Andalusite -> RE: A few switch questions... (3/2/2010 7:46:50 AM)
|
Currently I have a Master and a female submissive playpartner, but even when I was single, or was monogamous with my previous Dominant, or with a top or a bottom, I have considered myself to be a switch since I first discovered I liked to bottom occasionally. I consider that to be my identity, and slave to be my relationship designation. [:D] IMHO, anyone who likes any combination of Domination/Sadism/Topping and submission/masochism/bottoming is a switch. Dominant masochists, submissive sadists, top/bottom only egalitarian kinky folks, it's all good! So far, I haven't felt any inclination to switch on a D/s basis with the same person, although I'm perfectly happy with topping and bottoming to the same person. I'm very decisive about being a switch. [;)] In person, I haven't had any flack over being a switch. I did have some people try to claim that I was or should be submissive when I was just bottoming, or not involved with them at all. Online, I've had a couple of posters in the "Ask A Mistress" forum claim I shouldn't post there because I'm currently a slave, even though I had a 5-year D/s relationship with my previous submissive, and currently am involved with my submissive playpartner. Other than that, most of the anti-switch talk has been in general, or directed primarily toward men, rather than me in particular. Lot of nonsense, like claiming that anyone who has ever bottomed couldn't *possibly* be dominant, and the like.
|
|
|
|