|
thornhappy -> RE: THOUGHT CONTROL: Radiofrequency Weapons (2/19/2010 5:24:01 PM)
|
I thought 70kHz was just the switching rate of the stereo signals (L/R).
Another problem with the theory is that you wouldn't be able to restrict the signal to one individual, like they thought they could do with Koresh. Everybody in the area would've "heard God".
From wired:
Geoff Schoenbaum, a neuroscientist at the University of Maryland's School of Medicine, said that he was unaware of any scientific work specifically underpinning the technology described in SSRM Tek.
"There's no question your brain is able to perceive things below your ability to consciously express or identify," Schoenbaum said. He noted for example, studies showing that images displayed for milliseconds -- too short for people to perceive consciously -- may influence someone's mood. "That kind of thing is reasonable, and there's good experimental evidence behind it."
The problem, he said, is that there is no science he is aware of that can produce the specificity or sensitivity to pick out a terrorist, let alone influence behavior. "We're still working at the level of how rats learn that light predicts food," he explained. "That's the level of modern neuroscience." Developments in neuroscience, he noted, are followed closely. "If we could do (what they're talking about), you would know about it," Schoenbaum said. "It wouldn't be a handful of Russian folks in a basement."
Here's an excerpt from the Microwave News article:
Dr. George Bake rof the Defense Nuclear Agency in Washington
titled hispaper8'RF Weapons: A Very Attractive Nonlethal
Option." But it is difficult to how, based on unclassified
information, whether or not this "option" has ever been used.
Reports have circulated that the US military has EMl and HPM
weapons in its arsenal and that these may have been used during
the Gulf War (see MWN, MM/J92 and Sl092). There were also
allegations that non-ionizing radiation was used against the
women's peace activist encampment at Greenham Common in
the U.K. in the mid-1980s (see MUn, SlO86).
The guys writing the APFN article assume these weapons are in mass production with no proof.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
Actually when stereo TVs came out the bandwidth was increased to around 70 Khz. When FM stereo came out it's bandwidth was increased to about 32 Khz and even higher when the SCO signals were encoded into it. In each case the needed "difference" signal was impessed via suppressed carrier DSB modulation. In the case of the FM, a 19 Khz pilot (sync) signal was impressed and in TVs the carrier was lock to the horizontal sync at 15.734 Khz.
In a high fidelity system, this pilot or subcarrier must be filtered from the output. This is usually done with a PLL these days, in the past it was a simple bandstop filter. The PLL can be fooled. If there is no difference signal transmitted, an asynchronous signal could be made to pass. However then it must be reproduced to work.
But now, we have the ubiquitous TV set. Many of them have two way speaker systems. That is they have tweeters. The bandwidth of the analog BTSC signal is 12 Khz, so they need tweeters like a hole in the head. When the woofers blow out which are actually full range drivers, you can hardly hear the tweeters unless you turn it way up. So just what are these tweeters reproducing that is significant ? Or are they just for looks ?
I am not getting out the tinfoil yet, but I am here to tell you that it is indeed possible. I can prove it, but please go to wiki or something first. By presenting just how the systems work(ed) and teaching one to read schematics of older equipment I can prove it hands down. It is possible.
However it is quite effective just to bury the subliminal message in the normal content.
T
|
|
|
|
