Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/17/2010 11:55:31 PM   
Thadius


Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline
Thanks for the quotes. My words in response to your claim stand. They are hypocrits.

_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 5:30:09 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
The Fed sees high unemployment well into 2012. It is clearly not working. This coming November the democrats will hear the phrase that sent Bush I back to Texas, 'It's the economy, stupid'..

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 5:54:24 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline
quote:

Have Obama's federal government weatherize your home for only $57,362 each

Who could forget the $5 billion in Obama administration stimulus money that was going to rapidly create nearly 90,000 green jobs across the country in these tough economic times and make so many thousands of homes all snuggy and warm and energy-efficient these very snowy days?

Well, a new report due out this morning will show the $5-billion program is so riddled with drafts that so far it's weatherized only about 9,000 homes.

Based on the initial Obama-Biden program promise that it would create 87,000 new jobs its first year, that would be about 10 jobs for each home weatherized so far. Makes for pretty crowded doorways.

ABC News reports that the General Accountability Office will declare today that the Energy Department has fallen woefully behind -- about 98.5% behind -- the 593,000 homes it initially predicted would be weatherized in the Recovery Act's very first, very chilly year.

The Energy Department is run by Steven Chu, like President Obama a Nobel Prize winner. You'll never guess what the federal government blames for the lack of significant progress.


RED tape.

Full article at: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/02/obama-stimulus-weatherization.html




_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 6:36:09 AM   
DomImus


Posts: 2004
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
To claim on camera that the stimulus bill is not working, will not work, does nothing to create jobs and then turn around and claim that the bill will create jobs in their districts, that it is working is hypocritical.

You cant be for and against something at the same time.

You have to chose one side of the argument or the other. And to try and justify that stand is makes the person look stupid.


So let me get this straight. People in every district pay taxes but only those districts whose representative voted for the stimulus package (funded by everyone's taxes) are eligible to collect any of that stimulus? Can we apply that same logic the next time taxes are raised and allow those districts whose representative voted against the tax hike to opt out and not have to pay those taxes?

I didn't think so.




_____________________________

"Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable." Sidney J. harris

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 7:08:16 AM   
UncleNasty


Posts: 1108
Joined: 3/20/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

The only problem is that not all of the stimulus money has been paid out. Republican congressmen who voted against the bill are asking for stimulus funds claiming it will do good things for their districts.


As Aaron Shock said, the bill was passed, despite his vote against it. The tab will be paid in part by his district's members, their kids and their grandkids. If the money isnt spent in his district it will be spent somewhere else. To do anything but represent his district for a share of it would be malfeasance.

How many Democrats who voted against the Bush tax cuts gave them back?



To claim on camera that the stimulus bill is not working, will not work, does nothing to create jobs and then turn around and claim that the bill will create jobs in their districts, that it is working is hypocritical.

You cant be for and against something at the same time.

You have to chose one side of the argument or the other. And to try and justify that stand is makes the person look stupid.


jlf,

That is among the kinds of communication skill sets politicians have honed to a fine edge. Politicians of ANY persuasion.

Saying one thing, yet doing another, and convincing people what was said really meant something else entirely.

Using what I refer to as a "cloud of words" to misdirect, redirect and/or confuse.

There are many such communicative devices.

Uncle Nasty

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 7:20:23 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

To try to claim that these politicians should have turned down their constituents' own money is preposterous. Its a moronic argument from the very beginning.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to UncleNasty)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 7:20:33 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
The nations unemployment rate spiked in the last week of January, up 1.4 %. Not good news for the current administration and for those out of work..

(in reply to UncleNasty)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 7:42:12 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

The only problem is that not all of the stimulus money has been paid out. Republican congressmen who voted against the bill are asking for stimulus funds claiming it will do good things for their districts.

Sure they are asking for the money, as it will help the local areas and states make ends meet; paying for the unfunded mandates that they helped impose on their own states, with the help of Dems.

I would normally see this as hypocritical, but they aren't claiming the money is going to create jobs.

They aren't?
http://www.pjstar.com/news/x814065793/Congressmen-tout-green-money



LMAO. Same old KenDoll.

From your link:

""I believe as elected representatives we have a responsibility to advocate for our districts," Schock, R-Peoria, said after a news conference at the college. "Because I don't believe that the budget is responsible doesn't mean that I'm going to abdicate my second responsibility, which is to advocate for our fair share of the funding."

