RE: A legend returns ... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


xxblushesxx -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:14:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland

quote:

You are a lying fucktard.

You and booby are a perfect match.


That was intelligent of you, as usual, GB. (And as usual, I am sure you have ZERO evidence or logic behind your libelling me as a liar.) You will now become #3. on my Hide list.

Ta ta forever!



:::runs over and gives greedy a hug:::

I wonder who #1 was?

*shyly waves wand and smiles with semi-false modesty*




BLoved -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:15:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

You know what? I did it. I apologize for the ridiculous length of this post, but hey-he did ask sooo nicely.
I've removed the lines between paragraphs from Bob's writing in an attempt to save my own sanity.

quote:

Are you a good judge of character?
Every now and then I see someone saying we shouldn't judge others.
Which of us doesn't judge a liar who deceives us?
Which of us doesn't judge an abuser who abuses us?


All the examples you have provided are of people who have done personal harm to the person judging; How does this relate to you judging someone who has done you no personal harm, for example someone you have never met engaging in an activity in which you are entirely uninvolved?


Are you saying I have to experience spousal abuse before I can condemn it?

quote:


Are the only two states of feeling you can conceive of 'true love' and 'nothing at all'?


Am I supposed to treat that as a serious question?

quote:

quote:

We each must judge for ourselves what is and is not "abusive". We each must take our stand opposing that which we judge to be abusive.
How else will we know which of us have thought this out, and which of us are here for a cheap thrill?


This seems to imply that the only way you can measure someone's 'seriousness' is by whether or not they object to the behaviours of others; this from a man who considers himself entirely self-actualized...


I believe that anyone who hasn't developed a clear understanding of what is and is not abuse is not dealing with bdsm in a responsible manner.

quote:




quote:

Isn't it strange so many seek multiple partners for no-strings-attached casual play, yet so few mention the risk of disease? Why am I not surprised? Isn't it common knowledge that the more you sleep around, the more likely you are to spread disease?
How many of you have partners who don't love you enough to protect you from that risk? Why are you risking your lives for them? So they can have a second woman in bed to make up for what you lack?
Think about it.


Casual play does not equal casual sex. You are conflating two entirely different issues. It is perfectly possible to play casually with multiple partners without any exchange of bodily fluids and with sterilized equipment; no risk of disease...


You are compartmentalizing the physical while ignoring the emotional aspect.

Both bdsm and sex are forms of Intimacy and both evoke the same emotional needs in a healthy person.

quote:




quote:

Don't be fooled by the wolves in sheep's clothing who speak of "friendship". They're the ones who won't tell you that casual bdsm is linked to emotional abuse.
Why?
They're already damaged and they don't care if they damage you, just as long as they get to use your body for their own amusement.
How do you know? Well, think about it.
If you found your true love, would you have time to waste looking for "friends" here? Wouldn't the two of you have enough friends in your own lives to keep you busy? Wouldn't your true love be enough to satisfy all your bdsm needs?
What kind of 'beloved' would he be if he won't make you feel you are all the woman he needs in his life?
What kind of relationship would require you to constantly pimp yourself to other women so as to keep your man happy?
Compare "rinnie" with "DeviousD64". Same couple, very different stories.
Casual players are "devious", pure and simple. They have to be to fool their victims.


When I do find a loving partner I may well stop playing casually, so it is not for me to answer this section. However, with regards to the bolded part someone like Aqua springs to mind; reading her posts I get the impression that it's not Val who 'makes' her play casually-she does it because she wants to.


I would suspect low self-esteem in someone who feels compelled to participate in the casual scene despite being in a committed loving relationship.

quote:




quote:

How can anyone keep looking for "friends" year after year and not have a full social calendar?
Because they keep using up the "friends" they find.


Someone who can't make room for new friends is someone I pity, as is someone who isn't 'looking for friends year after year'-the moment you stop finding friends in this world is the moment you might as well just give up.


I have friends I've known for more than a quarter-century. They are tried and true, stand-up kind of friends.

The more friends you have, the less time you have for any one of them.

Bear in mind I distinguish between friends and acquaintances.

quote:


quote:

That's because "friend" is just a euphemism for "fresh meat".
They live in denial, so don't be surprised that they try to deceive you. When you've been around long enough you see the same lines written by the same people about each of their partners, only to be replaced by new partners at regular intervals.
For some people, the only way they believe they can keep the interest of their partner is to pimp themselves in the hopes that providing a constant supply of fresh meat for the bedroom will win them favour.


I am sure that there are couples for whom this is true. But there are also people who just like people. Maybe you find this hard to comprehend, or something, but being in a relationship with someone doesn't mean that you have to cut off the rest of the world.


