Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


CelticPrince -> Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 12:07:43 PM)

I have been relatively dormant on the boards lately due to life circumstances, however I have noted an incidence isnthe evolution of who the posters are for one consideration; I recognize so few name compared to the past and then the point of this post that I offer conconsideration and or comment.

I recently had a "new Dominant" ask me a question related to his relationship to his sub. That being why was she so difficult to "control", "manage" outside of sex.

Theirs is a part time reaLTIME RELATIONSHIP WHERE SEX IS A MAJOR PART OF THE RELATIONSHIP.. After that cosideration therir relationship did not fair well for either one. He seemed to feel that because she loved sex that she was indeed a submissive. As he stated, she was so into cockworship that she must have been a great submissive; but beyoubd that there was little submission criteria.

So the consideration is this; are folks coming into the path with sex as a first consideration? Or are many new path walkers slipping in under a false flag?.................. What say you?

CP




LadyAngelika -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 12:10:35 PM)

I say people come to this with a plethora of motivations and along the way their motivations and desires may change or evolve.

There is no one right way to do this thing we call BDSM.

- LA




BotanicalMiss -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 12:43:08 PM)

I think that most people are drawn into this world because of their love of kinky sex, whether they prefer to be dominant or submissive in their sex lives. Love of sex and love of submissive sex don't necessarily have anything at all to do with how a person behaves or feels outside of the bedroom. For many, the bedroom is the only place they have any desire to have a power exchange. It's not bad, it's not wrong, it's just the way they are. Others, after finding out that people really do have that exchange outside of the bedroom, realize that is what they want or need. I think that when most people hear "bdsm" the first thing they think of is sex. I think back to a phrase I heard over and over which states "D/s is the way we live, bdsm is the way we play." Yet bdsm is what most of the world hears about, not D/s. So it's only natural that kinky sex is what draws people to a place where they are then informed that there is, or can be, much more.

So to answer your question, based on the emails and communications I have had over the years, I think sex is the first consideration of the majority of those who find this path. For some that changes and for some, it remains their first and only consideration. For those of us who want more than that, it's our choice to choose some really good kinky sex with someone or to continue looking for someone who is more compatible overall.




Focus50 -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 1:57:02 PM)

She sounds like your common or garden variety "do me" submissive. Seems a little more common among male/subs but that's likely 'cause there's more of them.

If this "new Dominant" wants more than a bedroom submissive, he'll need to find someone who's focused on more than her own selfish desires.

Focus.




LadyPact -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 2:57:07 PM)

I think a good number of folks are drawn to kink because of sex.  The mass media has promoted BDSM as the 'new black' of more exciting sex for some time now.  It's a great commercial gimmick that entices folks to believe that there is a more exciting way to engage in sex.  They've used it before with other things that were considered taboo and it's worked in various other ways.  After all, who doesn't want to be having better sex?  LOL.

So, yes, I do think we have an influx of people who get started in this based on a sexual desire.  For some, the sexual is as far as they are going to go with it.  For others, they are going to find that there's a whole world of this that goes beyond a little slap and tickle in the bedroom.  It's actually pretty cool when you think about the possibilities.




Andalusite -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 3:24:48 PM)

CP, "kinky vanilla" is an oxymoron. Since this woman *doesn't* claim to be submissive, and he just thinks she ought to be because she enjoys doing certain sexual things, I think he is the one who is out of line in his expectations. I've run into that attitude from a couple of people I've played with casually, before I learned to screen them better, and it's extremely awkward when someone blathers about how "submissive" I am when I was just bottoming![:'(] It's pretty much as if he were going on about how many orgasms I'd had, when I didn't come at all. Unless I've specifically agreed to a D/s or M/s relationship, they don't have authority to control me. I don't pick fights, and I'm not at all difficult to be with, and am pretty compliant most of the time, but expecting authority that I haven't given over would get me seriously annoyed.

