RE: Seeking Mistress (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


lobodomslavery -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 10:04:02 AM)

And thats the other thing. Why does contributing have to be in the form of financial? Surely an offer to clean the Lady in question's house every weekend or to mop the floor or to make dinner or to cut the lawn of the Lady in question is proper service too
Kevin




Domin8tingUrDrmz -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 10:06:50 AM)

Don't put words in my font. I said nothing about contributing financially. I said contributing in other ways.

Regardless, I seriously doubt the OP intended this to be a 'tribute' thread.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 10:11:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery

I think the OP has a point. Women should not demand tribute in the current recession. Domination should be free.
Kevin



This just might be the most hypocritical thing I've ever read on these boards. You identify as a submissive man and yet you have such a sense of entitlement as to what women owe you?

Oh I'd like to give you a domination session for free alright...

- LA




lobodomslavery -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 10:15:16 AM)

I dont have a sense of entitlement.  Im all for paying half in half or even 60-40 but not $150 for one hour 's company. That to me is extortion, and it is this kind of extortion which has resulted in the mass drop in consumer spending and consequent economic decline world wide. People are no longer prepared to pay rip off prices for anything and why should they. To feed the greed of the rich? No way. $150 and upwards for sessions. That is ENTITLEMENT
Kevin




LadyAngelika -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 10:26:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery

I dont have a sense of entitlement.  Im all for paying half in half or even 60-40 but not $150 for one hour 's company. That to me is extortion, and it is this kind of extortion which has resulted in the mass drop in consumer spending and consequent economic decline world wide. People are no longer prepared to pay rip off prices for anything and why should they. To feed the greed of the rich? No way. $150 and upwards for sessions. That is ENTITLEMENT
Kevin



No one is forcing you to visit a professional dominatrix.

I'd like to eat fine French cuisine every night. Should the chefs at my favorite restaurant lower their prices to accomodate me?

I'd like to drive a brand new custom designed Mercedes SL Class with all the AMG trimming but I can only affored a C Class. Should my local dealership lower their prices because there is a recession?

The answer is no. These are not essential items for survival. We aren't talking about food or water. They are luxury purchases, just like a visit to your local dominatrix. If it is that important to you, then it is time that you readjust your budget and priorities.

To suggest that they should lower their prices to accommodate you is an absolute sign that you have a sense of entitlement. The world owes you nothing. You want to get an idea of that? Move to an oppressed country. Otherwise, get over yourself.

- LA




lobodomslavery -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 10:30:11 AM)

Well actually dealerships HAVE lowered their prices. It is less expensive to eat out now and will get even more so as there has not exactly been a surge to the restaurants. Why should nt Dommes not lower accordingly. It is getting cheaper to live. Why the greed. Dommes sometimes wonder why they cant get a sub? Simple really. It could be that Your demands are too high
Kevin




LadyAngelika -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 10:51:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery

Well actually dealerships HAVE lowered their prices. It is less expensive to eat out now and will get even more so as there has not exactly been a surge to the restaurants. Why should nt Dommes not lower accordingly. It is getting cheaper to live. Why the greed. Dommes sometimes wonder why they cant get a sub? Simple really. It could be that Your demands are too high
Kevin


Those who have chosen to lower their prices have done so as a strategic move to increase sales. They have not done so out of social obligation. This is business 101.

My firm has not lowered it's price. Why? Because we didn't need to. In fact, we got more requests for work than we could handle. Perhaps that is the same for those dominatrix you are referring to.

So tough cookies to you. The world owes you nothing. Drop your sense of entitlement and you might find life starts looking brighter for you.

- LA




theGuideGoddess -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 11:39:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery

I think the OP has a point. Women should not demand tribute in the current recession. Domination should be free.
Kevin



What a perfect nick Kevin: 
The lobotomy must be complete….thinking that dominants should just give free all that it takes to be.  Are you inferring that should be to just anyone that asks?  Have you stopped to consider the effort/energy that it takes?  While seemingly effortless, it may well be less so that it seems.   

Your inference is like saying:  Why wouldn’t a prostitute just have sex for free?  Why won’t anyone just do me without effort on my part???  Gosh, it might take some real depth and intellect to move past this, but with a lobotomy perhaps you should just hang it up.

I am constantly getting the do me sub/slave want to be’s.  My question is and will continue to be:  What is in it for me???  Besides fulfilling your fantasies or needs as the case may be?  Tell me why I want to waste both my very valuable time and energy on you?  Many would find their search more successful if they took their eyes off of their own do me needs and desires.  Seeking to find someone with compatible needs and desires focused on that other person’s satisfaction and of course copped the right attitude.  I have never charged, and don't ever intend to.  There will always have to be something in it for me and the other party or it isn't going to happen.

