quote:

sure if you told me that a "PIECE" of an airplane hit your house.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Note that all photographic evidence that the liar uses comes from media sources. The same media sources that showed the second plane hitting. Why does he think anything shown on those films is real? According to him its all special effects done to fool us all anyway. (despite the fact that it was all shown from multiple angles in real time.)

You got that backwards as always ken.   See people who chop up the guberements reports and claims of ally craeda CONSPIRACY THEORY 10 hijackers and all that.....well they call us the truthers see.

People who side with the government after the wonderful wmd experience have grown to knmow and love them as LIARS.  

Its really quite simple.

SO YOU NOW CLAIM NO PLANE HIT THE TOWER THEN???????

Oh wait more double talk.  Its fake because its media but real because its real time?

Have you taken your meds today ken? 

You are babbling aimlessly again. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

FR

why are the 911 liars always so incredibly fucking stoopid?

LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

then they carted off all the steel and melted it down with in hours!  the disaster of the century- one would save the evidence for the trial!!!

and to learn for the future how to design buildings and evac plans.  this it worse then the Gulf of Tompkin,.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I mean I have no evidence that Hitler ever performed the Holy burnt offering, the Olah sacrifice to G-D.

So do you have any evidence that Hitler did the Ritual Sacrifice?

You arent that stoopid that you do not know that a holocaust is a fully burned offering that is a sacrifice of an animal of human to G-D.   I mean you do know that do you not?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

FR

why are the 911 liars always so incredibly fucking stoopid?

LOL

Quit asking yourself questions.

As for the OP link, yes Lafolley is lying. Maybe it is because he was sacked from the WTC. Maybe he just wants more free publicity.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I really can't figure out your obsession with the original definition of a holocaust.  It only was applied to Jewish sacrifices when the Tanakh was translated into Greek.  And it also applied to Greek sacrifices:

These are the two ideal types of Greek sacrificial ritual; they are appropriate to different divinities, done for different purposes, and conducted by different methods. Holocausts are apotropaic rituals, intended to appease the spirits of the Underworld, including the Greek heroes, who are spirits of the dead; they are also given to malign powers, such as the Keres and Hecate. One of the earliest attested holocausts was Xenophon's offering of pigs to Zeus Meilichius.[1]

Holocausts are conducted at night, without wine, and offer black-hided animals at a low altar, with their heads directed downwards; in all these they are opposed to the commensal sacrifice given to the Olympian gods. (This distinction is between extreme types, and was somewhat exaggerated in the early twentieth century, as by Jane Harrison; considerable evidence has been also been found of commensal sacrifice offered to heroes.)[2]

I've seen "holocaust" used to describe a variety of events ranging from the firestorms in Peshtigo, WI and Chicago (on the same day), and the bombings at Dresden, Nagasaki, and Hiroshima. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I mean I have no evidence that Hitler ever performed the Holy burnt offering, the Olah sacrifice to G-D.

So do you have any evidence that Hitler did the Ritual Sacrifice?

You arent that stoopid that you do not know that a holocaust is a fully burned offering that is a sacrifice of an animal of human to G-D.   I mean you do know that do you not?

quote:

well I htink people like you are funny you see.

I mean I have no evidence that Hitler ever performed the Holy burnt offering, the Olah sacrifice to G-D.

So do you have any evidence that Hitler did the Ritual Sacrifice?

You arent that stoopid that you do not know that a holocaust is a fully burned offering that is a sacrifice of an animal of human to G-D.   I mean you do know that do you not?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne



well you see words have meanings that have etymology that dates back to the begining of time.

Retards using words completely incorrectly destroy the language as have the attorneys done.