Focus, I disagree that bottoms and bedroom-only submissives are automatically selfish or self-centered. Ideally, in any relationship, both (or all I suppose, if they're poly) people should get what they need, and at least some of what they want. If that isn't happening, then they are a poor match, regardless of their D/s orientation or relationship dynamic. I've been in a few kinky egalitarian relationships, where there wasn't any overt constant control coming from either side, but they were willing to do things they didn't necessarily enjoy as much to make me happy, and vice versa.




wisdomtogive -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 3:50:50 PM)

I really don't know for sure, but I would think many come into this for the sex. In my case, i came into to explore my submissive nature, and discovered a bonus...kink. Still though, I am more about exploring my submissive nature first.
I also do believe that as a rule, I do things backwards compare to most people..shrugs:)




CelticPrince -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 3:54:26 PM)

quote:

I say people come to this with a plethora of motivations and along the way their motivations and desires may change or evolve.

There is no one right way to do this thing we call BDSM.

LA,

Damn, there is an example, LA always were the call letters for Lucky Albatross!! That being said were is the D/s formula for your stated BDSM?

CP




CelticPrince -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 3:56:45 PM)

quote:

I think that most people are drawn into this world because of their love of kinky sex, whether they prefer to be dominant or submissive in their sex lives. Love of sex and love of submissive sex don't necessarily have anything at all to do with how a person behaves or feels outside of the bedroom. For many, the bedroom is the only place they have any desire to have a power exchange. It's not bad, it's not wrong, it's just the way they are. Others, after finding out that people really do have that exchange outside of the bedroom, realize that is what they want or need. I think that when most people hear "bdsm" the first thing they think of is sex. I think back to a phrase I heard over and over which states "D/s is the way we live, bdsm is the way we play." Yet bdsm is what most of the world hears about, not D/s. So it's only natural that kinky sex is what draws people to a place where they are then informed that there is, or can be, much more.

So to answer your question, based on the emails and communications I have had over the years, I think sex is the first consideration of the majority of those who find this path. For some that changes and for some, it remains their first and only consideration. For those of us who want more than that, it's our choice to choose some really good kinky sex with someone or to continue looking for someone who is more compatible overall.


miss,

There are so valid observations in your reply. Thanks for your input.

CP




CelticPrince -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 3:59:06 PM)

quote:

She sounds like your common or garden variety "do me" submissive. Seems a little more common among male/subs but that's likely 'cause there's more of them.

If this "new Dominant" wants more than a bedroom submissive, he'll need to find someone who's focused on more than her own selfish desires.

Focus.


Focus,

more male subs then fem subs??? really

good observation tho.

CP




CelticPrince -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 4:04:07 PM)

quote:

I think a good number of folks are drawn to kink because of sex. The mass media has promoted BDSM as the 'new black' of more exciting sex for some time now. It's a great commercial gimmick that entices folks to believe that there is a more exciting way to engage in sex. They've used it before with other things that were considered taboo and it's worked in various other ways. After all, who doesn't want to be having better sex? LOL.

So, yes, I do think we have an influx of people who get started in this based on a sexual desire. For some, the sexual is as far as they are going to go with it. For others, they are going to find that there's a whole world of this that goes beyond a little slap and tickle in the bedroom. It's actually pretty cool when you think about the possibilities.


LP,

I agree with your premise, but do you feel about the question overlayed to D/s. ? The escalation of new sexual experiences begines somewhere. Could that be the "D": in the equation?

CP




CelticPrince -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 4:10:11 PM)

quote:

CP, "kinky vanilla" is an oxymoron. Since this woman *doesn't* claim to be submissive, and he just thinks she ought to be because she enjoys doing certain sexual things, I think he is the one who is out of line in his expectations. I've run into that attitude from a couple of people I've played with casually, before I learned to screen them better, and it's extremely awkward when someone blathers about how "submissive" I am when I was just bottoming! It's pretty much as if he were going on about how many orgasms I'd had, when I didn't come at all. Unless I've specifically agreed to a D/s or M/s relationship, they don't have authority to control me. I don't pick fights, and I'm not at all difficult to be with, and am pretty compliant most of the time, but expecting authority that I haven't given over would get me seriously annoyed.
.

Andalucite,

Amutual need society perhaps? Yet by the Title of this site would denote a power exchange by the parties. Laughs, perhaps a half way house site might be created to meet that need.