Shimkus, R-Collinsville, agreed that though he's against excessive spending, there will still be spending on federal grants.

"That money is going to get spent whether I vote yes or I vote no," he said. "We need to be in there fighting.""

Exactly what I and Thadius said they said.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 7:49:03 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Thadius, the Washington Times article is Stimulus foes see value in seeking cash

Some of the quotes are:
quote:

Sen. Christopher S. Bond regularly railed against President Obama's economic stimulus plan as irresponsible spending that would drive up the national debt.
In a letter to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, Mr. Bond noted that one project applying to the USDA for stimulus money would "create jobs and ultimately spur economic opportunities."


quote:

Rep. Joe Wilson, South Carolina Republican who became famous after yelling, "You lie," during Mr. Obama's addresses to Congress in September, voted against the stimulus. Nonetheless, Mr. Wilson elbowed his way into the rush for federal stimulus cash in a letter he sent to Mr. Vilsack on behalf of a foundation seeking funding.

"We know their endeavor will provide jobs and investment in one of the poorer sections of the Congressional District," he wrote to Mr. Vilsack in the Aug. 26, 2009, letter.


quote:

On Feb. 13, 2009, Sen. Robert F. Bennett, Utah Republican, issued a statement criticizing the stimulus — but two days earlier, he privately forwarded to Mr. Vilsack a list of projects seeking stimulus money.

"I believe the addition of federal funds to these projects would maximize the stimulative effect of these projects on the local economy," he wrote.


quote:

Also facing a competitive race, Rep. Pat Tiberi, Ohio Republican, in October called the final Democratic stimulus bill "loaded with [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi's grab bag of big spending wishes" and that it "saddles future generations with mountains of debt."

He struck a different tone in a letter to Mr. Vilsack.

"While this project is intended to expand rural broadband in Alaska, I understand that the project could support businesses and jobs in communities across the country," Mr. Tiberi wrote, citing one such company in his district.


quote:

Before his vote against the stimulus, Sen. Mike Johanns, who took office last year from Nebraska, predicted that "the money would simply never reach the economy."

A secretary of agriculture under President George W. Bush, Mr. Johanns later told the Grand Island, Neb., Independent newspaper that "it would be hard for me to imagine that we are going to be creating many jobs here." Yet he saw the prospect of at least a few dozen jobs in a letter he later sent to Mr. Vilsack for a home-state project, records show.

"The proposed project would create 38 new jobs and bring broadband to eight hospitals, five colleges, 16 libraries and 161 K-12 schools," Mr. Johanns wrote.


quote:

Ranked among the most conservative members of the House by the American Conservative Union (ACU), Rep. John Linder, Georgia Republican, posted a blog item on his Web site on Oct. 21, stating that recent unemployment figures "only reinforce the fact that the $787 billion 'stimulus' signed into law eight months ago has done nothing for job growth in this country."

Two weeks earlier, Mr. Linder had sent a letter to Mr. Vilsack backing an application for stimulus money by the Elauwit Community Foundation, records show. With unemployment in Georgia topping 10 percent, "the employment opportunities created by this program would be quickly utilized," Mr. Linder wrote.


There is an article in the very conservative Wall Street Journal but I cant find a link to the story. I will continue to look for it.


Context is everything. Lets see the complete letters. Till then the writer's bias is shown in featuring this quote:

"There is a definite disconnect between the public statements and the private letters," said Thomas A. Schatz, president of the nonpartisan Citizens Against Government Waste. "It does seem inconsistent to say you're against the bill but then you want some little piece of it."

There is no inconsistency at all.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 7:56:57 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
~ Fast Accounting ~


All job numbers are skewered as they relate to the economy. They can be manipulated by either side. Here's my manipulated perspective from my one member 'Pragmatic Party'.

When the government adds an employee, at any level of government, it adds to the deficit and the problem; since they are on the expense side of the ledger. Any tax revenue generated from these employees is less than the cost. Add the perks, especially the long term obligation from benefits, and any government employee is a big expense and no benefit to the economy. Less bad but also on the expense side of the ledger are public works projects. Here's where the influence of PACS generates ROI to the corporate welfare beneficiaries. Appreciating, as in the case of food manufacturing and distribution industries, people can rationalize and support corporate welfare. There is little, if any, benefit beyond the maintenance of the infrastructure. The cost of the programs, funded by the government, add to the deficit and do not generate any revenue.

