cloudboy
Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005 Status: offline
|
>Quite the opposite on my little list of words to live by. I'm a firm believer that being in no relationship is preferable to being in a consistently bad one.< Well, Roger B. does recommend against the extremes. There's a bit of tongue and cheek built into the whole proverb to begin with... >In context not so much. But I don't believe that is what the author was saying. It was more about the lesser of two evils and which to choose. Hence his explanation of when a situation becomes so stressful that peace and quiet is all you can think about. The only comparable situation I can think of is someone who is responsible for several small children who are all ADD and are constantly yelling, screaming and getting into things they shouldn't. I have personally been tortured with moments like this, and honestly, solitary confinement with no people would have been a welcome relief. But on the whole it is unhealthy to live a life filled with combat as the only means of connecting with others. Intellectual discourse is all fine and dandy, but when all you have to get on with people is constantly disagreeing with them and being argumentative, you aren't really assuaging your loniless, you are actually exacerbating it more, because you are pushing people away.< Well, I would also say that strife covers more than combat. In order to feel or experience strife, you have to be invested in something or someone. I agree that one can chose between better and worse courses of action. Still, at one's root, better to care than be apathetic. Better to take a stand than sit idly by. Conversely, better to shut up rather than make things worse. (Not always easy to know the difference.) >To speak to the rest of your post, cloudboy, I've gotten the impression at times that you might be message-board-stalking me, on the Ask A Mistress board, because you sometimes post right after I do, and what you say is intended as a direct refutation of what I have written, instead of a response to the OP, or a furtherance of conversation. I don't know (or care) if that's really what is going on, but there are other posters who do care about such things, and if they get that vibe from you, too, I'm not surprised some of them are taking you to task for it. I'm not taking a side here, please understand. I am, however, saying that you have to expect reaction if you engage in intentionally confrontational behavior.< Every poster has to stand up for his own record and body of work. I don't shy away from challenging others. I try to be fair-minded about it. Without question, though, I've taken issue with a few of your positions. But, nothing leaps to mind at the moment. We can't see eye to eye on everything... I just find it humorous that one can "stalk" anyone on a CMMB. Its a public forum. Stalking happens when you track or follow people into private places where you do not belong and were not invited. Once you hear credible evidence that I'm standing outside someone's house or tailing them around town --- at that point -- please do pin me as a "stalker." Keep in mind that rather than admit impeachment, many opponents just play dirty (personal attacks, smears, and innuendos.) -- That's never been your tack. Anyway, thanks for the feedback.
< Message edited by cloudboy -- 1/31/2010 9:05:49 PM >
|