RE: A legend returns ...

RE: A legend returns ... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

Message

xxblushesxx -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 4:42:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WyldHrt quote: You idiot, the screen shot is also present in the THREAD itself, that I myself posted the link to. D'oh! No, it isn't. It came from a thread that has since been deleted by the mods, and you know it. quote: Yes. I started one of many extra profiles (for a few reasons) and thisone I started so fast i think I accidentally saved it that way. I later changed it back to transgendered male/Native American/6'4"/19yo/New York City, Idaho that sort of thing. I also have a photo next to it. of a very definite female. Keep talking, as it is amusing watching you dig. So, you posted a profile as a male... then changed it BACK to transgendered male. Got it. quote: Seriously? I will say it again. Get a life. I addressed this already. Please try to keep up. quote: If you think that stating your gender on one of many website profiles, is what proves your gender, then there really is no hope for you. All I can say is, there is a life outside of the internet and no matter what you all think, I am still freaking hot. So deal with it. The pic and gender ID in your former profile speak for themselves. As to life outside the internet, there most certainly is. That said, many of us "meet" here first, then move to real life where we become closer friends, hang out, play together, party, and all kinds of neat stuff. Kind of hard to make that move when you are lying from the get go about your gender, though. God Wyld, I love you! If Wendydarling keeps lying about what she said in that "hey Wendy" thread, I'm sure a nice mod can come along and bring it all up again. (this is just one reason why entire threads should not be pulled; if the words are still there, they have to be accountable for them.)

BLoved -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:09:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland quote: Whose logic? Yours or mine? What standard are you applying to determine which of us is applying a superior form of logic? Which of us has a greater insight into what is occurring here to decide how best to proceed? The very definition of logic is that there is no forms, and is independent of individual personalities and experiences. Logic is simply cause and effect and reasoning and rationality.It's not some wishy washy crap. In other words, it is only as good as the person applying it ;)

BLoved -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:19:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stella41b You can be one of them. It's just a matter of will. Your will. You have that ability deep within you. You were born with it. You're a human being. It doesn't depend on other people. It depends only on you. Yes, I know. All this ridicule, the character assasination, the innuendos and outright falshehoods, they will all end ... ... all I have to do is sanction casual bdsm, "be one of them" ... ~smile~ Nice try. Not going to happen without a much better argument than the immaturity so obvious in this thread. But then, let's face it, none of you actually have a valid argument. Despite all the posts to this thread, none has been presented. The best you can do is cast aspersions on the one who disagrees with you, you can't argue the logic and say "here, here is where your logic is lacking". So, as much as I appreciate the offer to end your hostilities if I merely capitulate without a valid argument to convince me, the fact remains you cannot coerce honest agreement out of me through character assasination. I guess you'll just have to continue acting in the childish manner we've seen so much of in this thread.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:40:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BLoved quote: ORIGINAL: stella41b You can be one of them. It's just a matter of will. Your will. You have that ability deep within you. You were born with it. You're a human being. It doesn't depend on other people. It depends only on you. Yes, I know. All this ridicule, the character assasination, the innuendos and outright falshehoods, they will all end ... ... all I have to do is sanction casual bdsm, "be one of them" ... ~smile~ Nice try. Not going to happen without a much better argument than the immaturity so obvious in this thread. But then, let's face it, none of you actually have a valid argument. Despite all the posts to this thread, none has been presented. The best you can do is cast aspersions on the one who disagrees with you, you can't argue the logic and say "here, here is where your logic is lacking". So, as much as I appreciate the offer to end your hostilities if I merely capitulate without a valid argument to convince me, the fact remains you cannot coerce honest agreement out of me through character assasination. I guess you'll just have to continue acting in the childish manner we've seen so much of in this thread. You know, what you have said here is so blatantly wrong . Absolutely no one has told you that you have to accept casual Bdsm. All we have said is, it may not be right for you but it doesnt make it harmful for all and we are the adults that choose for ourselves. The fact that you have refused to see that in what we have said and use a "collective immaturity" to not look into the logic presented, makes immaturity evident, but not so much in other posters, save for ones who can not grow mentally or expand their thinking mentally or emotionally. The ironic thing is many of us here, including me, do not participate in casual bdsm. I made a choice not to because I was going through some negative emotional things and it was not healthy at the time. I made that decision on my own. For me, it was wrong. But i have seen countless others who it was not harmful and when I engaged during happier times, it was fun and I trusted the people I was playing with. We were friends that I knew and had solid friendships with. So again, no. No one was telling you how to believe as a lot of us choose BDSM with a partner in a relationship. We do stand against your paradigm that you do not bring valid logic or evidence to support your truth that you so easily try to brush as an absolute that must be painted everywhere.