The only way to address the deficit is to create revenue sources for government that do not involve spending government funds. The government does not create jobs; however policies, taxes, and regulations are major contributors to eliminating jobs.

There is no portion of the 'stimulus' that generates private sector expansion which would create private sector jobs. The disjointed 'plan', if there is a 'plan', has created doubt and insecurity in the private sector. No investor invests from a position of doubt or insecurity. Liquid bottom feeders take advantage of the 'desperate' but any profits generated are only used for similar opportunities to profit at the expense of those who have no other choice but to sell their assets at a steep discount versus loosing them completely with no compensation.

Consider a huge, diversified, national business. If their biggest customer is a subsidiary of the same company as a whole it may be generating sales but it's not bringing in any new revenue. If the only growth in hiring is coming from the need to support that internal 'customer' it doesn't generate more revenue. Sales can go up 100% and you can need to bring on 10,000 necessary to support the increased sale. However at the end of the day when it comes to figure out the company's viability - you discover you are bankrupt.

So is the result of the stimulus program. The only 'growth' has been in the public sector. People are being hired to handle the increased need for public welfare services. At some point accounting has to be made. Unfortunately, instead of going bankrupt the government taps what it feels to be an unlimited source of revenue - tax payers. At the federal level it simply prints money and 'legalizes' the same Ponzi scheme that put Bernie Madoff in jail by signing increases to the debt ceiling at night, or during holidays, as to not have it noticed.

The bottom line: there are no jobs being 'stimulated' which address the largest problem - the deficit. There is no portion of Obama's 'stimulus' that stimulates government revenue. With all his academic theoretical knowledge I have no confidence that Obama and the people he's brought into the Administration, have the ability to change that reality. After a year, appreciating their 'good intent', I do not believe they have the desire, or ability, to appreciate that their 'theories' don't work in the real world for the 'company' they are managing into the ground - the USA.

< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 2/18/2010 8:06:06 AM >

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 8:04:50 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

~ Fast Accounting ~


All job numbers are skewered as they relate to the economy. They can be manipulated by either side. Here's my manipulated perspective from my one member 'Pragmatic Party'.

When the government adds and employee, at any level of government, it adds to the deficit and the problem; since they are on the expense side of the ledger. Any tax revenue generated from these employees is less than the cost. Add the perks, especially the long term obligation from benefits, and any government employee is a big expense and no benefit to the economy. Less bad but also on the expense side of the ledger are public works projects. Here's where the influence of PACS generates ROI to the corporate welfare beneficiaries. Appreciating, as in the case of food manufacturing and distribution industries, people can rationalize and support corporate welfare. There is little, if any, benefit beyond the maintenance of the infrastructure. The cost of the programs, funded by the government, add to the deficit and do not generate any revenue.

The only way to address the deficit is to create revenue sources for government that do not involve spending government funds. The government does not create jobs; however policies, taxes, and regulations are major contributors to eliminating jobs.

There is no portion of the 'stimulus' that generates private sector expansion which would create private sector jobs. The disjointed 'plan', if there is a 'plan', has created doubt and insecurity in the private sector. No investor invests from a position of doubt or insecurity. Liquid bottom feeders take advantage of the 'desperate' but any profits generated are only used for similar opportunities to profit at the expense of those who have no other choice but to sell their assets at a steep discount versus loosing them completely with no compensation.

Consider a huge, diversified, national business. If their biggest customer is a subsidiary of the same company as a whole it may be generating sales but it's not bringing in any new revenue. If the only growth in hiring is coming from the need to support that internal 'customer' it doesn't generate more revenue. Sales can go up 100% and you can need to bring on 10,000 necessary to support the increased sale. However at the end of the day when it comes to figure out the company's viability - you discover you are bankrupt.

So is the result of the stimulus program. The only 'growth' has been in the public sector. People are being hired to handle the increased need for public welfare services. At some point accounting has to be made. Unfortunately, instead of going bankrupt the government taps what it feels to be an unlimited source of revenue - tax payers. At the federal level it simply prints money and 'legalizes' the same Ponzi scheme that put Bernie Madoff in jail by signing increases to the debt ceiling at night, or during holidays, as to not have it noticed.

