RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS!

RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Arpig -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 11:29:42 AM)
quote: You know like when I rebutted your response on the wtc and you left the debate with your tail between your legs. Nobody left with their tail between their legs due to your wondrous rebuttal...we just give up and hope that one day you will either just shut up or get on medication...you are not 1/10th as brilliant as you think you are, and 99.999% of what you post is utter bullshit, take for example your "sovereignty" bullshit...which amazingly enough appeared shortly after somebody posted a link to Michael Badnarik's Constitution class....coincidence?? I think not, you are the troll around here and more importantly you are a fool. [image]local://upfiles/218457/66DC492907FD4FCE9314D03BF5E9E6BD.jpg[/image]

Jeffff -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 12:09:43 PM)
You will get My Jews, and the truth about 911, when you pry them from my cold dead fingers Charlton Heston and the New World Order (hell of a band name, no?)

Arpig -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 12:15:45 PM)
quote: (hell of a band name, no?) I love it!!!

Silence8 -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 3:36:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AnimusRex Seriously man- I would pay good money to hear an audio of you and Hunky (and maybe Term) calling into the show to offer your opinions on , oh, just world events, history, legal theories in general to the good professor. really...good, hard earned money I would pay, gladly. Yes, yes, I second that! Well, okay, I actually don't want to spend money on that, but I'd listen if it were free. On a side note, I think the liberal emphasis on gun control is largely misdirected. Frankly I don't want our government's having any monopoly over the means of violence than it currently possesses.

AnimusRex -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 5:29:00 PM)
Actually, I am a rifle-owning, strong proponent of 2nd Amendment rights. I just harsh on the gun nuts because they give us all a bad name.

slvemike4u -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 6:04:00 PM)
What the fuck is all this blather about(I can't be bothered to read another gun thread)...but last I heard pro gun laws were on the march...why are all of you armed citizens so fucking scared?

Real0ne -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 8:48:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Arpig quote: You know like when I rebutted your response on the wtc and you left the debate with your tail between your legs. Nobody left with their tail between their legs due to your wondrous rebuttal...we just give up and hope that one day you will either just shut up or get on medication...you are not 1/10th as brilliant as you think you are, and 99.999% of what you post is utter bullshit, take for example your "sovereignty" bullshit...which amazingly enough appeared shortly after somebody posted a link to Michael Badnarik's Constitution class....coincidence?? I think not, you are the troll around here and more importantly you are a fool. [image]local://upfiles/59055/9BF424EB57A045EDB2F70DA0A4989CA9.gif[/image] wrong again but what the hell lets take a constitutional lesson from a canadian! They can teach us how to be 100% lock stock and barrel chattel!

Real0ne -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 8:51:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: slvemike4u What the fuck is all this blather about(I can't be bothered to read another gun thread)...but last I heard pro gun laws were on the march...why are all of you armed citizens so fucking scared? well lots of americans know all this shit originates in the UK and you aint got no guns!

Real0ne -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/27/2010 8:53:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail how? The meaning of 'sovereignty' is the decree of the sovereign makes law. which you don't. quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I asked you to explain soveriegnty to me, since you claim to be the only one who gets it, and cite examples of your soveriengnty, (which you do not possess) but you cannot and so...... AND IF YOU CAN RELATE IT TO 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS SOMEHOW, (which I possess in spades) even better. no you didnt. You asked it and answered it. Its no sercret and it in every law dictionary out there. try google it worlks really well for looking up words you dont understand

Termyn8or -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/28/2010 8:52:39 AM)
Randy Weaver was plenty sovereign. Then Lon Horiuchi came along and he got a dead Wife out of the deal. Proof for both sides. He was wrong, of course, unpatriotic by not enjoining our wonderful society. But for some reason he did win a cool million or so in a lawsuit against the government. Note that their excuse for killing his Wife is that he sold a shotgun with a barrell that was just a bit too short. Fucking TERRORIST ! KILL HIS WIFE ! HE HAS NO RIGHT TO LIVE HOW HE WANTS, SO IF HE DOESN'T WANT TO LIVE THE WAY WE WANT HE MUST GO. Just where I don't know. T

thornhappy -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/28/2010 8:55:34 AM)
No matter how many engineers or architects rebut you, you discard the data based on your chosen worldview, which does not encompass reality. It's a profound waste of time to deal with you, like wrestling with an intestine. quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: thornhappy Yep, there goes Real. If you don't agree with him, you're a tard and/or a troll. nah just on certian subjects. You know like when I rebutted your response on the wtc and you left the debate with your tail between your legs. Since you claim to be an engineer you shjould have been able to do much better. "IF I WERE WRONG" but you didnt. Well that pretty much summed up the validity of your position when you failed on all levels to defend it. Posts like that where no attempt is made or posts like rons above is nothing more than a troll post, as I recognize people straight up especially when it relates to Sovereignty who are wholly incapable of comprehending the matter. In that case even the casual reader can conclude the purpose is nothing more than a troll post.

Real0ne -> RE: 2nd amendment rights GUNS! (2/28/2010 9:20:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thornhappy No matter how many engineers or architects rebut you, you discard the data based on your chosen worldview, which does not encompass reality. It's a profound waste of time to deal with you, like wrestling with an intestine. when are you people going to stop your incessant whining? You really need to get off the SOP and realize some out here are smarter than you and see through you and your tactics like freshly washed pane glass. Coming in with off point arguments by throwing a truck load of shit at the wall hoping something will stick and then claiming they are valid is simply one of the oldest most obvious and worn out shoes known to man. You think people give you credit for that now days you are smoking some really good shit. Any time you want to put your self aggrandizing engineering skills against mine lets fucking rock, I will bury your ass and you know it. That is why you bug out every time I refute and like every other loser run away whining that arguing with me just isnt worth it so save your beaten ass from losing credibility. Well the only problem you got and your other pal has is that I can take this to its least common denominator and explain it in terms such that a young child can reason through the process. So keep it up, when you fail to dazzle us with your brilliance keep trying to baffle us with your bullshit. Your ship is sinking fast.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875