Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/23/2010 3:26:00 AM   
eyesopened


Posts: 2798
Joined: 6/12/2006
From: Tampa, FL
Status: offline
I don't know how we cure greed and selfishness.  It would appear to me that these are the essential elements that need to be changed in order for anything at all to change.  My opinion is that even the ever dwindling middle class looks for short term gains without calculating long-term costs.  We live in a selfish society who cares nothing for their neighbor.  Without a sense of community even on a basic and individual level, how can we ever expect it on a national level.

It doesn't bother me that the rich get richer.  It's the how this happens that bothers me.  Getting rich because you worked harder or smarter or built a better mousetrap is a wonderful thing.  Getting rich because you stole it is heinous.

A company will lay off a thousand workers, those salaries cut benefit the bottom line. This allows the company manangement to appear to have increased the earnings and they can get big fat bonuses.  In other words they robbed from the poor and gave to the rich.  This kind of behavior is rewarded on Wall Street.  It is so wrong on such a basic level that I don't understand how anyone can be okay with this.

What do we do?   I know I'm probably really stupid but it seems we have a lot of intelligent people on these message boards and no one is suggesting solutions, real, workable, solutions that we can implement.  Being miserable and starting thread after thread of sadness, anger and magical thinking, obviously isn't working.

So..... what do we DO?

_____________________________

Proudly owned by InkedMaster. He is the one i obey, serve, honor and love.

No one is honored for what they've received. Honor is the reward for what has been given.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/23/2010 3:46:40 AM   
Servant4Queen


Posts: 179
Joined: 8/18/2008
Status: offline

quote:

A company will lay off a thousand workers, those salaries cut benefit the bottom line. This allows the company manangement to appear to have increased the earnings and they can get big fat bonuses. In other words they robbed from the poor and gave to the rich. This kind of behavior is rewarded on Wall Street. It is so wrong on such a basic level that I don't understand how anyone can be okay with this.


YES! This is the one thing that bothers me the most. Layoff workers and all that extra money goes right to the top. How many jobs could be saved instead of some CEO or stcokholder getting 3 million in bonuses and salary had they only made 2 million?

(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/23/2010 4:08:58 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened
A company will lay off a thousand workers, those salaries cut benefit the bottom line. This allows the company manangement to appear to have increased the earnings and they can get big fat bonuses.  In other words they robbed from the poor and gave to the rich.  This kind of behavior is rewarded on Wall Street.  It is so wrong on such a basic level that I don't understand how anyone can be okay with this.


Reality is actually far more complicated. Take the example of Apple from the original post, for instance. Yes, it's true that originally, Apple computers were assembled in Silicon Valley. It's also true that originally, they cost several thousand dollars.

So let's look at what the world would look like if outsourcing to China hadn't happened (and contrary to the article's assertion, outsourcing of the higher-skilled programming and engineering jobs is rampant, to India). It wouldn't just be "more Americans employed." It would also be "the cost of living is dramatically higher" and "the standard of living is dramatically lower".

Now I'm not saying that's a bad thing. In fact, I believe that we'd be better off without the absurdly high-flying economy of the last 20 or so years. What we are experiencing as depression right now is nothing but a return to normal.

Incidentally, another consequence of this fictitious "no outsourcing" world would have been dramatically lower housing cost. One of the main reasons housing is so expensive is that is one of the few goods whose manufacture can't be outsourced. Domestic labor is more expensive. If everything was manufactured domestically, that extra cost would be spread across all goods.


(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/23/2010 4:39:48 AM   
eyesopened


Posts: 2798
Joined: 6/12/2006
From: Tampa, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cadenas

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened
A company will lay off a thousand workers, those salaries cut benefit the bottom line. This allows the company manangement to appear to have increased the earnings and they can get big fat bonuses.  In other words they robbed from the poor and gave to the rich.  This kind of behavior is rewarded on Wall Street.  It is so wrong on such a basic level that I don't understand how anyone can be okay with this.


Reality is actually far more complicated. Take the example of Apple from the original post, for instance. Yes, it's true that originally, Apple computers were assembled in Silicon Valley. It's also true that originally, they cost several thousand dollars.

So let's look at what the world would look like if outsourcing to China hadn't happened (and contrary to the article's assertion, outsourcing of the higher-skilled programming and engineering jobs is rampant, to India). It wouldn't just be "more Americans employed." It would also be "the cost of living is dramatically higher" and "the standard of living is dramatically lower".

