Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


pahunkboy -> Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 9:04:16 AM)

Russia Today reports that a new movement to reinvestigate the 9/11 attacks is gaining pace in the US. With major public support, 12 towns are set to decide whether to ask the federal government for a new independent probe.Twelve towns are making a new 9/11 inquiry a ballot box issue this spring. Voters heading to the polls will vote on a non-binding resolution that supporters hope eventually sparks momentum and legislative power nationwide.

Hundreds of citizens are expressing a desire to find out the real truth and are attending meetings where local experts, such as physicist John Wyndam, present alternative 9/11 theories, specifically surrounding the collapse of World Trade Center Seven and the Twin Towers.

Basically it is impossible for the top 12 stories to have crushed the lower structure without acceleration. Physically impossible and yet that is what you observe, claimed Wyndam.

While most elected officials have ignored cries for a 9/11 probe, former Keene mayor Mike Blastos is an exception.

The two biggest tragedies I can recall other than world wars concerning America was Kennedys assassination and the attack on 9/11. And they both remain completely unanswered, Blastos said.

The 9/11 commission, like the Warren Commission, left millions of Americans doubtful over the official governments version. Bedding withholds accusations, but demands answers.

I do not like to speculate who did what, or who let something happening. That should be found out. Building 7 was not even mentioned in the original report. But I do know that a building that has not been hit by an airplane, such as Building 7, does not come down like perfectly controlled demolition.

New Hampshire was the first colony to declare independence from England in 1776. Only time will tell if the first sovereign US state will be where the push for a new 9/11 investigation could preval/snip

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BX8qS4Cpx6k

or

<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BX8qS4Cpx6k&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BX8qS4Cpx6k&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object>




pahunkboy -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 9:08:52 AM)

Gosh- it goes to ballet.   That means people vote- which means it is political.  




mnottertail -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 9:11:09 AM)

how is ballet political?

Rudolf Nureyev




Jeffff -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 9:16:51 AM)

I dance to express the proletariats discontent!


Gregory Hines




mnottertail -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 9:25:04 AM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG3PnQ3tgzY

Fred Astaire




Jeffff -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 9:26:19 AM)

That must be the west side of New England.


Ginger




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 9:30:44 AM)

Russia Today. Well wired into New England local lunacy? Back on the meds.




pahunkboy -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 10:56:09 AM)

so  they want a real investigation.

good for them.

i want the 23 pages to be declassified.

nice of you to give up your retirement to AIG.




thornhappy -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 4:59:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
Basically it is impossible for the top 12 stories to have crushed the lower structure without acceleration. Physically impossible and yet that is what you observe, claimed Wyndam.

Well, Wyndam's incompetent if he says that.  For one thing, every object on the face of the earth is subject to acceleration - it's the acceleration due to gravity (9.8m/sec^2 or 32ft/sec^2).  For another thing, it wouldn't be physically impossible if it's happened already.  Many people here, many times have pointed out to you why WTC7 fell, including giving you the links for the engineering analysis. 

"As for Building 7 and the evidence for Controlled Demolition, let's review the evidence... What we do have for sure.

1) Fireman saying there was "a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors." "I would say it was probably about a third of it".

2) A laymen officer the fireman was standing next to said, "that building doesn’t look straight." He then says "It didn’t look right".

3) They put a transit on it and afterward were "pretty sure she was going to collapse."

4) They "saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13".

5) Photographic evidence of a fire directly under the penthouse which collapsed first.

6) The penthouse fell first, followed by the rest of the building shortly after.

7) The collapse happened from the bottom.

8) Photographic evidence of large smoke plumes against the back of B7. Plumes of smoke so large you can't see the entire rear of the 47 story office building.


9) Silverstein is not a demolition expert and was talking to a fire fighter and not a demolition expert. Why would he use the word "Pull" to describe the demolition to a fire fighter?

10) Silverstein denies "Pull" means "Controlled demolition". He said it means "Pull" the teams out of the building.

11) Silverstein did not make the decision to "Pull". (Whatever that means) "they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse"

12) Another fire fighter used "Pull" to describe the decision made to get him out of the building."




thornhappy -> RE: Twelve New England towns demand 9/11 reinvestigation - RT Report (3/4/2010 5:04:32 PM)

You've been told several times why those pages were classified.  They have nothing to do with the collapse of the buildings.

And how does AIG relate to this?

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

so  they want a real investigation.

good for them.

i want the 23 pages to be declassified.

nice of you to give up your retirement to AIG.





Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625