9FEA08D4BEA6A1CE.jpg[/image]

Aylee -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 5:42:29 PM)
WOOHOOO! You ARE a hottie! I had not thought of that being in the "assertiveness" category. Thank you for pointing that out. I was putting it in the "nasty" category and I just do not see that as a turn on, although I know that there are those that do get turned on by such. After all, if I am going to be speaking to someone like that on a regular basis, why would I want to spend time with them. By the way, did I mention that you are HOT!

VaguelyCurious -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 5:50:24 PM)
Why thankyou, kind lady! [:)] Plus, as well as being assertive, it was creative. Creative is good too...

pyroaquatic -> RE: Classification--- common sense? (1/30/2010 6:41:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee WOOHOOO! You ARE a hottie! I had not thought of that being in the "assertiveness" category. Thank you for pointing that out. I was putting it in the "nasty" category and I just do not see that as a turn on, although I know that there are those that do get turned on by such. After all, if I am going to be speaking to someone like that on a regular basis, why would I want to spend time with them. By the way, did I mention that you are HOT! It was not so much... the nastiness... more of how intellectually well put together it was. STEAMY! = PYROAQUA(TIC)

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125