The bottom line there are no jobs being 'stimulated' which address the largest problem - the deficit. There is no portion of Obama's 'stimulus' that stimulates government revenue. With all his academic theoretical knowledge I have no confidence that Obama and the people he's brought into the Administration, have the ability to change that reality. After a year, appreciating their 'good intent', I do not believe they have the desire, or ability, to appreciate that their 'theories' don't work in the real world for the 'company' they are managing into the ground - the USA.


this

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 8:14:17 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline
ABC News can't find any economists who think the Stimulus failed


Maybe they ought to interview the ones here.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 8:28:25 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
They should just give Neil Cavuto a call.

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success - 2/18/2010 8:30:42 PM   
Thadius


Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

ABC News can't find any economists who think the Stimulus failed


Maybe they ought to interview the ones here.


Hmmm... or these 200 that think it is a failure.

quote:


BURTON ABRAMS, Univ. of Delaware
DOUGLAS ADIE, Ohio University
LEE ADKINS, Oklahoma State University
WILLIAM ALBRECHT, Univ. of Iowa
RYAN AMACHER, Univ. of Texas at Arlington
J.J.ARIAS, Georgia College & State University
HOWARD BAETJER, JR., Towson University
CHARLES BAIRD, California State University, East Bay
STACIE BECK, Univ. of Delaware
DON BELLANTE, Univ. of South Florida
JAMES BENNETT, George Mason University
BRUCE BENSON, Florida State University
SANJAI BHAGAT, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder
MARK BILS, Univ. of Rochester
ALBERTO BISIN, New York University
WALTER BLOCK, Loyola University New Orleans
CECIL BOHANON, Ball State University
MICHELE BOLDRIN,Washington University in St. Louis
DONALD BOOTH, Chapman University
MICHAEL BORDO, Rutgers University
SAMUEL BOSTAPH, Univ. of Dallas
DONALD BOUDREAUX, George Mason University
SCOTT BRADFORD, Brigham Young University
GENEVIEVE BRIAND, Eastern Washington University
IVAN BRICK, Rutgers University
GEORGE BROWER, Moravian College
PHILLIP BRYSON, Brigham Young University
JAMES BUCHANAN, Nobel laureate
RICHARD BURDEKIN, Claremont McKenna College
RICHARD BURKHAUSER, Cornell University
EDWIN T. BURTON, Univ. of Virginia
JIM BUTKIEWICZ, Univ. of Delaware
HENRY BUTLER, Northwestern University
WILLIAM BUTOS, Trinity College
PETER CALCAGNO, College of Charleston
BRYAN CAPLAN, George Mason University
ART CARDEN, Rhodes College
JAMES CARDON, Brigham Young University
DUSTIN CHAMBERS, Salisbury University
EMILY CHAMLEE-WRIGHT, Beloit College
V.V. CHARI, Univ. of Minnesota
BARRY CHISWICK, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago
LAWRENCE CIMA, John Carroll University
J.R. CLARK, Univ. of Tennessee at Chattanooga
GIAN LUCA CLEMENTI, New York University
R.MORRIS COATS, Nicholls State University
JOHN COCHRAN, Metropolitan State College at Denver
JOHN COCHRANE, Univ. of Chicago
JOHN COGAN, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
LLOYD COHEN, George Mason University
JOHN COLEMAN, Duke University
BOYD COLLIER, Tarleton State University
ROBERT COLLINGE, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio
PETER COLWELL, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
MICHAEL CONNOLLY, Univ. of Miami
LEE COPPOCK, Univ. of Virginia
MARIO CRUCINI, Vanderbilt University
CHRISTOPHER CULP, Univ. of Chicago
KIRBY CUNDIFF, Northeastern State University
ANTONY DAVIES, Duquesne University
