Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 7:44:42 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

thats your problem your grasp of even the simplest of phsics principles is non-extant.

How does conservation of energy conclude that floors cannot be left standing?

And I do not disagree that paper holding up steel is fascinating shit, but it has nothing to do with the collapse of the WTC in any way shape or form. While it exhibits simple physics, it does not have proprtion, weight distribution, fire, planes (and the list goes on and on) orany of the other inputs ..... as a cartoon of wiley coyote getting up from a fall off a cliff is a cartoon and not realistic


You are an agent for Goldman Sachs.



(one with a 3 inch penis!)  Apha male=- HA!!!

Makes a note- subject lacks basic reasoning skills.

And as such- you are an accessory the the insurance fraud- which burdens the taxpayer!!!  _stomp!

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 321
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 7:54:24 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Hunkie, all other matters notwithstanding my penis is big enough to satisfy me.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 322
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 8:08:58 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

thats your problem your grasp of even the simplest of phsics principles is non-extant.

How does conservation of energy conclude that floors cannot be left standing?

And I do not disagree that paper holding up steel is fascinating shit, but it has nothing to do with the collapse of the WTC in any way shape or form.

It holds up the steel in a collapse that is greatly exaggerated by comparison to the wtc to prove to people like yourself how foolish your postion is.


While it exhibits simple physics, it does not have proprtion, weight distribution, fire, planes (and the list goes on and on) orany of the other inputs ..... as a cartoon of wiley coyote getting up from a fall off a cliff is a cartoon and not realistic

well unless you are ready to claim that building design gets weaker as you get near ground level you have a serious fucking problem with that ron.




ron let me help you through these rough times.   I realize from your posts physics is not your well lets just say strong suit.

That and you wonderful talent for continually avoidance of the issues when getting your ass kicked around.

So I will try to keep this really fucking simple for you.

the reason the washer demonstration is valid and precisely demonstrates what "should" have happened is because it shows precisely the physics involved after the demolition collpase occurred.

That means that what triggers the collapse is irrelevant once a collapse is set in motion the trigger(s) no longer is part of the equation.

Not only is notion of global failure (that means simultaneous failure or all vertical columns), completely absurd the notion it can fall into the strongest line of resistance, (that means straight down),  is a case of absolute physics understanding bankruptcy or fraud.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbauH-mvmDw




But then for those like yourself who are clueless zeros on a scale of 1 - 2, about physics, here is a building where they demo it and the top 15 floors fall 5 stories and it does what should have happened with the wtc.

enjoy


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 323
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 8:09:14 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 324
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 8:13:36 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

You are an agent for Goldman Sachs.


And as such- you are an accessory the the insurance fraud- which burdens the taxpayer!!!  _stomp!


Hunk check this last video!  These guys are complete hung no matter which way they fucking squirm because we got the goods that even complete retards can now see.

Remember 50% of america is lucky they have the smarts to hold a job at Mickey D's and that is the crowd these guys want to appeal too since they are the first ones to pick up a gun.

That is why these arguments always are approached from the retard level from those who purport to agree with the government.

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/6/2010 8:14:48 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 325
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 8:22:54 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule




these guys are yesterdays news!

Hell even if you had 1 man on each column with huge cutting torches you couldnt time it close enough to get a "global" straight down collapse.




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 326
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 8:27:22 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
I agree.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 327
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 8:39:55 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
again, none you are full of shit, no, I have repeatedly said that the lower floors were heavier construction, and you have ducked the conservation of energy reference, and the columns failing with some 100 floors dropping on them is not paper and washers.

and again, there is nothing that washers and paper show. there is no proportion there is no scale in weight, structure torsion, tension, nothing...........

if I take a sheet of wet toilet paper and drop lead blocks thru it, it will fall to the floor......ergo id est, I have proven that your washer video is a fake.....just as reasonable.

regarding your other video of the demolition and the tower tipping over, it was done from the base down, and was nothing like the wtc collapse, of which both videos prove my point entirely.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 328
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 8:57:08 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

again, none you are full of shit, no, I have repeatedly said that the lower floors were heavier construction, and you have ducked the conservation of energy reference, and the columns failing with some 100 floors dropping on them is not paper and washers.

and again, there is nothing that washers and paper show. there is no proportion there is no scale in weight, structure torsion, tension, nothing...........

if I take a sheet of wet toilet paper and drop lead blocks thru it, it will fall to the floor......ergo id est, I have proven that your washer video is a fake.....just as reasonable.

regarding your other video of the demolition and the tower tipping over, it was done from the base down, and was nothing like the wtc collapse, of which both videos prove my point entirely.





you really should have stopped before removing any doubt what so ever that you are completely bankrupt in the physics department.

Like other bankrupt conspiracy theorists trying to support the 19 hijacker conspiracy theory you just made a total fool of yourself when the axe of directly applicable evidence is planted between your eyes and you still dont get it.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 329
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 9:03:27 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
you havent said shit proved shit or demonstrated shit.

notice that there are 3 people here ooohing and ahhing (including yourself in that number) the rest have clearly demonstrated that you dont know a thing, havent shown a thing, and havent done other than parrot whackos, and it is why you have to go shuffle papers, or are too busy to get back to someone, or dont have reputable pictures from reputable sites (and in fact you hide the origins) but all you do is say something that has nothing to do with nothing, and certainly nothing to do with what you are saying it evinces, and cannot when called even explain one of your simplest of fucktarded statements in which you fundamentally claim that the law of conservation of energy would prevent any floors from standing.............a premise on which your whole insane and untenable theories rely.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 330
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 9:39:52 AM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
What happens if I make known what I - using internet sources, so anyone can do the same...