I did not say one must be cut off.

quote:

quote:

It is all nothing more than a cheap thrill to them, so don't let anyone divert you from your path to true love.
They're not worth the aggravation you'll feel later.


What, so all the friends you have ever had inevitably caused you aggravation? Either you are exaggerating massively for the sake of melodrama, or that is very very sad.


People using people to satisfy their lust are not "friends", regardless of the effort to present themselves that way.

quote:



quote:

Why does bdsm attract so many broken women?
Just how "responsible" would a man have to be to involve a broken woman in bdsm? Taking advantage of her insecurities to manipulate her into giving him whatever he wishes?
What kind of man settles for a broken woman?
If you need fixing, you shouldn't be involved in bdsm.


First off, a definition of 'broken' would be helpful here. You keep calling this an essay, so I expect some essay structure; part of that is defining your terms.

Unless you inform me otherwise, I'm guessing by broken you mean abused, or something similar. In which case the statement what kind of man settles for a broken woman? makes me feel sick. Someone else can pick this point up if they want; I'm not going to.


I am speaking of someone who is suffering from a mental or emotional dysfunction. Low self-esteem, trust issues, etc.

quote:



quote:

BDSM without Love is just another form of abuse.
If risking your life doesn't deserve love, respect, commitment, just what is your life worth?


'Risking your life'?! A minute ago you were talking in terms of SSC; since when did we get to life-risks? As a side note, play does deserve respect in my book. I don't play with anybody I don't respect.


Allowing someone to render you helpless is to risk your life.

quote:



OH MY GOD I'VE GOD THIS FAR THROUGH AND NOW I REALISE THE ESSAY HASN'T EVEN STARTED YET.
bugger.

You know what? I can't cope with the essay right now. I'll post this, and maybe have a bash at covering the essay tomorrow.




~smile~

I appreciate the effort.




Mercnbeth -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:17:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
Bob,
It's amazing that some of the "trolls" (as you label them) that are in mono-relationships and don't engage in casual BDSM are even up against you here. What's your theory or notion on that?

quote:

Original: xxblushesxx
*waves hand/paw/whatever it is trolls have* That would be me!


Ditto blushes! We qualify for our 7 year pin on March 1.
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
He covered that back when this thread was only 20-something pages long or less.... we are unwilling to claim moral high ground even though we secretly agree with him[8|]


However, considering I'm living up to bob's image of 'ideal'; I may have to reassess my plans for a nice quiet private romantic weekend with beth and instead get out there and track down something casual and 'strange'! [sm=shake.gif][sm=whip.gif]

What do you say Julia, I know we've had our differences in the past, but under the circumstances perhaps you and Sinergy can come over to our place this weekend to avoid being labeled the poster children for bob's 'BDSM Love Manifesto'? [sm=waves.gif]

Come clean bob, not counting your hands, how many different partners have you had over the past 7 years?




VaguelyCurious -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:17:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland

thishereboi is #2 on my Hide list.


Woooo Hoooo, my first silver



Lucky. I don't think I've ever made it to anyone's top three block list. [:D]


Would you like me to temporarily block you, so we can both have the experience?

I've never blocked anyone, you've never been someone's first blockee...

Go on: offend me, Aqua...

:P




BLoved -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:21:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
Bob,
It's amazing that some of the "trolls" (as you label them) that are in mono-relationships and don't engage in casual BDSM are even up against you here. What's your theory or notion on that?


Acceptance here comes with a price.




thishereboi -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:23:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4

I've managed to work up version 3 in honor of this thread.



[image]local://upfiles/718516/CE698E5DE785425CB44F8924633B489F.gif[/image]


Ya know, I always thought there was something strange about those night elves[8D]




xxblushesxx -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:26:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland

thishereboi is #2 on my Hide list.


Woooo Hoooo, my first silver



Lucky. I don't think I've ever made it to anyone's top three block list. [:D]


Would you like me to temporarily block you, so we can both have the experience?

I've never blocked anyone, you've never been someone's first blockee...

Go on: offend me, Aqua...

:P



[sm=popcorn.gif][sm=pillowfight.gif]




thishereboi -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:26:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b

This thread has become the Beavis and Butthead Show of the Collarme boards. 


Maybe we can get the mods to rename it.[:)]






thishereboi -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:30:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland

quote:

You are a lying fucktard.

You and booby are a perfect match.


That was intelligent of you, as usual, GB. (And as usual, I am sure you have ZERO evidence or logic behind your libelling me as a liar.) You will now become #3. on my Hide list.

Ta ta forever!