JOHN DAWSON, Appalachian State University
A. EDWARD DAY, Univ. of Texas at Dallas
CLARENCE DEITSCH, Ball State University
ALLAN DESERPA, Arizona State University
WILLIAM DEWALD, Ohio State University
ARTHUR DIAMOND, JR., Univ. of Nebraska at Omaha
JOHN DOBRA, Univ. of Nevada, Reno
JAMES DORN, Towson University
CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS, Univ. of Michigan, Flint
FLOYD DUNCAN, Virginia Military Institute
FRANCIS EGAN, Trinity College
JOHN EGGER, Towson University
KENNETH ELZINGA, Univ. of Virginia
PAUL EVANS, Ohio State University
FRANK FALERO, California State University, Bakersfield
EUGENE FAMA, Univ. of Chicago
W. KEN FARR, Georgia College & State University
DANIEL FEENBERG, National Bureau
of Economic Research
HARTMUT FISCHER, Univ. of San Francisco
ERIC FISHER, California State Polytechnic University
FRED FOLDVARY, Santa Clara University
MURRAY FRANK, Univ. of Minnesota
PETER FRANK,Wingate University
TIMOTHY FUERST, Bowling Green State University
B. DELWORTH GARDNER, Brigham Young University
JOHN GAREN, Univ. of Kentucky
RICK GEDDES, Cornell University
AARON GELLMAN, Northwestern University
WILLIAM GERDES, Clarke College
JOSEPH GIACALONE, St. John’s University
MICHAEL GIBBS, Univ. of Chicago
OTIS GILLEY, Louisiana Tech University
STEPHAN GOHMANN, Univ. of Louisville
RODOLFO GONZALEZ, San Jose State University
RICHARD GORDON, Penn State University
PETER GORDON, Univ. of Southern California
ERNIE GOSS, Creighton University
PAUL GREGORY, Univ. of Houston
EARL GRINOLS, Baylor University
DANIEL GROPPER, Auburn University
R.W. HAFER, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
ARTHUR HALL, Univ. of Kansas
STEVE HANKE, Johns Hopkins University
STEPHEN HAPPEL, Arizona State University
RICHARD HART, Miami University
THOMAS HAZLETT, George Mason University
FRANK HEFNER, College of Charleston
SCOTT HEIN, Texas Tech University
RONALD HEINER, George Mason University
DAVID HENDERSON, Hoover Institution,
Stanford University
ROBERT HERREN, North Dakota State University
GAILEN HITE, Columbia University
STEVEN HORWITZ, St. Lawrence University
DANIEL HOUSER, George Mason University
JOHN HOWE, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia
JEFFREY HUMMEL, San Jose State University
BRUCE HUTCHINSON, Univ. of Tennessee at Chattanooga
BRIAN JACOBSEN,Wisconsin Lutheran College
SHERRY JARRELL,Wake Forest University
JASON JOHNSTON, Univ. of Pennsylvania
BOYAN JOVANOVIC, New York University
JONATHAN KARPOFF, Univ. of Washington
BARRY KEATING, Univ. of Notre Dame
NAVEEN KHANNA, Michigan State University
NICHOLAS KIEFER, Cornell University
DANIEL KLEIN, George Mason University
PAUL KOCH, Univ. of Kansas
NARAYANA KOCHERLAKOTA, Univ. of Minnesota
MAREK KOLAR, Delta College
ROGER KOPPL, Fairleigh Dickinson University
KISHORE KULKARNI, Metropolitan
State College of Denver
DEEPAK LAL, UCLA
GEORGE LANGELETT, South Dakota State University
JAMES LARRIVIERE, Spring Hill College
ROBERT LAWSON, Auburn University
JOHN LEVENDIS, Loyola University New Orleans
DAVID LEVINE,Washington University in St. Louis
PETER LEWIN, Univ. of Texas at Dallas
W. CRIS LEWIS, Utah State University
DEAN LILLARD, Cornell University
ZHENG LIU, Emory University
ALAN LOCKARD, Binghampton University
EDWARD LOPEZ, San Jose State University
JOHN R. LOTT, Jr., Univ. of Maryland
JOHN LUNN, Hope College
GLENN MACDONALD,Washington
University in St. Louis
HENRY MANNE, George Mason University
MICHAEL MARLOW, California
Polytechnic State University
DERYL MARTIN, Tennessee Tech University
DALE MATCHECK, Northwood University
JOHN MATSUSAKA, Univ. of Southern California
THOMAS MAYOR, Univ. of Houston
DEIRDRE MCCLOSKEY, University of Illinois at Chicago
JOHN MCDERMOTT, Univ. of South Carolina
