RE: Missing lifestyle interest?

RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

artglfr -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 4:36:29 PM)
I am a Dom and love submissive females, I am a Dom and love Dominant Females this is a great big world and as long as everyone is fitting their own personal niche and getting what THEY need isn't it all good? Doms are great for their subs and Mistresses are the same for theirs...I see no reason to assume either is better or worse...each is just different...Viva la difference

amayos -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 4:47:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef Cloudboy's repetitve whining aside, TPTB took requests for interests before they made that feature available to us. Perhaps no one requested the one you feel is missing? Have you tried suggesting it's addition to the list? ~stef Good idea. Perhaps I shall...in the pursuit of equality and fairness, of course. ;)

IronBear -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 4:49:11 PM)
There are threads in various forums which celebrate or advocate Female Supremacy. Mostly they haven't been drowning out other general threads and thus I just passthem by... Female supremists have as much right to their opinions and beliefs as I as a Gorean Free Man do. What does piss me off is when some twirp starts blastinyg her suprenist beliefs in multiple and IMO deliberate attempts to disrupt CM.. I of course refer to that Jassika thing..... I find the volume of her posts have now become offensive on a personal basis to a point a couple of folk have commented to me within the last48 hours that they are considering quittingtheforums, and I cant say I blame them..

ownedgirlie -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 4:54:59 PM)
~ sidebarring just a bit ~~ i agree her posts are a bit overwhelming in their frequency now but...quit the forums over it? Why not just skip reading them? To each their own and it's their choice, i suppose. Personally i think they are exciting to herself at this point and when the excitement calms down, so will the posts. i'm sure we could start an entire (and active) thread on the subject of her and her alone. And now, back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Level -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 4:59:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie i must admit, however, a dislike for the term "supreme" in any regard, other than when i refer to my Supreme Being. But that's a different topic. [;)] What about Diana Ross? [sm=banana.gif]

amayos -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 5:01:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IronBear There are threads in various forums which celebrate or advocate Female Supremacy. Mostly they haven't been drowning out other general threads and thus I just passthem by... Female supremists have as much right to their opinions and beliefs as I as a Gorean Free Man do. What does piss me off is when some twirp starts blastinyg her suprenist beliefs in multiple and IMO deliberate attempts to disrupt CM.. I of course refer to that Jassika thing..... I find the volume of her posts have now become offensive on a personal basis to a point a couple of folk have commented to me within the last48 hours that they are considering quittingtheforums, and I cant say I blame them.. IronBear, I can't say I blame you. It's getting tiresome and quite trollish in nature. At first I thought it was amusing, but now it's starting to feel like some weird form of prodomme spam that just won't go away.

truesub4u -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 5:03:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie ~ sidebarring just a bit ~~ i agree her posts are a bit overwhelming in their frequency now but...quit the forums over it? Why not just skip reading them? To each their own and it's their choice, i suppose. Personally i think they are exciting to herself at this point and when the excitement calms down, so will the posts. i'm sure we could start an entire (and active) thread on the subject of her and her alone. And now, back to our regularly scheduled programming. Ok, I got along with Owned on this one. I've tried to keep my mouth shut on this post. So as to not start a flame war. But leaving the CM board over that?... or this?... I think there's more to it than that.

ownedgirlie -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 5:05:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie i must admit, however, a dislike for the term "supreme" in any regard, other than when i refer to my Supreme Being. But that's a different topic. [;)] What about Diana Ross? [sm=banana.gif] LMAO!!! She is supreme only in her own mind......omg i burst out loud on that. "No wind, no rain, no winters cold Can stop me babe, if you are my goal No wind, no rain can stop me babe If you are my goal..."

Level -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 5:06:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: amayos quote: ORIGINAL: IronBear There are threads in various forums which celebrate or advocate Female Supremacy. Mostly they haven't been drowning out other general threads and thus I just passthem by... Female supremists have as much right to their opinions and beliefs as I as a Gorean Free Man do. What does piss me off is when some twirp starts blastinyg her suprenist beliefs in multiple and IMO deliberate attempts to disrupt CM.. I of course refer to that Jassika thing..... I find the volume of her posts have now become offensive on a personal basis to a point a couple of folk have commented to me within the last48 hours that they are considering quittingtheforums, and I cant say I blame them.. IronBear, I can't say I blame you. It's getting tiresome and quite trollish in nature. At first I thought it was amusing, but now it's starting to feel like some weird form of prodomme spam that just won't go away. As soon as she gets zero response to her threads, she'll go away, like a hemorrhoid.

