RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 6:56:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood
Well, your own Avatar Theory (see above) would suggest that you are a tree, small plant, or possibly a small rock.

My avatar as a Rorschach...



And here I always thought of you as a beam of warm light!




Rule -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:05:36 AM)

Quite perceptive.

Rorschachs reveal. [;)]




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:06:16 AM)

It's like the X-files "the truth is out there".. and if we really knew the truth (according to what the 9-11's say is true) what would that really mean? The sudden realization that government is corrupt?




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:10:58 AM)

Provoke a responce.....hahahahahahaha




Rule -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:21:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
It's like the X-files "the truth is out there".. and if we really knew the truth (according to what the 9-11's say is true) what would that really mean? The sudden realization that government is corrupt?

The truth must never be known. If it ever came out, the USA and its allies would have to pay exorbitant damages to the countries that they attacked and / or occupied, as well as to the relatives of the innocent people who died in the towers and in the Pentagon. Exposing the truth might be considered treason to the western civilizations. (On the other hand, of course, not exposing the truth is treason to the truth.)




flcouple2009 -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:23:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood
People think RO is a deluded cunt.

RealOne is female?

I suppose there are a lot of forum participants that are not the gender that I think they are. As another example of this: it was my impression, considering your avatar, that you were female, but your remark about your balls having dropped suggest that you are male.

The gender identity issue confuses me. Perhaps I ought to ought to view most participants in these forums as genderless bots that fake being human?



OK, I'll play for a moment. 

Follow the logic here for a moment Rule.
     His name is Ebony, which I took to refer to meaning black, Wood, which I took to refer to being "male". 
The picture is of a woman kneeling before what I took as a man, a black man in particular as the arm extended is black.  The rest is assumption that since the woman is white he is either attracted to white women or just liked the picture.

Now connecting the dots it is easy too understand how people who can't comprehend something as simple as that can't understand that yes you really did see a video of a plane flying into that tower.  It did actually happen that way.




EbonyWood -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:24:12 AM)

Checks in, sees thread is now where it belongs.
 
Nice work.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:26:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009
OK, I'll play for a moment. 

Follow the logic here for a moment Rule.
     His name is Ebony, which I took to refer to meaning black, Wood, which I took to refer to being "male". 
The picture is of a woman kneeling before what I took as a man, a black man in particular as the arm extended is black.  The rest is assumption that since the woman is white he is either attracted to white women or just liked the picture.

Now connecting the dots it is easy too understand how people who can't comprehend something as simple as that can't understand that yes you really did see a video of a plane flying into that tower.  It did actually happen that way.


Funny, that's how I've always connected the same Avatar dots too... (pay attention to detail)





EbonyWood -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:27:26 AM)

Plus, flcouple, Rule has checked out my profile before, so I'm thinking lack of observational skills or a disconnection from reality.
 
Either way, same result.




Rule -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:31:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009
Follow the logic here for a moment Rule.
     His name is Ebony, which I took to refer to meaning black, Wood, which I took to refer to being "male". 
The picture is of a woman kneeling before what I took as a man, a black man in particular as the arm extended is black.  The rest is assumption that since the woman is white he is either attracted to white women or just liked the picture.

That is a good analysis, flcouple2009.

I often do not notice the extended arm, because to me it has the same color as its background. I usually confuse that arm with the root of a tree.

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009
Now connecting the dots it is easy too understand how people who can't comprehend something as simple as that can't understand that yes you really did see a video of a plane flying into that tower.  It did actually happen that way.

I do not think that the two correlate.

Yes, I really did see a video of a plane flying into that tower.  It did actually did happen that I saw that video, indeed.




Rule -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:40:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood
Plus, flcouple, Rule has checked out my profile before, so I'm thinking lack of observational skills or a disconnection from reality.

I looked at your profile again just now. I may have seen it before, but except for the main picture I did not recall anything of it. I suspect that I only looked at it to have a better view of your avatar.




pahunkboy -> RE: How to steal a [color=#FFFF00](plane)[/color] / thread (2/22/2010 7:41:16 AM)

7 never was hit by a plane and dropped in a free fall implosion- after silerstian said- pull it.




mnottertail -> RE: How to steal a [color=#FFFF00](plane)[/color] / thread (2/22/2010 7:47:31 AM)

and the significance of that is what?




EbonyWood -> RE: How to steal a [color=#FFFF00](plane)[/color] / thread (2/22/2010 7:54:30 AM)

You have a youtube link pahunk, or still banned?




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 7:57:20 AM)

The only thing that sort of freaks me out about 911, is the underside of the second plane and some videos I've watched concerning it. There's people who are not 911ist that even raise eyebrows over it. So far this is the one thing that's caused me to wonder about anything being covered up.




Rule -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 8:09:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
The only thing that sort of freaks me out about 911, is the underside of the second plane and some videos I've watched concerning it. There's people who are not 911ist that even raise eyebrows over it. So far this is the one thing that's caused me to wonder about anything being covered up.

You are probably referring to the 'pod' or the wingfairings.

There is nothing mysterious about those.

I had my own suspicions as to these, but the arguments of other people concerning the pod and wingfairings convinced me that they were red herrings.

I investigated other plane issues, only to conclude that they were red herrings as well.

Finally, as perhaps the very first person to do so - not detracting from the glory of those who independently came to the same conclusion - I concluded that there were no planes: two never took off, the other two landed safely elsewhere.




Real0ne -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 8:23:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

You must be smoking some really good shit man because I was not a party to your voting nor did I consent to abide by your little charade.



Except you participated in the poll, LIAR.
 
http://www.collarchat.com/m_2997773/mpage_3/key_chia/tm.htm#2999428
 
RealOne LIES AGAIN !!!!!!!!!
 



There is a difference between participating in the thread and voting in the poll or consenting to the abide by the outcome of said poll.

I realize that is an extremely difficult concept for some people to grasp.




Real0ne -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 8:28:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4

The only thing that sort of freaks me out about 911, is the underside of the second plane and some videos I've watched concerning it. There's people who are not 911ist that even raise eyebrows over it. So far this is the one thing that's caused me to wonder about anything being covered up.


you need to have very good skills and experience in several fields or simply have done demolitions to be able to discern what took place on that day with the buildings.   Its a great breeding ground for keyboard commandos.




Rule -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 8:29:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I realize that is an extremely difficult concept for some people to grasp.

I have similar difficulty to grasp that EbonyWood is male. I often suppose that she is female, I think because of the prominent female in her avatar. Perhaps also because another Ebony(x) nick that I am familiar with is a genuine female.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Patriots on How To Destroy the 9/11 Truthers (2/22/2010 8:31:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
The only thing that sort of freaks me out about 911, is the underside of the second plane and some videos I've watched concerning it. There's people who are not 911ist that even raise eyebrows over it. So far this is the one thing that's caused me to wonder about anything being covered up.

You are probably referring to the 'pod' or the wingfairings.

There is nothing mysterious about those.

I had my own suspicions as to these, but the arguments of other people concerning the pod and wingfairings convinced me that they were red herrings.

I investigated other plane issues, only to conclude that they were red herrings as well.

Finally, as perhaps the very first person to do so - not detracting from the glory of those who independently came to the same conclusion - I concluded that there were no planes: two never took off, the other two landed safely elsewhere.


Thanks for the link. I read it and yeah.. I'm glad I've not been loosing sleep over this madness. If I did I'd probally loose my mind and start covering up my head with tin foil so the government devices could not read my mind.










Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875