Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 9:06:08 AM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JonnieBoy
Hey Eeeengleeesh ... You missed the point ... tried picking on the wrong guy and made yourself look a twat (so I'm told) Par for the course, of course SL4.

There is no such thing as the wrong guy.

When you made that big thing about leaving for good and then came back after a couple of months, now that would be my definition of making yourself look like a twat. When you started some secretive fight with MoGa, and broadcast it to the rest of the forum (to those people that didn't have a stake in it) now that also I would say made you look twat like. You judging others as looking pathetic is quite rich coming from you sir. So I'm told


< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 2/27/2010 9:30:27 AM >

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to JonnieBoy)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 9:42:34 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I want to thank those who question #7.

You are true patriots.  We can not let this fraud stand.



Hunk, some people are physics bankrupt.  Its amazing how many people come out here and call themselves engineers when they dont know which side of a calculator to use.

This is what should have happened to #2, but thats the real world!  Cant have that!











That is alot more realistic then the free fall we seen when 7 was imploded.  and no plane what-s0-ever hit that building.




Well the laws of physics only apply (and work),  in other countries!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 9:46:32 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		where is the airplane in this picture or dont they fly them in other countries where the laws of physics hold true, as they do in the united states.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 9:50:20 AM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		Real0ne thinks the partial collapse of one floor, shown in the image, is what the failure mechanism of building seven should have looked like. What he needs to ask himself is: how is vibration and falling debris from the adjacent towers only going to affect one floor of building seven??????

< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 2/27/2010 9:54:01 AM >

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 9:53:28 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		the buildings are too close together in that picture. building 7 couldnt have went to mexico without an airplane.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 10:32:25 AM   
PenOnBeadedChain


Posts: 58
Joined: 8/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex
As someone else pointed out, its amazing how suddenly insurance adjusters, office managers, mortgage brokers, and tv repairmen suddenly turn into chemists, metallugists, physicists and structural engineers, and speak confidently and with complete authority about crap that they had never even heard of until 3 days ago.


That was me, on one of the global warming threads. And yes, it applies equally here as well. I think it speaks to a certain naivete about education that some people have. Armed with knowledge garnered from watching a youtube video, listening to a few agenda-soaked, half-the-truth talk radio shows and in jealous possession of a handful of bookmarks from slanted political blogs, the person in question has just duplicated years of arduous study in a sophisticated field in a shocking four days of part-time effort. They then venture forth bravely, flaunting their new self-conferred honorary doctorate in climatology (or structural dynamics) for all to marvel at (in the way that an abnormal psychologist gapes eagerly at a new case study).

I'm chagrinned to say it's disproportionately a male thing. We are brought up to demonstrate our conquest of the natural and manmade world (it's one means for attracting sexual mates who will help perpetuate our genes) by spouting infinite, wide-ranging encyclopedic knowledge on topics from the trivial to the critical. It's a sign of maturity and enlightenment when we can finally surrender to reality and say with humility, "sorry, I don't know fucking squat about that subject, and it would be pointless of me to comment."

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 10:35:29 AM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		It's the land of wiki, wiki, wild, wild, pedia.

We can do anything since the interweb, even brain surgery.

< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 2/27/2010 10:36:28 AM >

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to PenOnBeadedChain)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 10:38:37 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

the whole bases was to invade Iraq..   and supposedly we were going to "bring the troops home".
why would anyone trust much the govt official line?

the govt lies and kills for big corporations... and the very people who don't want to face it are being robbed of their retirement.




the US IS A CORPORATION!

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3089415




No, it isnt. That was debunked years ago. At least keep up to date with your asinine theories.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 10:51:39 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

the whole bases was to invade Iraq..   and supposedly we were going to "bring the troops home".
why would anyone trust much the govt official line?

the govt lies and kills for big corporations... and the very people who don't want to face it are being robbed of their retirement.




the US IS A CORPORATION!

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3089415




No, it isnt. That was debunked years ago. At least keep up to date with your asinine theories.



yeh we know!

Everything you wish were not rtue was deunked years ago!  

Where they fuck do these people come from eh?

TITLE 28 > PART VI > CHAPTER 176 > SUBCHAPTER A > § 3002

§ 3002. Definitions
(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; o

r  (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

(16) “United States marshal” means a United States marshal, a deputy marshal, or an official of the United States Marshals Service designated under


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 10:58:17 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PenOnBeadedChain

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex
As someone else pointed out, its amazing how suddenly insurance adjusters, office managers, mortgage brokers, and tv repairmen suddenly turn into chemists, metallugists, physicists and structural engineers, and speak confidently and with complete authority about crap that they had never even heard of until 3 days ago.