BLoved -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:50:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 Absolutely no one has told you that you have to accept casual Bdsm. All we have said is, it may not be right for you but it doesnt make it harmful for all and we are the adults that choose for ourselves. In other words, you want me to sanction casual bdsm. Not going to hapen without a better argument than this. Replace the words "casual bdsm" with any of the activities we're not allowed to mention on this site and you have the same reasoning being used to justify all sorts of activities. Ergo, the reasoning is flawed. People choose all sorts of harmful activities, doesn't make the activities harmless just because someone chooses to act that way. Nor do the numbers of people who believe it is harmless make it so, just as the number of people who believed the world was flat didn't make the world flat. You have no rational argument and until I am convinced I am not going to sanction casual bdsm for anyone. Not that this matters ... people do what they wish regardless of what I believe. Sorry, but the "good cop/bad cop" routine isn't going to help you here. Without a rational argument you will just have to resort to your favorite tactic: character assasination.

Raiikun -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 6:14:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BLoved In other words, you want me to sanction casual bdsm. Not going to hapen without a better argument than this. On the flip side, you want us to not sanction casual bdsm. Not going to happen without a much better argument than what you supply. quote: Nor do the numbers of people who believe it is harmless make it so, just as the number of people who believed the world was flat didn't make the world flat. Nor does the few people who believe it to be harmful make it so, just as the number of people who believed the world flat didn't make it flat.

lusciouslips19 -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 6:23:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Raiikun quote: ORIGINAL: BLoved In other words, you want me to sanction casual bdsm. Not going to hapen without a better argument than this. On the flip side, you want us to not sanction casual bdsm. Not going to happen without a much better argument than what you supply. quote: Nor do the numbers of people who believe it is harmless make it so, just as the number of people who believed the world was flat didn't make the world flat. Nor does the few people who believe it to be harmful make it so, just as the number of people who believed the world flat didn't make it flat. I was going to say this.

Raiikun -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 6:35:23 AM)
Personally, at first I found his extensive use of petitio principii with a touch of argumentum ad nauseum amusing, but I can see how one might get sick of it really quick.

DesFIP -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 6:47:31 AM)
Some people do casual, and others don't. Either way is correct, for the person involved. I know someone who has committed tennis partners. For over 30 years the same group of friends gather at the bubble once a week to play tennis. None of them would be happy with a casual tennis partner. They are a poly tennis group, all close friends. I also know other people who go down to the courts and ask at the pro shop who doesn't have a partner and is at their general level. They are equally right in doing it that way. And I know people who play with the same person each week. A monogamous tennis pair if you will. Equally right for them. OP it is a good thing that you know what you need, it is a bad thing that you believe you know what everyone else needs. You don't.