JOSEPH MCGARRITY, Univ. of Central Arkansas
ROGER MEINERS, Univ. of Texas at Arlington
ALLAN MELTZER, Carnegie Mellon University
JOHN MERRIFIELD, Univ. of Texas at San Antonio
JAMES MILLER III, George Mason University
JEFFREY MIRON, Harvard University
THOMAS MOELLER, Texas Christian University
JOHN MOORHOUSE,Wake Forest University
ANDREA MORO, Vanderbilt University
ANDREW MORRISS, Univ. of Illinois
at Urbana-Champaign
MICHAEL MUNGER, Duke University
KEVIN MURPHY, Univ. of Southern California
DAVID MUSTARD, Univ. of Georgia
RICHARD MUTH, Emory University
CHARLES NELSON, Univ. of Washington
WILLIAM NISKANEN, Cato Institute
SETH NORTON, Wheaton College
LEE OHANIAN, UCLA
LYDIA ORTEGA, San Jose State University
EVAN OSBORNE, Wright State University
RANDALL PARKER, East Carolina University
ALLEN PARKMAN, Univ. of New Mexico
DONALD PARSONS, George Washington University
SAM PELTZMAN, Univ. of Chicago
TIMOTHY PERRI, Appalachian State University
MARK PERRY, Univ. of Michigan, Flint
CHRISTOPHER PHELAN, Univ. of Minnesota
GORDON PHILLIPS, Univ. of Maryland
MICHAEL PIPPENGER, Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks
TOMASZ PISKORSKI, Columbia University
BRENNAN PLATT, Brigham Young University
JOSEPH POMYKALA, Towson University
WILLIAM POOLE, Univ. of Delaware
BARRY POULSON, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder
BENJAMIN POWELL, Suffolk University
EDWARD PRESCOTT, Nobel laureate
GARY QUINLIVAN, Saint Vincent College
REZA RAMAZANI, Saint Michael’s College
ADRIANO RAMPINI, Duke University
ERIC RASMUSEN, Indiana University
MARIO RIZZO, New York University
NANCY ROBERTS, Arizona State University
RICHARD ROLL, UCLA
ROBERT ROSSANA,Wayne State University
JAMES ROUMASSET, Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa
JOHN ROWE, Univ. of South Florida
CHARLES ROWLEY, George Mason University
JUAN RUBIO-RAMIREZ, Duke University
ROY RUFFIN, Univ. of Houston
KEVIN SALYER, Univ. of California, Davis
THOMAS SAVING, Texas A&M University
PAVEL SAVOR, Univ. of Pennsylvania
RONALD SCHMIDT, Univ. of Rochester
CARLOS SEIGLIE, Rutgers University
ALAN SHAPIRO, Univ. of Southern California
WILLIAM SHUGHART II, Univ. of Mississippi
CHARLES SKIPTON, Univ. of Tampa
JAMES SMITH,Western Carolina University
VERNON SMITH, Nobel laureate
LAWRENCE SOUTHWICK, JR., Univ. at Buffalo
DEAN STANSEL, Florida Gulf Coast University
HOUSTON STOKES, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago
BRIAN STROW,Western Kentucky University
SHIRLEY SVORNY, California State
University, Northridge
JOHN TATOM, Indiana State University
WADE THOMAS, State University
of New York at Oneonta
HENRY THOMPSON, Auburn University
ALEX TOKAREV, The King’s College
EDWARD TOWER, Duke University
LEO TROY, Rutgers University
WILLIAM TRUMBULL,West Virginia University
DAVID TUERCK, Suffolk University
CHARLOTTE TWIGHT, Boise State University
KAMAL UPADHYAYA, Univ. of New Haven
CHARLES UPTON, Kent State University
T. NORMANVAN COTT, Ball State University
RICHARDVEDDER, Ohio University
RICHARDWAGNER, George Mason University
DOUGLAS M.WALKER, College of Charleston
DOUGLAS O.WALKER, Regent University
MARCWEIDENMIER, Claremont McKenna College
CHRISTOPHERWESTLEY, Jacksonville
State University
ROBERTWHAPLES,Wake Forest University
LAWRENCEWHITE, Univ. of Missouri at St. Louis
WALTERWILLIAMS, George Mason University
DOUGWILLS, Univ. of Washington Tacoma
DENNISWILSON,Western Kentucky University
GARYWOLFRAM, Hillsdale College
HUIZHONG ZHOU,Western Michigan University



_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 34
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Judging Stimulus by Job Data Reveals Success Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.110