Level -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 5:07:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie i must admit, however, a dislike for the term "supreme" in any regard, other than when i refer to my Supreme Being. But that's a different topic. [;)] What about Diana Ross? [sm=banana.gif] LMAO!!! She is supreme only in her own mind......omg i burst out loud on that. "No wind, no rain, no winters cold Can stop me babe, if you are my goal No wind, no rain can stop me babe If you are my goal..." laughs................good, bursting out loud is good for the digestive tract.

ownedgirlie -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 5:07:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level As soon as she gets zero response to her threads, she'll go away, like a hemorrhoid. Agreed...yet look at the attention she gets (and i am guilty of it) - - even the subject of her is woven into this thread!

Slipstreme -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 6:06:33 PM)
I don't believe in supremacy either way, regardless on what kind of supremacy is being claimed

RiotGirl -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 6:38:36 PM)
Why do i keep missing all the good stuff? Who what where? Who jessika what jessika whats she doing? Why would some one leave? Why not ignore it? Why not the mods put her on moderation? Ya know i miss all the interesting stuff. <snorts> As for male supermacy (does an irish thing) /nods i believe in it. i believe All men are superior to me and i am superior to all women. i suppose that makes me a supreme being. <grins wickedly> If only that were true! Serious, i do believe in male supremacy.. but its such a troublesome thing to say. Female supremacy is a laugh to me and i seriously dont get it.. but each to their own eh? Though i prefer not to speak up as well ya get yelled at for saying it. i've been told my opionons are so against the feminist movement.. Yes its a double standard. Female superiority is okay to talk about.. male superiority isnt. It as mentioned comes from the feminist movement and women having to fight so hard for rights. Just kind of like the whole colour thing. Which is a also a double standard. A misguided one.. but whatever. Its there. Might as well get along.. </wicked grin> i mean sheesh whose going to put together an anti feminist march to put all women back in the place they belong? <starts daydreaming of the anti feminist march...> /end wicked grin (i'm only joooooooking, please dont take me serious.. well except for the march. Sounds like fun!)

littlesarbonn -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 6:48:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: amayos quote: ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn Sure, some Neanderthals are still walking around... * Screeching Break Sound * Wait. So in being a female supremacist, does this likewise make you neanderthal in thought, or are you somehow more enlightened because of it? Please assure me I'm taking something out of context! First, I never claimed to be enlightened. Second, I'd be opposite of Neanderthal (homo neanderthalensis), which would probably fit me more into homo antecessor (Explorer Man) but with the right woman I'm sure I could end up as homo ergaster (Working Man). Third, the point that keeps getting missed in EVERY supremacist discussion I end up in, I DON'T ADVOCATE IT FOR ANYONE ELSE.

amayos -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 7:04:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn First, I never claimed to be enlightened. Second, I'd be opposite of Neanderthal (homo neanderthalensis)... Heheh, uh huh. In other words, yes—you consider the other camp more enlightened. But that sentiment would be consistent with your lifestyle.

nicochan -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 7:31:11 PM)
Well, we could have the check boxes for "Male dominance," "Female dominance," "Male submission," and "Female submission" and everyone would be happy. [:)] Personally, i would check Male and Female dominance as interests/activities/whatever. i was also hoping to kind of mirror a 1950's way of defining marital/relationship duties in the home as well. Here i was thinking i had been born in the wrong half of the century! [:D]

Takethiswaltz -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 7:56:46 PM)
Littlesarbonn, I think you are sharp as a tack and quite self-enlightened. I enjoy your posts very much. Tara

littlesarbonn -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 8:16:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Takethiswaltz Littlesarbonn, I think you are sharp as a tack and quite self-enlightened. I enjoy your posts very much. Tara Thank you. That was very kind of you to say.

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 9:05:39 PM)
There is definitely a double standard. But I think perhaps it's listed while male supremacy is not because female supremacy is a definite common kink while male supremacy isn't. Why that is...I'm sure that's a long complicated story of cultural dynamics through past and present history.

amayos -> RE: Missing lifestyle interest? (3/26/2006 11:08:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross There is definitely a double standard. But I think perhaps it's listed while male supremacy is not because female supremacy is a definite common kink while male supremacy isn't. Why that is...I'm sure that's a long complicated story of cultural dynamics through past and present history. I'm not so sure if the subject at hand isn't a common kink, but you may very well be right; thus far not one male here has identified as such, but some females have. Lack of interest, cultural brainwashing or social pragmatism on the part of males? Whatever the reason, it is curious.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875