eyesopened
Posts: 2798
Joined: 6/12/2006 From: Tampa, FL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cadenas quote:
ORIGINAL: eyesopened A company will lay off a thousand workers, those salaries cut benefit the bottom line. This allows the company manangement to appear to have increased the earnings and they can get big fat bonuses. In other words they robbed from the poor and gave to the rich. This kind of behavior is rewarded on Wall Street. It is so wrong on such a basic level that I don't understand how anyone can be okay with this. Reality is actually far more complicated. Take the example of Apple from the original post, for instance. Yes, it's true that originally, Apple computers were assembled in Silicon Valley. It's also true that originally, they cost several thousand dollars. So let's look at what the world would look like if outsourcing to China hadn't happened (and contrary to the article's assertion, outsourcing of the higher-skilled programming and engineering jobs is rampant, to India). It wouldn't just be "more Americans employed." It would also be "the cost of living is dramatically higher" and "the standard of living is dramatically lower". Now I'm not saying that's a bad thing. In fact, I believe that we'd be better off without the absurdly high-flying economy of the last 20 or so years. What we are experiencing as depression right now is nothing but a return to normal. Incidentally, another consequence of this fictitious "no outsourcing" world would have been dramatically lower housing cost. One of the main reasons housing is so expensive is that is one of the few goods whose manufacture can't be outsourced. Domestic labor is more expensive. If everything was manufactured domestically, that extra cost would be spread across all goods. Reality is more complicated. The reality is that out-sourcing and off-shore manufacturing is not giving consumers the overall cost savings one would expect. In other words, yes goods would cost more, but in reality, not a lot more. This from Business Week 2007 article: "Paul B. Toms Jr., CEO of publicly traded Hooker Furniture Corp., (HOFT ) recently closed his company's last remaining domestic wood-furniture manufacturing plant, in Martinsville, Va. It was the culmination of a wrenching process that started in 2000, when Hooker still made the vast majority of its products in the U.S. Toms didn't want to go overseas, he says, but he couldn't pass up the 20% to 25% savings to be gleaned from manufacturing there. The lure ofoffshoring works the same way for large companies. Byrne of Accenture is working with a "major transportation equipment company" that's planning to offshore more than half of its parts procurement over the next few years. Most of it will go to China. "We're talking about 30% to 40% cost reductions," says Byrne. Yet no matter how hard you look, you can't find any trace of the cost savings from offshoring in the import price statistics. The furniture industry's experience is particularly telling. Despite the surge of low-priced chairs, tables, and similar products from China, the BLS is reporting that the import price of furniture has actually risen 6.7% since 2003. The numbers for Chinese imports as a whole are equally out of step with reality. Over the past three years, total imports have climbed by 89%, as U.S.-based companies have rushed to take advantage of the enormous cost advantages. Yet over the same period, the import price index for goods coming out of China has declined a mere 2.3%. More current data also shows that the costs for imported goods has not decreased nor is cost savings really being seen at the check-out stand. The idea that off-shoring gives consumers more buying power is false. Computer prices dropped due to better and cheaper technology. There is nothing to suggest computers would still cost thousands of dollars were they to be manufactured in the US. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ximpim.nr0.htm
< Message edited by eyesopened -- 2/23/2010 5:15:53 AM >
_____________________________
Proudly owned by InkedMaster. He is the one i obey, serve, honor and love. No one is honored for what they've received. Honor is the reward for what has been given.
|