Now I'm not saying that's a bad thing. In fact, I believe that we'd be better off without the absurdly high-flying economy of the last 20 or so years. What we are experiencing as depression right now is nothing but a return to normal.

Incidentally, another consequence of this fictitious "no outsourcing" world would have been dramatically lower housing cost. One of the main reasons housing is so expensive is that is one of the few goods whose manufacture can't be outsourced. Domestic labor is more expensive. If everything was manufactured domestically, that extra cost would be spread across all goods.




Reality is more complicated.  The reality is that out-sourcing and off-shore manufacturing is not giving consumers the overall cost savings one would expect.  In other words, yes goods would cost more, but in reality, not a lot more.

This from Business Week 2007 article:

"Paul B. Toms Jr., CEO of publicly traded Hooker Furniture Corp., (HOFT ) recently closed his company's last remaining domestic wood-furniture manufacturing plant, in Martinsville, Va. It was the culmination of a wrenching process that started in 2000, when Hooker still made the vast majority of its products in the U.S. Toms didn't want to go overseas, he says, but he couldn't pass up the 20% to 25% savings to be gleaned from manufacturing there.

The lure ofoffshoring works the same way for large companies. Byrne of Accenture is working with a "major transportation equipment company" that's planning to offshore more than half of its parts procurement over the next few years. Most of it will go to China. "We're talking about 30% to 40% cost reductions," says Byrne.

Yet no matter how hard you look, you can't find any trace of the cost savings from offshoring in the import price statistics. The furniture industry's experience is particularly telling. Despite the surge of low-priced chairs, tables, and similar products from China, the BLS is reporting that the import price of furniture has actually risen 6.7% since 2003.

The numbers for Chinese imports as a whole are equally out of step with reality. Over the past three years, total imports have climbed by 89%, as U.S.-based companies have rushed to take advantage of the enormous cost advantages. Yet over the same period, the import price index for goods coming out of China has declined a mere 2.3%.

 
More current data also shows that the costs for imported goods has not decreased nor is cost savings really being seen at the check-out stand.  The idea that off-shoring gives consumers more buying power is false.  Computer prices dropped due to better and cheaper technology.  There is nothing to suggest computers would still cost thousands of dollars were they to be manufactured in the US.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ximpim.nr0.htm

< Message edited by eyesopened -- 2/23/2010 5:15:53 AM >


_____________________________

Proudly owned by InkedMaster. He is the one i obey, serve, honor and love.

No one is honored for what they've received. Honor is the reward for what has been given.

(in reply to cadenas)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/23/2010 5:09:52 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

The lure ofoffshoring works the same way for large companies. Byrne of Accenture is working with a "major transportation equipment company" that's planning to offshore more than half of its parts procurement over the next few years. Most of it will go to China. "We're talking about 30% to 40% cost reductions," says Byrne.

Yet no matter how hard you look, you can't find any trace of the cost savings from offshoring in the import price statistics. The furniture industry's experience is particularly telling. Despite the surge of low-priced chairs, tables, and similar products from China, the BLS is reporting that the import price of furniture has actually risen 6.7% since 2003.

The numbers for Chinese imports as a whole are equally out of step with reality. Over the past three years, total imports have climbed by 89%, as U.S.-based companies have rushed to take advantage of the enormous cost advantages. Yet over the same period, the import price index for goods coming out of China has declined a mere 2.3%.




I'm not quite sure I quite follow. Of course the cost savings wouldn't show up in the import price statistics, since they don't compare American-made goods with Chinese goods in the first place. Apparently, they compare Chinese goods in 2003 with Chinese goods in 2008. So one would not expect any cost savings.

Or am I missing something?

BTW, just to be clear: I think in the end we are on the same side of the debate. I do believe the "cost savings" are real, but I also think that they come at too high a price (and they aren't sustainable as incomes rise in China).


(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/23/2010 5:52:42 AM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
"o..... what do we DO?"