That was me, on one of the global warming threads. And yes, it applies equally here as well. I think it speaks to a certain naivete about education that some people have. Armed with knowledge garnered from watching a youtube video, listening to a few agenda-soaked, half-the-truth talk radio shows and in jealous possession of a handful of bookmarks from slanted political blogs, the person in question has just duplicated years of arduous study in a sophisticated field in a shocking four days of part-time effort. They then venture forth bravely, flaunting their new self-conferred honorary doctorate in climatology (or structural dynamics) for all to marvel at (in the way that an abnormal psychologist gapes eagerly at a new case study).

I'm chagrinned to say it's disproportionately a male thing. We are brought up to demonstrate our conquest of the natural and manmade world (it's one means for attracting sexual mates who will help perpetuate our genes) by spouting infinite, wide-ranging encyclopedic knowledge on topics from the trivial to the critical. It's a sign of maturity and enlightenment when we can finally surrender to reality and say with humility, "sorry, I don't know fucking squat about that subject, and it would be pointless of me to comment."




So how are you doing on dem dar WMD's in iraq?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfuBREMXxts











_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to PenOnBeadedChain)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 11:01:50 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I want to thank those who question #7.

You are true patriots.  We can not let this fraud stand.



Hunk, some people are physics bankrupt.  Its amazing how many people come out here and call themselves engineers when they dont know which side of a calculator to use.

This is what should have happened to #2, but thats the real world!  Cant have that!











That is alot more realistic then the free fall we seen when 7 was imploded.  and no plane what-s0-ever hit that building.




Well the laws of physics only apply (and work),  in other countries!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!



where is the airplane in this picture or dont they fly them in other countries where the laws of physics hold true, as they do in the united states.



Wheres the BIGBODAFUCKNBOOM?






Gotta love these crystal clear fuckign pictures! 






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 2/27/2010 11:03:19 AM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 11:03:59 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Ja, exactly ----- so how the fuck are those pictures related in even the most tenuous way?

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/27/2010 11:04:46 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 11:15:43 AM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		He thinks all that grey shit is evidence of an explosion, forgive him he has never conducted an unconfined triaxial test, so he don't know how stupid the above remarks make him look.

< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 2/27/2010 11:17:05 AM >

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 11:22:34 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Ja, exactly ----- so how the fuck are those pictures related in even the most tenuous way?






BABABABABABABOMBS





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 11:35:52 AM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		These images are so vague, are we supposed to look at that steelwork crucifix and see the truth?

Do you want to see an image of the contents of the skip next door? I'm sure it relates to 911 some way or other.


< Message edited by SL4V3M4YB3 -- 2/27/2010 11:36:19 AM >

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 11:44:02 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

These images are so vague, are we supposed to look at that steelwork crucifix and see the truth?

Do you want to see an image of the contents of the skip next door? I'm sure it relates to 911 some way or other.





I agree!  They dont have NIST telling you WHAT TO THINK!

BBWWHAHAHAHAHA

Proves beyond a shadow of a doubt you are out of your league and why posting evidence for people who are out of their league is a waste of time.

I put that up for the benefit of those who understand what they see.   NOT what NIST tells them to see.

Cheers!






_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 11:51:19 AM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline 		You may as well give up and go home then, you should be able to convince the most badly educated otherwise you'll have no chance with anyone else.

Why don't you explain the image for me, you know for example when you read a report the figures aren't just splodged in for prettiness, they actually have text underneath detailing what the author thinks it shows. You is all presentation no content.


_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 12:10:03 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		Nah... I would rather you explain why there is no black charring from the fire and where the hell did all the insulation go?

You know dont you?   That shit is on there so well you need to literally chisel it off.  Since this piece was obviously blown free of the falling mass, where the fuck did the insulation go?

BIGGABDDAFOKNBOOM!!!!!!


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SL4V3M4YB3)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 12:16:11 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		then they criminally shipped all the wreckage out with in short time span and melted it all down.  awfully convenient for the insurance fraud- which we bailed out AIG , AIG will need another bail out.   Nice of youns to give up your retirement for the NWO.  Very nice of you all.  

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 2/27/2010 12:21:06 PM   
SL4V3M4YB3


Posts: 3506
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Nah... I would rather you explain why there is no black charring from the fire and where the hell did all the insulation go?

You know dont you? That shit is on there so well you need to literally chisel it off. Since this piece was obviously blown free of the falling mass, where the fuck did the insulation go?

BIGGABDDAFOKNBOOM!!!!!!


Depends on the type but if it was the spray on cementitious type then I suggest that it's rather brittle and crumbled off as the steel section deformed within it. You can actually see some remains on the top of the flange of that section. Also Real0ne you have to consider that the fire was localised and the collapse wasn't. i.e. was this section in a location exposed to the fire? The fire caused local weakness but the ultimate collapse was due to a cascading effect of floors above falling onto floors below. You know that whole (F = ma) thing where the F increases the greater the acceleration is. Getting run over by heavy plant at low speeds is just as deadly as getting hit by light cars at high speeds. The floors were not designed to withstand the impact loading of the floors falling from above i.e. once the steel (at the location of the fire) could no longer support the load.

Simples

_____________________________

Memory Lane...been there done that.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109