:::runs over and gives greedy a hug:::

I wonder who #1 was?

*shyly waves wand and smiles with semi-false modesty*


Aww blushes, what a great group to be in[:)]




DarkSteven -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:31:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland

thishereboi is #2 on my Hide list.


Woooo Hoooo, my first silver



Someone's been watching too much Olympics...




xxblushesxx -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:32:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland

quote:

You are a lying fucktard.

You and booby are a perfect match.


That was intelligent of you, as usual, GB. (And as usual, I am sure you have ZERO evidence or logic behind your libelling me as a liar.) You will now become #3. on my Hide list.

Ta ta forever!



:::runs over and gives greedy a hug:::

I wonder who #1 was?

*shyly waves wand and smiles with semi-false modesty*


Aww blushes, what a great group to be in[:)]



WooHoo!! Does the dancy winners' hug with THB and GT!!!




VaguelyCurious -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:34:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious
quote:

Are you a good judge of character?
Every now and then I see someone saying we shouldn't judge others.
Which of us doesn't judge a liar who deceives us?
Which of us doesn't judge an abuser who abuses us?


All the examples you have provided are of people who have done personal harm to the person judging; How does this relate to you judging someone who has done you no personal harm, for example someone you have never met engaging in an activity in which you are entirely uninvolved?


Are you saying I have to experience spousal abuse before I can condemn it?


Your words were 'the abuser who abuses us'-I was responding to what you said.

quote:


quote:


Are the only two states of feeling you can conceive of 'true love' and 'nothing at all'?


Am I supposed to treat that as a serious question?


Ok, it was a bit melodramatic, but I think it stands; you've said previously  that if I play with someone I'm not in love with I don't care about them-over and over in this thread you have ignored or denied the possibility of an emotional spectrum; you really do come across as thinking that human emotion is somehow binary.

quote:


quote:

quote:

We each must judge for ourselves what is and is not "abusive". We each must take our stand opposing that which we judge to be abusive.
How else will we know which of us have thought this out, and which of us are here for a cheap thrill?


This seems to imply that the only way you can measure someone's 'seriousness' is by whether or not they object to the behaviours of others; this from a man who considers himself entirely self-actualized...


I believe that anyone who hasn't developed a clear understanding of what is and is not abuse is not dealing with bdsm in a responsible manner.


What you said was  'How else will we know'-I can think of a thousand ways of telling if someone has thought about something, other than by seeing whether or not they argue with those who disagree with them.

quote:

quote:




quote:

Isn't it strange so many seek multiple partners for no-strings-attached casual play, yet so few mention the risk of disease? Why am I not surprised? Isn't it common knowledge that the more you sleep around, the more likely you are to spread disease?
How many of you have partners who don't love you enough to protect you from that risk? Why are you risking your lives for them? So they can have a second woman in bed to make up for what you lack?
Think about it.


Casual play does not equal casual sex. You are conflating two entirely different issues. It is perfectly possible to play casually with multiple partners without any exchange of bodily fluids and with sterilized equipment; no risk of disease...


You are compartmentalizing the physical while ignoring the emotional aspect.

Both bdsm and sex are forms of Intimacy and both evoke the same emotional needs in a healthy person.


You were talking about disease. What on Earth do a person's emotional needs have to do with the likelihood of spreading STIs? You are changing the subject instead of engaging with my argument that you are conflating sex and play with regards to the risk of disease.

quote:

quote:



quote:

How can anyone keep looking for "friends" year after year and not have a full social calendar?
Because they keep using up the "friends" they find.


Someone who can't make room for new friends is someone I pity, as is someone who isn't 'looking for friends year after year'-the moment you stop finding friends in this world is the moment you might as well just give up.


I have friends I've known for more than a quarter-century. They are tried and true, stand-up kind of friends.

The more friends you have, the less time you have for any one of them.

Bear in mind I distinguish between friends and acquaintances.


Even distinguishing between friends and acquantainces, there is always room for new friends in my life. And I have never found myself in a position where I can't make time for a friend.



quote:



quote:

Why does bdsm attract so many broken women?
Just how "responsible" would a man have to be to involve a broken woman in bdsm? Taking advantage of her insecurities to manipulate her into giving him whatever he wishes?
What kind of man settles for a broken woman?
If you need fixing, you shouldn't be involved in bdsm.


First off, a definition of 'broken' would be helpful here. You keep calling this an essay, so I expect some essay structure; part of that is defining your terms.

Unless you inform me otherwise, I'm guessing by broken you mean abused, or something similar. In which case the statement what kind of man settles for a broken woman? makes me feel sick. Someone else can pick this point up if they want; I'm not going to.