Here's my prescription-

1) Change the tax structure. The income maldistribution is based on taxes- specifically social security/medicare/medicaid because these are regressive taxes- the burden falls most heavily on the poor and middle class. For people making around $40k or so- the income tax is less money than SS/Medicare/Medicaid. I They're capped at ~ 17% for up to $100k in income. This means that the middle class and the poor pick up most of this burden. I know people like these programs- but in their current state, they've been a disaster. Doesn't mean that it's acceptable to throw retirees on the street though. It's only the rich folks that really squawk about income tax, and clearly, they pay too small a portion, so their squawks are unrelated to reality- it's just greed. Rich folks also give a smaller percentage of their income to charity, so the reality is that these are the people who are greedy- and they're going to bellyache no matter what. Quit listening....

2) Level the playing field on Chinese goods. Fine the companies and the importers that are bringing in Chinese goods that have lead in their paint in toys, expose kids to solvents (seen the plastic balloons sold to youngsters?) and have melamine in food supplies. The buck has to stop with the US companies, since enforcement in China is a sick joke.

3) Make Uncle Sam shop smarter. He's the largest customer on the planet, and he's been buying junk. Time to set some ambitious goals in terms of power generation, space exploration, and health care. Time to quit buying stupid weapons systems that either don't work- or worse, are obsolete and useless. What grew the US economy was the investment in R + D- not banking. Also- get rid of COTS (commercial off the shelf technology) for the military- and make sure that vital materials and products are produced domestically.

4) Quit importing foreign oil- go to domestic sources of energy that don't involve digging stuff out of the ground. We can shift to natural gas for the short term if needed.

How's that?

Sam

(in reply to cadenas)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/23/2010 10:42:03 AM   
Fellow


Posts: 1486
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
It is not that the government does not know what the problems are and how to fix them. The problem is that US is a failed state on crash course and the way the power is structured does not allow it to be stopped or turned around. The plutocrats fight every little or big change that cuts into their income and privileges.

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/24/2010 6:58:25 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

"o..... what do we DO?"

Here's my prescription-

1) Change the tax structure.

2) Level the playing field on Chinese goods. Fine the companies and the importers that are bringing in Chinese goods that have lead in their paint in toys, expose kids to solvents (seen the plastic balloons sold to youngsters?) and have melamine in food supplies. The buck has to stop with the US companies, since enforcement in China is a sick joke.

3) Make Uncle Sam shop smarter. He's the largest customer on the planet, and he's been buying junk. Time to set some ambitious goals in terms of power generation, space exploration, and health care. Time to quit buying stupid weapons systems that either don't work- or worse, are obsolete and useless. What grew the US economy was the investment in R + D- not banking. Also- get rid of COTS (commercial off the shelf technology) for the military- and make sure that vital materials and products are produced domestically.

4) Quit importing foreign oil- go to domestic sources of energy that don't involve digging stuff out of the ground. We can shift to natural gas for the short term if needed.

How's that?

Sam


1) I agree

2) These types of fines are already reality, and have been well before the lead infestation etc. happened. The other component (import tariffs to raise the price of Chinese goods) isn't possible. For one, it would be a violation of any number of treaties. More importantly, it would backfire. Last time we tried something like that (with steel around 2003, I believe), it ended in a trade war. Europeans slapped an equal amount of tariffs on US products (they chose primarily Florida oranges, but they could have just as easily targeted Boeing airplanes or Microsoft software).

Frankly, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea anyway.

3) We have already done that - to the howling protests of "taxpayer advocates". For instance, government projects must pay the prevailing wage (i.e., union wage). Conservatives want to undo that with an ordinance they call "Fair Competition" here in San Diego

4) That has to be a long-term project. I agree with that goal.


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/24/2010 9:49:40 AM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
"2) These types of fines are already reality, and have been well before the lead infestation etc. happened. The other component (import tariffs to raise the price of Chinese goods) isn't possible. For one, it would be a violation of any number of treaties. More importantly, it would backfire. Last time we tried something like that (with steel around 2003, I believe), it ended in a trade war. Europeans slapped an equal amount of tariffs on US products (they chose primarily Florida oranges, but they could have just as easily targeted Boeing airplanes or Microsoft software).

Frankly, I'm not sure that it would be a good idea anyway. "

Sorry- but we've GOT to. And I suspect that the Europeans might be on our side by now. Here's the problem-

The US system of capitalism hinges upon intellectual property- patents are a key role. Prior economies did not have this type of protection, and the small inventor was wiped out by firms or individuals with deeper pockets. The inventor would take his invention to the large manufacturer- get promised the world- and wind up with pennies while the fat cat got fatter. Jefferson saw this as a problem- it didn't reward the person with the brains- it rewarded the guy with the money.