You want to hang yourself with literary suicide be my guest but do not expect me to join you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I really can't figure out your obsession with the original definition of a holocaust.  It only was applied to Jewish sacrifices when the Tanakh was translated into Greek.  And it also applied to Greek sacrifices:

These are the two ideal types of Greek sacrificial ritual; they are appropriate to different divinities, done for different purposes, and conducted by different methods. Holocausts are apotropaic rituals, intended to appease the spirits of the Underworld, including the Greek heroes, who are spirits of the dead; they are also given to malign powers, such as the Keres and Hecate. One of the earliest attested holocausts was Xenophon's offering of pigs to Zeus Meilichius.[1]

Holocausts are conducted at night, without wine, and offer black-hided animals at a low altar, with their heads directed downwards; in all these they are opposed to the commensal sacrifice given to the Olympian gods. (This distinction is between extreme types, and was somewhat exaggerated in the early twentieth century, as by Jane Harrison; considerable evidence has been also been found of commensal sacrifice offered to heroes.)[2]

I've seen "holocaust" used to describe a variety of events ranging from the firestorms in Peshtigo, WI and Chicago (on the same day), and the bombings at Dresden, Nagasaki, and Hiroshima. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I mean I have no evidence that Hitler ever performed the Holy burnt offering, the Olah sacrifice to G-D.

So do you have any evidence that Hitler did the Ritual Sacrifice?

You arent that stoopid that you do not know that a holocaust is a fully burned offering that is a sacrifice of an animal of human to G-D.   I mean you do know that do you not?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

well I htink people like you are funny you see.

I mean I have no evidence that Hitler ever performed the Holy burnt offering, the Olah sacrifice to G-D.

So do you have any evidence that Hitler did the Ritual Sacrifice?

You arent that stoopid that you do not know that a holocaust is a fully burned offering that is a sacrifice of an animal of human to G-D.   I mean you do know that do you not?

That is a very well executed dodge - arguing definitions rather than context - but you know perfectly well what I mean.

I ask you again, for the last time, do you deny that the Holocaust occured? 

quote:

you certainly are reasonable arent you?   You want a black and white answer in a gray world.  That and when you get into reality its a colorful world.  I am sorry if you were not able to process my answer into a peg you can relate too.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Greek civilization is hardly "the beginning of time", and the translation of the Tanakh into the Septuagint was done around 70ad, IIRC.  Holocaust was used to describe Jewish sacrifices only because of some base similarities with the Greek tradition (Jewish tradition is much older than the Greek civilization).  So it seems you are the one misusing this term.  As usual though, you offer up no proof but your own declarations, when things aren't going your way.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne



well you see words have meanings that have etymology that dates back to the begining of time.

Retards using words completely incorrectly destroy the language as have the attorneys done.

You want to hang yourself with literary suicide be my guest but do not expect me to join you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I really can't figure out your obsession with the original definition of a holocaust.  It only was applied to Jewish sacrifices when the Tanakh was translated into Greek.  And it also applied to Greek sacrifices:

These are the two ideal types of Greek sacrificial ritual; they are appropriate to different divinities, done for different purposes, and conducted by different methods. Holocausts are apotropaic rituals, intended to appease the spirits of the Underworld, including the Greek heroes, who are spirits of the dead; they are also given to malign powers, such as the Keres and Hecate. One of the earliest attested holocausts was Xenophon's offering of pigs to Zeus Meilichius.[1]

Holocausts are conducted at night, without wine, and offer black-hided animals at a low altar, with their heads directed downwards; in all these they are opposed to the commensal sacrifice given to the Olympian gods. (This distinction is between extreme types, and was somewhat exaggerated in the early twentieth century, as by Jane Harrison; considerable evidence has been also been found of commensal sacrifice offered to heroes.)[2]

I've seen "holocaust" used to describe a variety of events ranging from the firestorms in Peshtigo, WI and Chicago (on the same day), and the bombings at Dresden, Nagasaki, and Hiroshima. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I mean I have no evidence that Hitler ever performed the Holy burnt offering, the Olah sacrifice to G-D.

So do you have any evidence that Hitler did the Ritual Sacrifice?

You arent that stoopid that you do not know that a holocaust is a fully burned offering that is a sacrifice of an animal of human to G-D.   I mean you do know that do you not?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

you certainly are reasonable arent you?   You want a black and white answer in a gray world.  That and when you get into reality its a colorful world.  I am sorry if you were not able to process my answer into a peg you can relate too.

Actually, you have answered my question.

Goodbye.