BLoved -> RE: Beavis and Butthead Show of the Collarme boards (2/19/2010 7:07:03 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote:
Oh come now. You must have seen all the posts about "Die Thread Die" etc. That is because this thread is the trainwreck of trainwrecks Actually it illustrates very clearly the degree of maturity that advocates casual bdsm, and the degree of maturity that opposes casual bdsm. I've no complaints. quote:
quote:
I've been banned from four sites thanks to those who share your sentiments when it comes to "freedom". Did any of them advocate that you be stopped from living your life the way you like, or did they just not want to give you a platform to advocate BDSM casual player witch hunts? One need only read this thread to see why I was banned. quote:
quote:
I've no objection to rigourous debate of the issues, but let's face it, that isn't what any of you have been doing. You are seriously in denial over your debate skills I have done the best I could with what little was offered. quote:
quote:
You are trying to paint me as the next Hitler. If you could illegalize casual BDSM, would you? No. That would only force it underground, and there is enough of a problem with that as it is. I believe in education. Show people there is a better way and nine times out of ten they'll take it. If casual bdsm really is a better way, it has nothing to fear from a different point of view. If it is abusive, it has no right to survive the competition. I am willing to put all points of view on the table and let the readers decide. You are not. quote:
quote:
In other words, anyone who doesn't agree with you regarding casual bdsm is a Nazi. Anyone who would write entire books on the dangers of it, call people who do it abusers, yes, I think they are dangerous and one step away from rounding people up at dungeons and charging them with crimes like battery and assault... we have fought too long for sexual freedom to be set back now. And you don't think that is the least bit paranoid? Burned any good books lately? Ones you thought contained a dangerous message better supressed than discussed?
|
|
|
|