I am speaking of someone who is suffering from a mental or emotional dysfunction. Low self-esteem, trust issues, etc.

Yup, still feeling sickened by your attitude of 'what kind of man would settle', in that case.

quote:

quote:



quote:

BDSM without Love is just another form of abuse.
If risking your life doesn't deserve love, respect, commitment, just what is your life worth?


'Risking your life'?! A minute ago you were talking in terms of SSC; since when did we get to life-risks? As a side note, play does deserve respect in my book. I don't play with anybody I don't respect.


Allowing someone to render you helpless is to risk your life.


That's a matter of opinion-just because play is casual doesn't mean you will play with people you don't feel you can trust entirely.

I'm going to bed pretty soon, so I may not see your reply/may not have the energy to respond if I do.





GreedyTop -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:38:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland

quote:

You are a lying fucktard.

You and booby are a perfect match.


That was intelligent of you, as usual, GB. (And as usual, I am sure you have ZERO evidence or logic behind your libelling me as a liar.) You will now become #3. on my Hide list.

Ta ta forever!



:::runs over and gives greedy a hug:::

I wonder who #1 was?



*hugs thb*

(no idea)




thishereboi -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:39:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: alicenwondrland

thishereboi is #2 on my Hide list.


Woooo Hoooo, my first silver



Someone's been watching too much Olympics...



busted[:)]




JonnieBoy -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:39:24 PM)

Pokes the guy with the size 28 shoes ... and chucks custard pie in his face.

Pirate




purepleasure -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:43:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b

This thread has become the Beavis and Butthead Show of the Collarme boards. 


I agree!

And, I think Beavis left around page 9 of this fiasco. Who knew that Beavis is the smart one?




stella41b -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:43:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JonnieBoy

Pokes the guy with the size 28 shoes ... and chucks custard pie in his face.

Pirate



Somehow I feel that a fishing rod, a spotted toadstool and a quiet spot by the garden pond would go better.




juliaoceania -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:57:17 PM)

quote:

However, considering I'm living up to bob's image of 'ideal'; I may have to reassess my plans for a nice quiet private romantic weekend with beth and instead get out there and track down something casual and 'strange'!

What do you say Julia, I know we've had our differences in the past, but under the circumstances perhaps you and Sinergy can come over to our place this weekend to avoid being labeled the poster children for bob's 'BDSM Love Manifesto'?

Come clean bob, not counting your hands, how many different partners have you had over the past 7 years?


Well... Sinergy works this weekend... and I have to catch up on a bunch of work I have missed due to illness... Especially since he is talking about taking me to go hiking on Catalina on the isthmus soon

I will mention it to him[:)]




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:57:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b
Somehow I feel that a fishing rod, a spotted toadstool and a quiet spot by the garden pond would go better.


That's an insult to gnomes, they have fun casual sex after hours with one another.

Ask my neighbour, when the lights go out they are at it like rabbits hence their genetic diversity.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: A legend returns ... (2/19/2010 5:58:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BLoved

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
Bob,
It's amazing that some of the "trolls" (as you label them) that are in mono-relationships and don't engage in casual BDSM are even up against you here. What's your theory or notion on that?


Acceptance here comes with a price.


It's not the foundational ideological concept of love and BDSM, that people are having an issue with. The cost/price is associated with totalitarianistic attitude. Nobody is debating Love, but rather freedom.

You are right Bob, your totalitarianist view is not tolerated. Totalitarianism threatens Freedoms and Civil Rights. Be it left wing or right wing totalitarianism.

When your Totalarianism is challenged you wave your hands up, saying how your view is not tolerated. You know what Sparky? You're right. However, this has nothing to do with the concept/values of Mono-relationships, Love and the merits of those relationships. It's your condemnation of others that not agree with it being a totalatianistic, in calling them immature, insecure and etc. In some regards you do touch upon security, because what you are expressing threatens freedoms of choice and Civil liberity and promotes hatred. You are dead right about your totalitartainistic view is not tolerated by many people.

The fact that you, call those who disagree with the extreme degree you take your belief in, polite names such a immature. Make no mistake it's in the same identical context of many swear words. Where the immature is simply a more polite way of saying "Dumb Fuckers" or etc. The context and use of your own words is clear. You are a writter, then again you already know how to use and work words. You know about context and sentence structures and the break down of words and meanings.

In regards to character assination, I'm more than happy to pick up a verbal AK-47 and pull the trigger. At least, this is all done through the use of words. There have been many people that have died in actual physical battles and wars to protect Freedom and Liberty for those in this country.






Page: <<   < prev  62 63 [64] 65 66   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625