You're assuming everything on the internet is factually correct.

As for below -
Dude.
Srsly.
Go up to a Muslim, tell him he's really a Jew, and see what happens.  Perhaps you should pay a visit to a local imam.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
...in my opinion Muslims are Jews) will resist any pressure to change their culture. The Greek Maccabees tried it and failed, the Romans tried it and failed, Mohammed and his Arabs tried it and failed (and instead were themselves converted to the Jewish religion), the Crusaders tried it and failed. Only in Spain and Portugal were the Muslims ever defeated and converted - but even that was not a complete success, as the Marans (converted Jews and Muslims) persisted in their Jewish customs.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 331
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 9:43:01 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

you havent said shit proved shit or demonstrated shit.

notice that there are 3 people here ooohing and ahhing (including yourself in that number) the rest have clearly demonstrated that you dont know a thing, havent shown a thing, and havent done other than parrot whackos, and it is why you have to go shuffle papers, or are too busy to get back to someone, or dont have reputable pictures from reputable sites (and in fact you hide the origins) but all you do is say something that has nothing to do with nothing, and certainly nothing to do with what you are saying it evinces, and cannot when called even explain one of your simplest of fucktarded statements in which you fundamentally claim that the law of conservation of energy would prevent any floors from standing.............a premise on which your whole insane and untenable theories rely.




Dont you care about YOUR money?   This after all is going to cost YOU as well as anyone else in the country.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StC_Au76i_g

or

<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/StC_Au76i_g&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/StC_Au76i_g&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object>

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 332
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 9:44:09 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

again, none you are full of shit, no, I have repeatedly said that the lower floors were heavier construction, and you have ducked the conservation of energy reference, and the columns failing with some 100 floors dropping on them is not paper and washers.

and again, there is nothing that washers and paper show. there is no proportion there is no scale in weight, structure torsion, tension, nothing...........

if I take a sheet of wet toilet paper and drop lead blocks thru it, it will fall to the floor......ergo id est, I have proven that your washer video is a fake.....just as reasonable.

regarding your other video of the demolition and the tower tipping over, it was done from the base down, and was nothing like the wtc collapse, of which both videos prove my point entirely.





you really should have stopped before removing any doubt what so ever that you are completely bankrupt in the physics department.

Like other bankrupt conspiracy theorists trying to support the 19 hijacker conspiracy theory you just made a total fool of yourself when the axe of directly applicable evidence is planted between your eyes and you still dont get it.



19 high jackers.    I heard a few of them are STILL alive!

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 333
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 9:46:16 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Hunkie, all other matters notwithstanding my penis is big enough to satisfy me.




Well mine does not.   I ploy to get more sex this year. I stopped for a while because of the aggravation.   maybe I can hire out.    The fling needs to come by more often and drunk would be good.  He needs some lessons on touching.  Touch me and I am able to perform better.   Not that you need to know that.   Sucks being 46.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 334
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 9:47:44 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Waleed Alshehri
Still Alive

Wail Alshehri
Still alive

Mohamed Atta
Still Alive

Abdulaziz Alomari
Still Alive

Khalid Almihdhar
Still Alive

Salem Alhazmi
Still Alive

Marwan Al-Shehhi
Still Alive11

Saeed Alghamdi
Still Alive

Ahmed Alnami
Still Alive
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread28945/pg1


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 335
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 9:56:52 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Who knows- Maybe we can get one of them on the phone.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 336
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 10:04:04 AM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
Anyone accounted for the fact that there are a lot of common names in the Arab world?  What proof do these guys have that the hijackers are alive.  All this source does is state it with no proof.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 337
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 10:07:30 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
well, we have another source with no proof that we can get more non-evidence from that says the planes landed with all passengers, so there cant be none of them dead, and so it looks to me like there is some dissention in the ranks of our little conspirator clique here at collarme.

It seems to me that these three should coordinate policy and present some sort of united front, or by god this thing is going to unravel about as fast as they tell it, ain't it?

LOL

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 338
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 10:11:49 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Anyone accounted for the fact that there are a lot of common names in the Arab world?  What proof do these guys have that the hijackers are alive.  All this source does is state it with no proof.


Which is precisely why 7 is the crux of the matter.  Delete the financial gain- and the rest will flow nicely. I promise!!

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 339
RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE - 3/6/2010 10:12:59 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

well, we have another source with no proof that we can get more non-evidence from that says the planes landed with all passengers, so there cant be none of them dead, and so it looks to me like there is some dissention in the ranks of our little conspirator clique here at collarme.

It seems to me that these three should coordinate policy and present some sort of united front, or by god this thing is going to unravel about as fast as they tell it, ain't it?

LOL

Ron



Just curious Mr smarty pants.    How many $ has this even cost you and your kin?   

Come up with a dollar number for us.  

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 340
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: WASHINGTON TIMES QUESTIONS WTC 7 COLLAPSE Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078