|
thornhappy -> RE: 911----All those People! Why Hasnt Anyone Talked? (2/17/2010 4:44:22 PM)
|
The planes are made, for the most part, of aluminum and/or titanium. Steel's too heavy for the structural stuff; the engines probably have most of the steel.
The composites are fairly limited: "Advanced composites such as graphite/epoxy are used in control surfaces (including rudder, elevators and ailerons), aerodynamic fairings, engine cowlings and landing gear doors."
I saw scorching on the ground in PA, and amazingly enough, most of the photos are from "truther" sites.
http://stj911.org/evidence/docs/P200059_1.jpg
http://www.fishy911.org/img/flight93.jpg
When you come down at a sharp angle (the pitch angle was 40 degrees down), at 500 knots, there isn't going to be much left. Remember Valuejet? It was in a bunch of teeny pieces.
There are good explanations out there of why the whole in the Pentagon is so small, and photos of the airframe and engine parts, but they were disregarded here.
Countless crashes have fuselages that were consumed by fire. I saw one myself at LAX. They happen all the time.
It doesn't violate the laws of aerodynamics to fly at 500 mph, or it couldn't have happened. Which laws are you talking about? Top speed of a 757 is 609 mph.
All the pilots were for crap, but they managed to fly them. The hard part would be making a controlled (note the word controlled) landing at a commercial airport.
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pedestrian
I have never posted here before but have been reading this one. I agree with those that feel as if there is extreme reasonable doubt as to whether 9/11 came off just as we were told. But, I know a few things about mechanics and have been researching 9/11 myself as much as I can now and over the last couple of years. I am begining to get real pissed-off and mostly at the govt. secrecy surrounding this attack.
So from what I saw on 9/11 on TV through the following years and putting a few things together I have come to the conclusion that the admin. story is about the wildest conspiracy theory I've ever heard.
For example on the subject of these aircraft. I, looking at science and recorded TV since, try what one might call comparative reasoning. Let's compare results.
BTW, not that we are really seeking the truth but those planes' structures are made of titanium and steel, the engines 6 tons each and trust me, they do not vaporize on contact.
It has never ceased during my reading, to amaze me how I am being asked to believe that these planes can all burn so, so hot and to do all of that damage to the WTC, even bringing down a building one didn't hit, yet do not burn themselves up.
Am I being asked to believe that they burn what 800-1500 degrees maybe even hotter as an operating temp. but what, 3500 degrees when it hits something ? How ? Why ? I don't.
I am being asked to believe that two jets, each bringing down more steel than an aircraft carrier, while others leave only a small hole in the Pentagon and not even scorching the ground in PA. I don't.
Am I being asked to believe that a rookie (somebody kicked out of flight school for incompetence) did not only a majestic 270 degree turn but defied the laws of aerodynamics flying this jet airliner 400-500 mph only a few feet off the ground ? I don't.
So I have come to a new conclusion, if a commercial jet airliner hit the pentagon or crashed in the dirt pit in Pa. that I saw on TV where the Somerset Co., Pa. coroner did his interview, and almost but not entirely vaporized on contact, then I am the fucking queen of Egypt.
|
|
|
|
