kdsub
Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AnimusRex Actually, I agree,that they should be following their constituent's wishes. But only to a point- we don't have direct democracy- we don't vote on literally every bill that comes up. We elect people to do that for us, and trust them to do what is in our best interest, overall. Which sounds rather patronizing, but it has to be this way. Oftentimes bills have complexity that the public literally just doesn't grasp, and the elected officials do. If they were simply to "follow our wishes", then someone could argue that we don't need Congress, we should just have opinion polling, and whichever bill gets the highest polling percentage, is passed. We need human representatives, who exercise wisdom and discernment in how they vote. I don't know that it is party that is messing with the process, so much as lobbyists- I read today that there are 8 healthcare lobbyists for ever Congressman and Senator. With inflluence and pressure like that, the people's wishes get smothered pretty effectively, party or no party. I also agree with you to a point...I've always said that all politicians should make it known to their electorate whether they intend to follow their conscious or strictly represent the majority wishes of the voters… there is a difference. Knowing the wishes of your electorate is not hard in this day and age. I receive many fliers requesting my opinion as well as many phone call polls. It is also their duty through communication to explain the bills they will be voting on to the voters so they can gauge their opinion. I don’t believe that any useful legislation is too complicated for the average citizen to understand. Butch
_____________________________
Mark Twain: I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing
|