ResidentSadist -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 6:49:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BLoved In other words, you want me to sanction casual bdsm. . . . Good Morning Robert & Readers, By this point, here on page 44 of this thread, I think you are gonna’ have to cough up much more than a passive act like sanctioning something. In order to satisfy us, your readers, I think you are going to have to immediately go to the nearest dungeon, find some lonely submissive and partake in thrill seeking casual BDSM with her . . . repeatedly. I’m talking about whipping her silly until you connect with her inner beast. Beat her until she looks into your eyes and cries deeply and uncontrollably, until she cries for daddy, cries for herself and bares her soul to you in primal release. Robert, when she shares her soul, her sacred trembling and sobbing heart, I want you to use that bond, that closeness and fuck the living shit out of her. Violently fuck her face until she is choking on the froth and it comes spewing out her nose. Then roughly toss her face down on the ground and stuff your frothy cock up her ass . . . not gently, not passionately . . . but violently in an act of anal domination. After raping her ass with careless abandon, wipe your cock off on her face, throw her down on her back and look deep into her tear filled eyes as you pack her cunt full with your throbbing man meat. Look her in the eye as pump her for your own casual, thrill seeking pleasure. Grab throat, take her air and stop her breath as you approach orgasm . . . and when you release, tell her you used her for your own pleasure. If you must be romantic and fluffy, and only if she was good girl and wore cheap mascara that left stains on her cheeks, you can tell her she ‘served you well’. Go commit some basic carnal acts and get your rocks offs. As for me, I haven’t had my breakfast or coffee yet today. See you guys later! Best Wishes, Kalon Eric

GreedyTop -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 6:50:45 AM)
ok, that was just hawt.....

VirginPotty -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 6:56:56 AM)
[sm=agree.gif][sm=agree.gif][sm=agree.gif][sm=agree.gif][sm=agree.gif]

BLoved -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 7:31:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Raiikun quote: ORIGINAL: BLoved In other words, you want me to sanction casual bdsm. Not going to hapen without a better argument than this. On the flip side, you want us to not sanction casual bdsm. Not going to happen without a much better argument than what you supply. quote: Nor do the numbers of people who believe it is harmless make it so, just as the number of people who believed the world was flat didn't make the world flat. Nor does the few people who believe it to be harmful make it so, just as the number of people who believed the world flat didn't make it flat. And if I were to follow the example of the casual advocates I would have to post hundreds of times telling one and all you are an idiot. Fortunately, they are not the kind of examples I wish to follow.

juliaoceania -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 7:31:55 AM)
quote: Okay, so you believe in true love, and you want everybody to accept that it's your creed, so why then are you looking to other people to make the first move? Why not go out there, out into the real world, and make true love your creed through your own actions, through what you do, and through what you project outwards towards other people? Amen... quote: This is what a lot of people out there in the real world are doing. It doesn't have to be romantic love, of a partner or in a monogamous relationship, it could be someone in their family, it could be friends, it could be expressed through the work they do, through the interests and pursuits, but it is there, and it is expressed, it is part of someone's life and it is projected outwards through their actions, behaviour, attitudes and words. You can demonstrate love in the world or find it for yourself and try to stash it away and keep it, so true stella

juliaoceania -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 7:34:07 AM)
quote: White after labor day = bad I thought we established that white after labor day is good, just like casual is good...

BLoved -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 7:38:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesFIP Some people do casual, and others don't. Either way is correct, for the person involved. Some people do unprotected sex knowing they have AIDs, and others don't. Either way is correct, for the person involved. Some people do the activities we cannot mention on this site, and others don't. Either way is correct, for the person involved. Still believe your reasoning to be flawless?

juliaoceania -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 7:38:30 AM)
quote: People choose all sorts of harmful activities, doesn't make the activities harmless just because someone chooses to act that way. 60 percent of marriages fail and marriages that stay together despite the nastiness within them harm even more children than the divorces do.. marriage ergo is a harmful and risky institution...[:D]

BLoved -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 7:41:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist Go commit some basic carnal acts and get your rocks offs. Without love, I have no interest in sex or bdsm with anyone.

GreedyTop -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 7:43:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BLoved quote: ORIGINAL: DesFIP Some people do casual, and others don't. Either way is correct, for the person involved. Some people do unprotected sex knowing they have AIDs, and others don't. Either way is correct, for the person involved. Some people do the activities we cannot mention on this site, and others don't. Either way is correct, for the person involved. Still believe your reasoning to be flawless? Edited for clarity: Bobbo.. this post, IMO, refutes your entire stance on this thread (and apparently, in your profile): meaning/.. THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTES, despite what you have been claiming.

mnottertail -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 7:44:00 AM)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsCXZczTQXo masturbate to this one, Bob.

Page: << < prev 42 43 [44] 45 46 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625