The drive to manufacture in China has ridden roughshod over intellectual property. Patents in China are a sick joke. The only person I've heard tell me any different was a lovely Chinese woman who appeared very sincere, and drove off in an expensive BMW- and I'm not sure she was even 30. This is not a problem that's limited to China, when we helped rebuild Japan's economy post WWII, the same thing happened. As Japan's economy has matured, patent protection has become increasingly important, but I still remember the 80s when the Japanese firms were creaming US firms and IP was a sick joke to the Japanese. Now the Chinese are doing to the Japanese what the Japanese did to us, but the Chinese are clobbering us as well- and they have 5 TIMES our population! We survived the Japanese economic attack because our economy is larger, but we don't have the resources to beat China at the bigger is better game. We have to be smarter.

Yes, I know all the economic theorems about how it's impossible to erect trade barriers- but we have to protect our IP or we're done. I will also point out that a big chunk of the drive to mfg in China is thanks to our @#$%@#$% bankers who convinced investors that their "financial instruments" (which seem to consist of a very large, hard, shlong inserted into an anal aperture and rotated forcefully) would yield better returns than investments in manufacture. This forced manufacturers to seek cheaper methods offshore, even though it meant throwing away decades of IP. And has other posters have pointed out- the benefits to consumers have been negligible at best. Furniture's not the only example I can think of- look at sneakers. When was the last time that a mfg that moved to China actually dropped prices? Seems to me that they've just increased their temporary profits- until the Chinese figure out that all the US firms are is a brand, and that they can do better on their own.

Sam

(in reply to cadenas)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/24/2010 6:52:31 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

quote:

Yes.

What's the problem with that?



No problems if you belong to a rich class.



Anyone can.

(Be very thankful for the "rich". There are far fewer of them than the other classes...and they pay well over 90% of the federal taxes. God Bless the wealthy).

< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 2/24/2010 6:53:49 PM >

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/24/2010 6:55:59 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

I don't know how we cure greed and selfishness.  It would appear to me that these are the essential elements that need to be changed in order for anything at all to change.  My opinion is that even the ever dwindling middle class looks for short term gains without calculating long-term costs.  We live in a selfish society who cares nothing for their neighbor.  Without a sense of community even on a basic and individual level, how can we ever expect it on a national level.

It doesn't bother me that the rich get richer.  It's the how this happens that bothers me.  Getting rich because you worked harder or smarter or built a better mousetrap is a wonderful thing.  Getting rich because you stole it is heinous.

A company will lay off a thousand workers, those salaries cut benefit the bottom line. This allows the company manangement to appear to have increased the earnings and they can get big fat bonuses.  In other words they robbed from the poor and gave to the rich.  This kind of behavior is rewarded on Wall Street.  It is so wrong on such a basic level that I don't understand how anyone can be okay with this.

What do we do?   I know I'm probably really stupid but it seems we have a lot of intelligent people on these message boards and no one is suggesting solutions, real, workable, solutions that we can implement.  Being miserable and starting thread after thread of sadness, anger and magical thinking, obviously isn't working.

So..... what do we DO?


Become wealthy.

(It's fairly easy).

(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/24/2010 6:57:55 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Servant4Queen


quote:

A company will lay off a thousand workers, those salaries cut benefit the bottom line. This allows the company manangement to appear to have increased the earnings and they can get big fat bonuses. In other words they robbed from the poor and gave to the rich. This kind of behavior is rewarded on Wall Street. It is so wrong on such a basic level that I don't understand how anyone can be okay with this.


YES! This is the one thing that bothers me the most. Layoff workers and all that extra money goes right to the top. How many jobs could be saved instead of some CEO or stockholder getting 3 million in bonuses and salary had they only made 2 million?


Maybe 2 at best.

(in reply to Servant4Queen)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes - 2/24/2010 7:14:15 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie
(Be very thankful for the "rich". There are far fewer of them than the other classes...and they pay well over 90% of the federal taxes. God Bless the Mister Scrooge!).


Your groveling is admirable, but haven't you ever, just once, wanted to stand up and look your Overlords in the eye like a man?

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 33
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Are the Rich Getting Richer? The Data Say Yes Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078