TGG




lobodomslavery -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 11:42:55 AM)

If You were local I would offer to tidy Your house for You but unfortunately Your not and Im on the other side of the vast Atlantic ocean
Kevin




Andalusite -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 3:46:54 PM)

bebound2b, this isn't the appropriate forum for personals ads. In general, though, there are quite a few Dominant women who are seeking a submissive, or who will play more casually without charging for it. However, they pretty much universally expect you to connect with them as an individual person first, and may expect more of your time and attention when you aren't playing. I'm not into the online thing, so I don't have any suggestions for you on that front.




azjojoba -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 4:44:26 PM)

Women got used to charging $150 an hour for sexual services during the boom time because lots of men had that kind of cash to blow. The reality now is that men don't have that kind of expendable income.

Eventually market forces will drive domintrix and prostitution fees down. I don't see any reason a women should get paid more than $10 or $15 to spank a man, especially since it's pleasurable for her also. Most men nowadays are facing wage deflation and unemployment so it's a natural market force that the ladies will have to lower their fees to match economic reality. If they don't lower their salaries they will end up with no work, which means starvation.

Legalization would help also because it would eliminate pimps, who are the greedy middlemen. Maybe the Obama's can help us on that angle.




KITTYLECTRO -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:02:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery
Women should not demand tribute in the current recession.

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba
I don't see any reason a woman should get paid more than $10 or $15 to spank a man

These statements are so hilariously asinine, they made me decide to raise all my rates, and I'm not even a "Pro Domina".




LadyPact -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:03:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba

Women got used to charging $150 an hour for sexual services during the boom time because lots of men had that kind of cash to blow. The reality now is that men don't have that kind of expendable income.

Eventually market forces will drive domintrix and prostitution fees down. I don't see any reason a women should get paid more than $10 or $15 to spank a man, especially since it's pleasurable for her also. Most men nowadays are facing wage deflation and unemployment so it's a natural market force that the ladies will have to lower their fees to match economic reality. If they don't lower their salaries they will end up with no work, which means starvation.


Funny.  I don't see any pros starving.  Yet, don't you hunger every day in your stark reality?




thishereboi -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:04:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery

I think the OP has a point. Women should not demand tribute in the current recession. Domination should be free.
Kevin



Does that go for all professions? I need a haircut, but would rather not have to pay. Being in a recession and all, do you think they will cut it for free?




slavekal -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:08:59 PM)

There are many lifestyle non pro dommes out there.  But you have to put in the work to find the right one for you.




PeonForHer -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:10:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba
Eventually market forces will drive domintrix and prostitution fees down. I don't see any reason a women should get paid more than $10 or $15 to spank a man, especially since it's pleasurable for her also. .


That's contradictory, Azjojoba.  Market forces may well drive dominatrix and prostitution fees down.  That's the laws of supply and demand at work.  But what you, morally, think a woman should get paid  for e.g. spanking a man isn't relevant to those forces. 

It's strange, this system of capitalism that we live under.  I've found that the most ardent supporters of the free market always have 'exceptions' in their heads - areas in which they assume and expect the laws of supply and demand somehow shouldn't apply.  In the area in which I live cleaners charge huge amounts.  People complain bitterly about paying these amounts because cleaners 'just shouldn't be expensive'.  Likewise, carers of children *should* be cheap.  But cleaners and childcarers can charge highly, because of those laws of supply and demand  - so, they just will.  Why would they act any differently to any other traders, any providers of any other services?




DrkJourney -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:10:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I've always wondered why women keep telling me that looking at me makes them want to vomit. 

Thanks, Drk. *Blush* [;)]



Then you are hanging around the wrong women...[;)]

Thanks for the scenery....lol




azjojoba -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:12:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Funny.  I don't see any pros starving.  Yet, don't you hunger every day in your stark reality?



Lady -- ya got me again.




azjojoba -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:14:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Does that go for all professions? I need a haircut, but would rather not have to pay. Being in a recession and all, do you think they will cut it for free?



Bad example -- the price of hair cuts has gone way down, especially factoring in inflation. Sexual services must do the same because the market is all powerful.




azjojoba -> RE: Seeking Mistress (3/14/2010 5:18:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: azjojoba
Eventually market forces will drive domintrix and prostitution fees down. I don't see any reason a women should get paid more than $10 or $15 to spank a man, especially since it's pleasurable for her also. .


That's contradictory, Azjojoba.  Market forces may well drive dominatrix and prostitution fees down.  That's the laws of supply and demand at work.  But what you, morally, think a woman should get paid  for e.g. spanking a man isn't relevant to those forces. 



No contradiction -- if I was a high roller in Washington DC I would have no problem paying $1000 for a high quality lady that looks like a fashion model. Unfortunately I'm not immune to market forces so what I can pay is only what I can pay. Morality has nothing to do with it.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125