perverseangelic -> RE: need some thoughts on training (3/26/2006 12:51:35 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: devilwntdown right on amayos, i would have to agree to that as well. we as humans wouldnt exist if it were not for us being sexual to some point. one can be sexual with out having sex. i really dont understand how people come to the conclusion in this way of life that somewhere along the line it is not about sex. if you just want someone to clean your house or wipe your ass, quit being lazy, do it yourself or get a maid. just because someone doesnt take their clothes off, doesnt automaticaly make it not sexual. if in fact at some point it doesnt become sexual, your in it for the wrong reason, the way i see it anyway. what would be the point of someone giving themselves to me, mind, body and spirit, if i cant do as i wish with them. one who does not accept their own sexual needs, is to some point, a slave to themselves. Thing is, for some of us it really isn't about sex. I'm not one of 'em, as this is intricatly tied up with my sexual needs, but for some it -is- about no strings housecleaning and beating, on both ends. To say that someone who doesn't want to get sexual is in it for the wrong reasons is a bad idea, and invalidates many people with different sexual desires. I wasn't arguing that the girl in your case -wasn't- gonna get sexual at some point, I was simply pointing out that someone she is not sexually attracted to may make an idea BDSM partner, especially for introduction, because it reduces one of the things that causes problems. If she isn't sexually attracted to them, and makes that clear, it allows her to explore BDSM without sexual entanglement. That can be a GREAT thing for a new person.
|
|
|
|