Thanks for your thoughts.

CP




CelticPrince -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 4:16:22 PM)

quote:

I really don't know for sure, but I would think many come into this for the sex. In my case, i came into to explore my submissive nature, and discovered a bonus...kink. Still though, I am more about exploring my submissive nature first.
I also do believe that as a rule, I do things backwards compare to most people..shrugs:)


wisdom,

May the force be with you and Dark Steven! Thanks for your input.

CP




Andalusite -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 4:18:24 PM)

I don't understand what you mean by half-way house here. I do think your friend needs to talk with her about what he needs, and what he would expect if she *did* give him control in those areas, instead of just assuming she will because she likes sucking cock.[;)] She might be very much willing to give him what he wants and needs, or they might find a compromise that works for her, but starting out with unspoken expectations doesn't serve anyone well.




wisdomtogive -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 4:20:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CelticPrince

quote:

I really don't know for sure, but I would think many come into this for the sex. In my case, i came into to explore my submissive nature, and discovered a bonus...kink. Still though, I am more about exploring my submissive nature first.
I also do believe that as a rule, I do things backwards compare to most people..shrugs:)


wisdom,

May the force be with you and Dark Steven! Thanks for your input.

CP


I do hope the force will be with Dark Steven, but my Master's name is David..MasteroftheDark in NJ.




takemeforyourown -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 5:39:04 PM)

It was in the context of sex that I discovered my need to submit, but I have since realized that I want to submit in ALL things.




DesFIP -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 5:54:52 PM)

It sounds like he wants her to be something she isn't. He made assumptions based on his own desires without talking to her. She has every right to want a power equal relationship with kinky sex. He has every right to want a power relationship. But by not discussing what they both wanted and determining if there was sufficient compatibility ahead of time, they got a relationship that makes neither of them happy.

Hopefully they will learn to communicate better in the future or they will repeat these mistakes.

Of course, she may be submissive but not feel that he is someone she can submit to. Perhaps she doesn't trust his decision making because he doesn't make good decisions. We don't have enough information to judge.




LadyAngelika -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 5:57:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CelticPrince

quote:

I say people come to this with a plethora of motivations and along the way their motivations and desires may change or evolve.

There is no one right way to do this thing we call BDSM.


LA,

Damn, there is an example, LA always were the call letters for Lucky Albatross!! That being said were is the D/s formula for your stated BDSM?

CP


Not that it matters, but I was on Collarme Message boards in mid-2004 a little over a year before Lucky Albatross and they were my call letters first. That said, I do hold her posts in high esteem and find only a compliment in being mixed up with her.

That said, I'm not sure I understand your question.

Edited to add: OriginallyfromLA didn't originate from me ;-)

- LA




Lockit -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 7:45:42 PM)

Good to see you CP!

I love sex! I have even come damn close to worshiping a cock or two in my time... (so damn good!) but that had nothing to do with submitting or being submissive! I am dominant and I can love sex and a cock.

For someone to think that because someone loves sex and a cock, they are submissive, they are in error, not the wayward submissive who isn't a submissive most likely and thus their problems. He jumped to a conclusion, seemingly didn't communicate too well and showed proof of why communication is needed and jumping to conclusions is faulty.

I think this is a different subject on whether people come for the sex and are slipping in under a false flag. She wasn't saying she was submissive. She was saying I love cock and sex! lol

As for some who do slip in... flying a flag of submission or dominance for the sex... you betcha and I have proof in my email every single day! lol They think we are kinky, loose women ready to jump on any cock that presents itself. lol Hell, they even tell their friends about us and invite them in too!




peppermint -> RE: Submission vs kinky vanilla sex (3/14/2010 8:21:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

So, yes, I do think we have an influx of people who get started in this based on a sexual desire.  For some, the sexual is as far as they are going to go with it.  For others, they are going to find that there's a whole world of this that goes beyond a little slap and tickle in the bedroom.  It's actually pretty cool when you think about the possibilities.



LP said it as well as I could.  Adding to what she has said, it's been a hell of a lot of fun too. 

Welcome back to posting, Sir.  I was wondering what had become of you. 




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875